Matt Millon one of the top GM's in all of sports according to Forbes?

azdad1978

Championship!!!!
Joined
Dec 8, 2002
Posts
14,982
Reaction score
50
Location
ordinance 2257
Kevin Michale, the same guy who cost the Wolves a couple of draft picks in the past and not trying to surround a better cast around KG one of top GM's? Matt Million the same guy who drafted 3 WR in the past 3 drafts? This list is a joke.
 

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
thats the same thing they said on the radio yesterday when they found it, graves is 69
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
Kevin Michale, the same guy who cost the Wolves a couple of draft picks in the past and not trying to surround a better cast around KG one of top GM's? Matt Million the same guy who drafted 3 WR in the past 3 drafts? This list is a joke.

As we all know the Cards did almost the same thing. The only difference is that ours worked out Detroits' didn't.
 

Zeno

Ancient
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
15,603
Reaction score
5,468
Location
Fort Myers
If you read the article it breaks down how they do it...its the top 100 GMs in the 4 major sports which is what like 120? Matt Millen is 96 out of 100...Rod Graves is 69 according to their rankings only 8 Gms are worse than Graves in the NFL and Millen is 3rd from the bottom.

Its not the TOP GMs in sports its a ranking system of all of them.

But I have to question how Ozzie Newsome and Mike Brown are rakned below Graves though.
 

AntSports Steve

Cardinals Future GM
Joined
May 16, 2002
Posts
1,119
Reaction score
0
Location
Scottsdale, Arizona
It's simple. Forbes is a money magizine. Their ranking system is based on how well the GMs handle the money. I'm guessing that they didn't include much on how well the team actually did in the wins department. Instead they probably looked at ticket sales, contracts, etc.
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,270
Reaction score
5,426
Location
Nashville TN.
It's simple. Forbes is a money magizine. Their ranking system is based on how well the GMs handle the money. I'm guessing that they didn't include much on how well the team actually did in the wins department. Instead they probably looked at ticket sales, contracts, etc.

Well if that were the case Graves would be #1.
 

Zeno

Ancient
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
15,603
Reaction score
5,468
Location
Fort Myers
It's simple. Forbes is a money magizine. Their ranking system is based on how well the GMs handle the money. I'm guessing that they didn't include much on how well the team actually did in the wins department. Instead they probably looked at ticket sales, contracts, etc.

They did, nowhere in there did it say Graves or Millen were among the best GMs in sports...they listed the top 100 from the 4 major sports...if you JUST look at the NFL teams Graves is 8th from the bottom and Millen is third from the bottom.

The rankings were looked at without looking at the details of it.

From the article itself...

"Our rankings compare each general manager to the final three years of his predecessor's tenure in two categories: (1) performance (regular season winning percentage and playoff win totals) and (2) payroll spending (relative to the league median). Performance counts twice as much in our scoring as payroll spending. Scores account for all teams where the GM held the office and are indexed to 100. A score of 120 in winning improvement means the GM won 20% more games than his predecessor. A score of 80 in payroll containment means the GM spent 20% more than the previous GM relative to the league median"
 
Last edited:

Zeno

Ancient
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
15,603
Reaction score
5,468
Location
Fort Myers
If you read that it means that Rod Graves has not improved our winning percentage compared to the previous GM (Ferguson?) and that the team now spends 4% more than it did then (as compared to the league median).

Matt Millen by contrast has a winning % that is 45% worse than his predecessor and spends 4% less.

Edit: Its only 98 total GMs as explained here...

"Only the 98 current GMs with at least three years of service were reviewed."

So Millen being 96 out of a possible 98 doesn't make him one the Top GMs in Sports...quite the contrary. Graves being #69 isn't exactly a shining example either.
 
Last edited:

Diamondback Jay

Psalms 23:1
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Posts
4,910
Reaction score
1
Location
Mesa
Do the people who actually compiled this list actually pay attention to sports?

Kevin McHale? The Best GM? The same Kevin McHale who put Minnesota in to salary cap hell, and has the Timberwolves hovering around the toilet, with no chance of improvement until Kevin Garnett is traded? The same Kevin McHale who squandered draft picks by tampering to sign Joe Smith? Joe Friggin Smith??

Matt Millen? Yeah. That record indicates he's one of the best GMs in football.

Billy King? He's a great GM.. So good, Sixer fans want him on the first bus out of town.

This list is lousy.
 

Espo

Lets Go Suns
Joined
Oct 18, 2003
Posts
1,664
Reaction score
0
Location
Chandler
Do the people who actually compiled this list actually pay attention to sports?

Kevin McHale? The Best GM? The same Kevin McHale who put Minnesota in to salary cap hell, and has the Timberwolves hovering around the toilet, with no chance of improvement until Kevin Garnett is traded? The same Kevin McHale who squandered draft picks by tampering to sign Joe Smith? Joe Friggin Smith??

Matt Millen? Yeah. That record indicates he's one of the best GMs in football.

Billy King? He's a great GM.. So good, Sixer fans want him on the first bus out of town.

This list is lousy.
This seemed to be from a business perspective and even then it didn't make a whole lot of sense. Glad I don't regularly turn to Forbes for my sports advice. Hopefully the Mr. B doesn't either otherwise Matt Millen could be on his way here. jk
 

Diamondback Jay

Psalms 23:1
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Posts
4,910
Reaction score
1
Location
Mesa
General managers were graded on two things: performance vs. the performance of their predecessor, and payroll relative to the league median when compared to their predecessor. Because winning is more important than payroll, Forbes.com double-weighted winning percentage to penalize a GM who cut costs but also hurt his team's winning percentage.

McHale earned the top spot, according to Forbes.com, by leading Minnesota to eight playoff berths and a .539 regular-season win percentage. The Timberwolves won less than 25 percent of their games before McHale arrived.

Minnesota salaries have climbed 19 percent more than the median NBA salary during his tenure.

I've read it, and I'm still not buying it. Sorry.
 
Last edited:

phillycard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 22, 2003
Posts
7,268
Reaction score
4,252
Location
The 215
Do the people who actually compiled this list actually pay attention to sports?

Kevin McHale? The Best GM? The same Kevin McHale who put Minnesota in to salary cap hell, and has the Timberwolves hovering around the toilet, with no chance of improvement until Kevin Garnett is traded? The same Kevin McHale who squandered draft picks by tampering to sign Joe Smith? Joe Friggin Smith??

Matt Millen? Yeah. That record indicates he's one of the best GMs in football.

Billy King? He's a great GM.. So good, Sixer fans want him on the first bus out of town.

This list is lousy.

Billy King is a genius!!! :rolleyes:
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,113
Posts
5,433,417
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top