Matt Williams is gone

IndyDevil

Defensive liability
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
588
Reaction score
0
Location
Indiana
Wow...

I'm stunned by this move - not that it is a bad move, but that management actually did it!! Of course, after last night's fiasco I dreamt I would wake up and hear that Myers was released, Dessens went down to Tucson, and that BB got whacked - - they still have one more roster move to make today, so does anyone have a guess? I really would love to see Dessens get sent down and reprogrammed, but our rotation can't afford it....then again, we could probably throw in someone to give up early inning runs like Elmer, right?
 
Last edited:

Forrestham

Freebird62
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Posts
453
Reaction score
0
This is absoulutely the right move. I am so glad they had the balls to do it. It is a move that needed to be done. Roster moves had to be done and the only infielder that could be sent down is Cintron. After his game last night there would have been a mutiny by the fans. I could see Matt moaping and pouting on the bench. I know this was not Brenly's decision. While it is managements fault by giving him such a contract, they at least knew it was time to cut their losses.
 
OP
OP
M

mark1

Veteran
Joined
Dec 16, 2002
Posts
457
Reaction score
0
My guess is that Wohack will go when Counsell comes back. BB better start Cintron at short everyday for the rest of the year. The guy can hit and needs to play everyday.
 

FORKTUNG

Registered
Joined
Jul 7, 2002
Posts
335
Reaction score
2
Location
East Valley
Better late than never

Well as it all comes down I hope Williams 2 months he had here this year was worth it to him. His kids are out of school now so he can go play anywhere, heh. *Can* being the keyword if somebody wants to pick him up.

Grace has been a good tutor for Lyle but with Williams and his sulking I think it's best not to poison the waters with Hilly coming on board.
 

RLakin

All Star
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
572
Reaction score
0
Location
North Glendale
Originally posted by Forrestham
I could see Matt moaping and pouting on the bench.

No doubt this was the reason why they released him. I'll commend management for executing the move four years in the making, but it's funny (to me) that a public disclosure of such info about Williams wasn't needed. Seems like that was the case w/ Durazo and Kim. Now, I realize that those moves needed justification, while Williams’ clearly does not. Still, it doesn’t seem right to me that the professional reputations of young players like Kim (recently) and Durazo were called into question while a aging baby like Williams gets a graceful (and silent) exit.
 

AZ Shocker

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 5, 2002
Posts
1,271
Reaction score
71
Location
E. Valley
Hallelulah! Too bad Matt never wanted to become a "hitter" ala Mark Grace or Craig Council. He never tried to just hit the ball. Always wanted the long ball. Well Matt, after 3 years of pitchers not giving you "your" pitch to hit, you should've figured it out by now. Especially given the fact you've been in baseball for so long. One word will describe Matt Williams for me the rest of my life that unfortunently ruins the good career he had..."Stubborn"
 

AZZenny

Registered User
Joined
Feb 18, 2003
Posts
9,235
Reaction score
2
Location
Cave Creek
Let's see, RLakin - Bickley called him an "enraged bear in the clubhouse" last week, and had an article a couple days ago saying he is a bad clubhouse influence when he's struggling or not playing and needs to be gone; even Dave Burns came out and said Matty was a problem guy - it was a short, fast campaign - probably because there weren't going to be many fans upset by losing him.

I am thrilled by this move. JC has come back from vacation! Now...think we could sell Elmo to Japan??
 

RLakin

All Star
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
572
Reaction score
0
Location
North Glendale
Originally posted by AZZenny
Let's see, RLakin - Bickley called him an "enraged bear in the clubhouse" last week, and had an article a couple days ago saying he is a bad clubhouse influence when he's struggling or not playing and needs to be gone; even Dave Burns came out and said Matty was a problem guy - it was a short, fast campaign - probably because there weren't going to be many fans upset by losing him.

I read Bickley's column. It was very good, and addressed the issue that I'm talking about. Other than that, I hadn't heard anything. The Dave Burns comments are news to me. When did he say that?
 

Smolder

Veteran
Joined
Nov 22, 2002
Posts
160
Reaction score
0
holey moley batman! they shot down the mattbatross! geezus, this is so great. i don't mind losing kim if that's the price of getting rid of matbatross. man, i'm so happy. it's almost better than winning the world series! :D
 

moviegeekjn

Registered
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
502
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix
Sitting here in San Diego before heading towards the Q, first heard the word via ESPN and very glad to see the team make the hard choice to do the right thing.

Saw Bickley's column Friday, and then seeing Cintron playing 3rd began to think perhaps this could come true... It explains the little signs of emotion I witnessed between Gracie and Matty after they scored the tying and go-ahead runs last night... a brief exchange just before they got to the dugout. Not sure the TV caught it.. I just happened to be sitting right above where they came in.

A clear signal that the D'backs are serious about improving and not going to make all their decisions based on sentiment.
 

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
31,609
Reaction score
28,483
Location
Nowhere
Do you think he will retire or go else where, because in the Chicago Tribune said that Dusty Baker would like to see what he has left and that he could do no worse the Mark Bellhorn.
 

sly fly

Devil Me This
Joined
Jun 12, 2002
Posts
2,469
Reaction score
0
Location
N. Phx
Saw Bickley's column Friday, and then seeing Cintron playing 3rd began to think perhaps this could come true... It explains the little signs of emotion I witnessed between Gracie and Matty after they scored the tying and go-ahead runs last night... a brief exchange just before they got to the dugout. Not sure the TV caught it.. I just happened to be sitting right above where they came in.

Yeah, the TV caught it.

The right decision was made. Many of you are glad he's gone. But, he was still a Dback. And, I don't think I've ever seen him take a play off.

His quality of play at the plate left a lot to be desired. His fielding was "Matt Williams-like".

It's hard to feel sorry for a guy who still has $10 mil left on his contract.

Thanks for the memories, Matt! Good or bad.
 

AzKarl

Veteran
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
444
Reaction score
0
Location
Tempe,Arizona
Originally posted by sly fly
Saw Bickley's column Friday, and then seeing Cintron playing 3rd began to think perhaps this could come true... It explains the little signs of emotion I witnessed between Gracie and Matty after they scored the tying and go-ahead runs last night... a brief exchange just before they got to the dugout. Not sure the TV caught it.. I just happened to be sitting right above where they came in.

Yeah, the TV caught it.

The right decision was made. Many of you are glad he's gone. But, he was still a Dback. And, I don't think I've ever seen him take a play off.



Yeah Sly, he never took a day off, just a couple of seasons with injuries and pukey play. Goodbye and don't let the door hit you. If he was becoming a clubhouse cancer the last thing you want is a sulky veteran around young players.
His quality of play at the plate left a lot to be desired. His fielding was "Matt Williams-like".

It's hard to feel sorry for a guy who still has $10 mil left on his contract.

Thanks for the memories, Matt! Good or bad.
 

Skkorpion

Grey haired old Bird
LEGACY MEMBER
Supporting Member
Joined
May 9, 2002
Posts
11,026
Reaction score
5
Location
Sun City, AZ
The move is three months late but at least the team finally made it and I commend management for it.

We may not win but it was exciting to see all those new young pitchers and a restructured lineup.
 

Dback Jon

Doing it My Way
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
82,655
Reaction score
42,633
Location
South Scottsdale
Thanks for the memories, Matt - you are an original Dback.





That being said, good move.
 

CardNots

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Posts
5,022
Reaction score
5,558
Location
Jenks, Oklahoma
Matt,
Good bye. Here's what only thinking of yourself will do... Don't let the door hit you in the butt on the way out...
 

Strong Bad

All Star
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Apr 19, 2003
Posts
574
Reaction score
0
Is Williams considered an original Dback? He was traded for (Travis Fryman) after the expansion draft.

Regardless, the article says he was designated for reassignment. Doesn't that mean he ws sent to AAA Tucson or some other place?

How does this reassignment fit in with his reasons for not wanting to be traded to Colorado? I guess if he is to be consistent with why he said he refused the trade to Colorado he will refuse the reassignment and all other offers to play for teams looking for an extra bat down the stretch run.
 

moviegeekjn

Registered
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
502
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix
Means he was put on the bench at home... and the D'backs had 10 days to trade him. Those days are up, so essentially Matt is no longer a D'back--he's a free agent and can go wherever he chooses (probably at league minimum). The D'backs are still obligated to pay him the remainder of his contract.
 

schillingfan

All Star
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
672
Reaction score
0
Location
Northeastern Pennsylvania
If he was designated for assignment he does have a choice. It's not an outright release. Since he is a 10 and 5 player he can refuse the assignment to Tucson, but still keep the money. He also could accept the assignment to Tucson if he so wished, but of course he presumably will look for another major league team.

 

Forum statistics

Threads
556,061
Posts
5,431,319
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top