NFL Scheduling Shadiness

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,631
Reaction score
30,386
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I was looking over this week's schedule and I noticed something funny: Seattle has a 4:05 Eastern kickoff even though they're playing on the East Coast. Look at their schedule, and they have a second 4:05 ET kickoff in December against Buffalo.

San Francisco has a 4:25 ET kickoff against New Orleans on November 25.

We've talked some about how the early kickoff for East Coast road games sometimes puts West Coast teams at a disadvantage.

Anyone want to guess how many Cards games on the East coast are pushed back to the afternoon?

:mulli:
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,470
Reaction score
40,066
Location
Las Vegas
None of course :mad:
 

crisper57

Open the Roof!
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Posts
14,950
Reaction score
1,019
Location
Phoenix, AZ
How about this? The Rams have 2 straight home games against teams coming in on short rest (SEA and AZ).
 

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
8,929
Reaction score
4,924
Location
Iowa
How about this? The Rams have 2 straight home games against teams coming in on short rest (SEA and AZ).

The Rams have a built in advantage due to their location. Their west coast and east coast flights are shorter. And the trips to NO, CHI, GB, MN, DET, IND, CIN, CLEVE and TN are very short.
 

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
How about this? The Rams have 2 straight home games against teams coming in on short rest (SEA and AZ).


Luck of the draw. StL could just as easily be coming here on short rest for TNF





Nothing to see here. we had a friigin cupcake schedule last year. Some teams have to play playoff contenders every week of the year. Our guys are professionals, they can handle whatever the schedule brings.
 

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
The Rams have a built in advantage due to their location. Their west coast and east coast flights are shorter. And the trips to NO, CHI, GB, MN, DET, IND, CIN, CLEVE and TN are very short.


They have a longer trip for divison games.

AZ, SF, Seattle are all hugging the west coast.

Stl should probably be in the AFCW or something
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,296
Reaction score
6,310
Location
Dallas, TX
Rams to NFC N
CHI to NFC E
Cowboys to NFC W

Never will happen though...because the Cowpies want their East rivals & Da Bears want their longtime rivals also. Makes sense but we all know what NFL power broker owners want & that's exactly what they get! :bang:
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,296
Reaction score
6,310
Location
Dallas, TX
Rams to NFC N
CHI to NFC E
Cowboys to NFC W

Never will happen though...because the Cowpies want their East rivals & Da Bears want their longtime rivals also. Makes sense but we all know what NFL power broker owners want & that's exactly what they get! :bang:
 

Fitz Rulz

Registered
Joined
Jul 20, 2009
Posts
1,122
Reaction score
0
Like Falcons should be in NFC E
and Dallas NFC S

stuff doesn't make sense

AFC seems more sorted out
 

A fan who cares

Veteran
Joined
Dec 2, 2011
Posts
493
Reaction score
0
Location
Mesa, AZ
Rams moving to LA makes all the sense in the world. They will have a nice cushiony field for our players to fall on when we're @rams and it's really close. Heck, us fans could carpool to LA every year!
 

THESMEL

Smushdown! Take it like a fan!
Joined
May 21, 2010
Posts
5,968
Reaction score
1,160
Location
Vernon
LA has a stadium deal approved this week. We may see the LA vikings as the Rams go to the NFCN
 
Top