Next man up is Brock? Not Murphy.

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,563
Reaction score
25,562
Remember Murphy isnt practicing until June when UW finally gets done with its semester. This means nothing. Murphy isnt even there, so of course Brock has first crack at it.
 

Kai

Veteran
Joined
Mar 14, 2019
Posts
267
Reaction score
62
Location
Tucson
Remember Murphy isnt practicing until June when UW finally gets done with its semester. This means nothing. Murphy isnt even there, so of course Brock has first crack at it.
Good for him, is he graduating?
 

Cardinal

All Star
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Posts
639
Reaction score
731
Location
State Farm Stadium
Cardinals already brought Claiborne in for a visit but signed Brock instead.

It makes sense that Brock is going to get the first shot to start since he played for Vance Joseph last season.

Who knows? Maybe now that PP21 is suspended they’ll bring Claiborne back in.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
11,917
Reaction score
26,027
Location
Orlando, FL
I like Murphy better starting as the nickel. I’ve see too many corners get blitzed early in their career and not recover. More than others the corner position requires a secure ego. I prefer letting corners get used to the speed of the game before they have to cover a top receiver.
 

Kai

Veteran
Joined
Mar 14, 2019
Posts
267
Reaction score
62
Location
Tucson
I like Murphy better starting as the nickel. I’ve see too many corners get blitzed early in their career and not recover. More than others the corner position requires a secure ego. I prefer letting corners get used to the speed of the game before they have to cover a top receiver.
& bc his height (5'11'')
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,593
Reaction score
58,006
Location
SoCal
& bc his height (5'11'')
When did 5’11 become short for a cb? It used to be 5’11-6’0 was good height for a cb. But now it’s short? I know outside WRs have been growing in stature, but I don’t consider 5’11 short for a cb. It’s certainky not y’all, but I don’t consider it short.
 

Kai

Veteran
Joined
Mar 14, 2019
Posts
267
Reaction score
62
Location
Tucson
When did 5’11 become short for a cb? It used to be 5’11-6’0 was good height for a cb. But now it’s short? I know outside WRs have been growing in stature, but I don’t consider 5’11 short for a cb. It’s certainky not y’all, but I don’t consider it short.
It's because shorter people tend to have shorter arms, which affects the ability to jam receivers up at the line *for outside receivers
For slot corners 5'11'' is fine
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,466
Location
Charlotte, NC
When did 5’11 become short for a cb? It used to be 5’11-6’0 was good height for a cb. But now it’s short? I know outside WRs have been growing in stature, but I don’t consider 5’11 short for a cb. It’s certainky not y’all, but I don’t consider it short.

Aeneas was 5'11.

I like corners to be between 5'11 and 6'1.

6'2 and above are usually to stiff in the hips. Below 5'11 and they are giving up too much length.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
553,687
Posts
5,410,707
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top