- Joined
- May 13, 2002
- Posts
- 38,563
- Reaction score
- 25,562
Remember Murphy isnt practicing until June when UW finally gets done with its semester. This means nothing. Murphy isnt even there, so of course Brock has first crack at it.
Good for him, is he graduating?Remember Murphy isnt practicing until June when UW finally gets done with its semester. This means nothing. Murphy isnt even there, so of course Brock has first crack at it.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/profoo.../06/nfl-afca-agree-to-change-may-16-rule/amp/Remember Murphy isnt practicing until June when UW finally gets done with its semester. This means nothing. Murphy isnt even there, so of course Brock has first crack at it.
& bc his height (5'11'')I like Murphy better starting as the nickel. I’ve see too many corners get blitzed early in their career and not recover. More than others the corner position requires a secure ego. I prefer letting corners get used to the speed of the game before they have to cover a top receiver.
When did 5’11 become short for a cb? It used to be 5’11-6’0 was good height for a cb. But now it’s short? I know outside WRs have been growing in stature, but I don’t consider 5’11 short for a cb. It’s certainky not y’all, but I don’t consider it short.& bc his height (5'11'')
It's because shorter people tend to have shorter arms, which affects the ability to jam receivers up at the line *for outside receiversWhen did 5’11 become short for a cb? It used to be 5’11-6’0 was good height for a cb. But now it’s short? I know outside WRs have been growing in stature, but I don’t consider 5’11 short for a cb. It’s certainky not y’all, but I don’t consider it short.
When did 5’11 become short for a cb? It used to be 5’11-6’0 was good height for a cb. But now it’s short? I know outside WRs have been growing in stature, but I don’t consider 5’11 short for a cb. It’s certainky not y’all, but I don’t consider it short.