Chopper0080
2021 - Prove It
I don't disagree, but I also don't know if I want to pay 9 mil for it.2 things our defense seems to be lacking.
I don't disagree, but I also don't know if I want to pay 9 mil for it.2 things our defense seems to be lacking.
I didn’t care about him leaving at the time. Not going the hindsight criticism route on Keim here.
I didn’t care about him leaving at the time. Not going the hindsight criticism route on Keim here.
So a bad pass defense makes pass rushing better because there's more opportunities? I think it levels out if that's the case because there would be less coverage sacks. Also if you're losing, you'll have less pass rush opportunities too as teams will run the ball more.He has exceeded my expectations but keep in mind the weak NYG pass coverage provides him quite a few opportunities.
I agree, we didn’t have $9m available for a player who we weren’t sure would be able to get to the QB still. He always was a step late after his knee injury.I don't disagree, but I also don't know if I want to pay 9 mil for it.
It was easier not to overreact when we’d signed Suggs and Bosa was still in play. If I had really known how likely it was that Suggs was going to be our only guy, I’d have really been mad.As shown by the brevity of, and lack of passion shown in, this thread, you were in the majority opinion of Cardinals fans at the time.
He always was a step late after his knee injury.
He only got $3.75 from NY, we could've swung that.I agree, we didn’t have $9m available for a player who we weren’t sure would be able to get to the QB still. He always was a step late after his knee injury.
Same dude who deserves the credit for bringing in Golden no doubt gets blamed for letting him escape.
NFL justice.
Same dude who deserves the credit for bringing in Golden no doubt gets blamed for letting him escape.
NFL justice.
The guy deserves credit for getting him, but also deserves the blame for not retaining the players that have gone on to contribute elsewhere. He's making the wrong calls by abandoning those he scouted and drafted, only to sign overpriced free agents.these takes make me laugh. Golden had clearly lost a step and it was the right move to let him go
The guy deserves credit for getting him, but also deserves the blame for not retaining the players that have gone on to contribute elsewhere. He's making the wrong calls by abandoning those he scouted and drafted, only to sign overpriced free agents.
I make work analogies a lot, but if I kept losing internal candidates that we hired, trained them poorly, and kept putting the burden on us to hire experienced people who cost us more in both recruitment and training, I would lose my job.
Have I been wailing and gnashing my teeth about Golden anywhere? Keim has re-signed three players in his tenure, and one is a player who would have gone anywhere else if offered a contract. And then Mathieu's gone, and we want to get rid of DJ. He deserves flak for this.just stop. He was clearly not the same player after his ACL tear. It’s taken him a couple years to get back to being productive. You cannot continue to ignore this fact.
now I’m happy for him but good lord
Little confused, Solar. Are you saying we should have kept Golden, Matthieu, and Brown?Have I been wailing and gnashing my teeth about Golden anywhere? Keim has re-signed three players in his tenure, and one is a player who would have gone anywhere else if offered a contract. And then Mathieu's gone, and we want to get rid of DJ. He deserves flak for this.
Have I been wailing and gnashing my teeth about Golden anywhere? Keim has re-signed three players in his tenure, and one is a player who would have gone anywhere else if offered a contract. And then Mathieu's gone, and we want to get rid of DJ. He deserves flak for this.
No, I'm saying that Keim has been incapable of keeping players that should have had a continued role here on decent contracts. Whether you want to indict him for poor drafting or the inability to retain players, it's one of the two.Little confused, Solar. Are you saying we should have kept Golden, Matthieu, and Brown?
Uhhhh... that's not what happened at all.again
we offered Mathieu more money than anybody else. He thought we low balled him made a big deal about it and he wanted to test the market and ended up signing for less that what we offered. He got bad advice from his agent.
DJ signed his big deal and hasn’t played hard since. That’s always a risk.
Uhhhh... that's not what happened at all.
We re-signed him to a major deal, and then stepped back on it later when he was struggling. We asked him to restructure, he said no, and it was the best opportunity for us to cut him with a minimal dead cap hit. He declined to restructure, we cut him, and he went to Houston.
I'm not saying he's the winner here, but we provided him with a major contract after injury just like we did David Johnson, and that comprises most of the very few players Keim has ever brought back past their rookie year.
There's no way for him to know what he would have gotten on the open market. He and his agent being wrong didn't mean Keim gets a pass on not retaining talent or handing out poor contracts.restructure for more money than he got on the open market. Yes? Yes? That’s right
First off, if his agent didn't talk to other teams and get an idea of his market value before rejecting the pay cut demand, he's the worst agent in the league. Second, if Keim's reduced salary offer was better than market value and Matthieu still didn't accept it... is that really on Keim?There's no way for him to know what he would have gotten on the open market. He and his agent being wrong didn't mean Keim gets a pass on not retaining talent or handing out poor contracts.
We can make an excuse for every situation. For almost every player, for every GM. At the end of the day, Keim has not been a good GM that is capable of retaining players, drafting good players, or otherwise.First off, if his agent didn't talk to other teams and get an idea of his market value before rejecting the pay cut demand, he's the worst agent in the league. Second, if Keim's reduced salary offer was better than market value and Matthieu still didn't accept it... is that really on Keim?
...dbs
I'm not making an excuse for every situation, I'm responding to your specific claims. You said "There's no way [for Matthieu] to know what he would have gotten on the open market." That is patenly false. You said that Keim doesn't "[get] a pass on not retaining talent" in this case, but either he does, or you should support giving way above market contracts to players in order to retain them. You can't have it both ways.We can make an excuse for every situation.
Not retaining Mathieu (one T), is part of a larger issue. I'm not sure how else to say this - he shouldn't have rewarded Tyrann with a major contract following injury that would become completely untenable if Ty wasn't playing at an All-Pro level. Unfortunately he did, and it was taken as disrespect.I'm not making an excuse for every situation, I'm responding to your specific claims. You said "There's no way [for Matthieu] to know what he would have gotten on the open market." That is patenly false. You said that Keim doesn't "[get] a pass on not retaining talent" in this case, but either he does, or you should support giving way above market contracts to players in order to retain them. You can't have it both ways.
There are scores of threads on Keim being a bad GM, and I'm not in there refuting that. But not retaining Matthieu is a poor example of something to hold against him.
...dave
You’re right. I figured the $9m chopper said was what he got for a 1 year deal. For that price he would’ve been worth the gamble to see if he could come back. Paid more for Suggs who is 9 years older. Golden will make more this FA period.He only got $3.75 from NY, we could've swung that.
Sent from my Moto G Play using Tapatalk