Harry
ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
It’s not possible without an awesome off-season but if he can win more than he loses, he’ll amaze me. This is a much tougher schedule than last year. BTW I can’t imagine him accomplishing this.
Arguing to argue from you?
Too -
It’s not possible without an awesome off-season but if he can win more than he loses, he’ll amaze me. This is a much tougher schedule than last year. BTW I can’t imagine him accomplishing this.
That's "Nickelodeon VP QB Mitch Trubisky."notice... you didn't respond to my point. so, I'll ask again.
do you believe the league, as a marketing machine preferred that awful Bears team in the playoffs with Tribuski QB'ing them on a road to nowhere or Kyler and the Cardinals as the up and coming young QB who dazzles with his feet and can make plays out of nothing?
if you really think the league wanted a boring Mitch Trubisky led Bears team in the playoffs over Kyler Murray youre drinking drano or just arguing to argue.
Not sure what the original point was, but as far as what "the league preferred"... the fact that the Bears have the 8th best fan base from an economic and marketing standpoint, while Cardinals fans are ranked 25th, surely had to be a significant factor.notice... you didn't respond to my point. so, I'll ask again.
do you believe the league, as a marketing machine preferred that awful Bears team in the playoffs with Tribuski QB'ing them on a road to nowhere or Kyler and the Cardinals as the up and coming young QB who dazzles with his feet and can make plays out of nothing?
notice... you didn't respond to my point. so, I'll ask again.
do you believe the league, as a marketing machine preferred that awful Bears team in the playoffs with Tribuski QB'ing them on a road to nowhere or Kyler and the Cardinals as the up and coming young QB who dazzles with his feet and can make plays out of nothing?
notice... you didn't respond to my point. so, I'll ask again.
do you believe the league, as a marketing machine preferred that awful Bears team in the playoffs with Tribuski QB'ing them on a road to nowhere or Kyler and the Cardinals as the up and coming young QB who dazzles with his feet and can make plays out of nothing?
In Football obsessed America it makes little difference.
Fans watch!
P.S. Chicago is the 3rd largest TV market.
I thought so too when i first saw it. But actually, based on this season's win totals, the Cardinals' 16-game strength of schedule is ranked 15th (tied with 3 other teams) at 127-129 = 0.496. Adding in the Browns as a 17th opponent raises the SoS to 138-134, or 0.507. Either way, middle of the pack.Have you seen next season’s schedule? It’s brutal
eh... looks like I was wrong. Chicago/New Orleans got the biggest ratings of all the games on Wild-Card Weekend.
Bears are a larger market so yes, they would prefer the Bears. More eyes.
Your point is well taken on hyping Kyler
In Football obsessed America it makes little difference.
Fans watch!
P.S. Chicago is the 3rd largest TV market.
He has got to get to the playoffs.
The NFL was banking on Arizona being a wildcard and when they couldnt get that, fellow owners were looking at Bidwill crazy.
I dont think he has 5 years, he has next year to get his act together or him and Keim are out the door
I put make the playoffs.
But more importantly that we are improving as the season goes along all the way to the end.
I don't want to see us melt again towards the end.
Shows that the coaching staff is losing the team and not making adjustments.
We have seen this ineptitude for 2 years in a row.
What makes us think he will change?
I thought so too when i first saw it. But actually, based on this season's win totals, the Cardinals' 16-game strength of schedule is ranked 15th (tied with 3 other teams) at 127-129 = 0.496. Adding in the Browns as a 17th opponent raises the SoS to 138-134, or 0.507. Either way, middle of the pack.
Yep, it's a little tougher than the 2020 schedule (121-134-1 = 0.475). But the NFC North has Green Bay and 3 poor to mediocre teams, the AFC South has two good teams and two terrible teams, and of the other teams ranked 3rd in their divisions - Dallas, Carolina, and Cleveland - two should be very beatable. (Granted, the Cards lost to some of the "beatable" teams in 2020!) Some of the opponents will be better next season, some will be worse.
Simplifying further: Outside of the division, 3 opponents were above .500 this year (4 if you add Cleveland), 6 were below .500, and Chicago was .500. Not so scary, really.
Manage 3-3 vs. the NFC West, beat the .500 & under teams outside the division, and the Cards end up 10-7. Or go 2-4 in the NFC West again and lose to the .500 and up teams outside the division, and end up 8-9.
...dave
With Hopkins and Murray you better be making the divisional round or you are just the Texans redux.
NAILED IT!!What needs to happen is that our offense has to be consistently better & EXPLOSIVE week to week. Exactly why I’ve said we need to put all our emphasis on the offense this offseason. At least fix one side of the ball. And because we have so much invested in Kyler, it has to be the offense. If the offense is a top 5-10 offense, then KK will stay. As long as our record is close to .500. If this happens, we’ll lose mainly because of the D, and Joseph will be fired by himself.