- Joined
- Apr 2, 2004
- Posts
- 37,010
- Reaction score
- 16,905
I don't know if anybody saw this but overall it was a fairly positive preview. They did take one shot at us for letting Amare go by pointing out that we'd be a championship contender with our additions had we kept him. Actually, it was an uninformed cheap shot because they made it seem like keeping Amare was an option along with acquiring Hedo, Warrick and Childress.
The thing that concerned me the most though was a comment by Nash. He was trying to sound at least neutral if not positive but he basically acknowledged what many of us have been saying.
Nash said
I know that's a fairly innocuous statement but his choice of words is revealing IMO.
Steve
The thing that concerned me the most though was a comment by Nash. He was trying to sound at least neutral if not positive but he basically acknowledged what many of us have been saying.
Nash said
If we build a team we can overcome the loss of an individual but, if we don't come together as a team, I think it's going to be glaring what we miss with Amare out of here.
I know that's a fairly innocuous statement but his choice of words is revealing IMO.
Steve
Last edited: