Zona90 said:Loaiza for Contreras and cash.
Evil Ash said:Bad, bad trade for the White Sox IMO
MaoTosiFanClub said:I don't think so. I'm guessing the cash basically makes Contreras free and he's just as mediocre as Loaiza. Loaiza would not have been re-signed anyway so it gives the Sox more flexibility to sign Magglio. Works well for both teams.
MaoTosiFanClub said:I heard it's a four team deal:
Minnesota:
Derek Lowe
Cubs:
Nomar
Red Sox:
Doug Mientchavitch (Sp)
Orlando Cabrera
Matt Clement
Expos get:
Top prospects
Alex Gonzalez
MaoTosiFanClub said:You guys are right and my bad for believing internet BS. Apparently the Cubs gave up some pretty big prospects as opposed to Clement. I like what the Red Sox did more than the Cubs. Defense is that team's biggest problem and by adding Cabrera, Mientkhevich, and Dave Roberts they got much, much better. They'll still score plenty of runs without Nomar, who had become a burden.
Evil Ash said:I think it was a good trade for both the Cubs and Red Sox. Like you said they needed defense and got 2 good defenders (and still have plenty of good bats in the lineup). Nomar was a distraction since basically in a depression ever since news of him being involved in the A-Rod deal came out.
However, I expect that since he was traded Nomar will bounce back for the rest of the year. The Cubs needed offensive help desperately.
With Mark Prior's health in question, maybe they should move him to the bull pen the rest of the year??MaoTosiFanClub said:The main difference between the two trades if you ask me is that the Red Sox addressed their biggest problem, which was their defense. The Cubs have neglected to remove their biggest wart, which is their awful bullpen. LaTroy Hawkins and Kyle Farnsworth isn't going to cut it and if Cubs fans are holding out hope for Ryan Dempster, they're more delusional than I previosuly thought.