Official Post Game Thread

AndyO

Veteran
Joined
Jul 19, 2003
Posts
302
Reaction score
0
Location
Mesa, AZ
I guess today was the annual proof that the preseason means positively, absolutely nothing.

Was pleased at times with the offense that we showed, but the defense looked overmatched at times and the special teams was, well, atrocious.

But, it's just one.
 

jtav10

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
120
Reaction score
0
jeff had a good game. without him were not even in the game. he took the heat for his turnovers but that is a good offense. we will be fine.
 

Assface

Like a boss
Supporting Member
Joined
May 6, 2003
Posts
15,106
Reaction score
21
Location
Tempe
Originally posted by jtav10
jeff had a good game. without him were not even in the game. he took the heat for his turnovers but that is a good offense. we will be fine.

3 to 1 td/int ratio is not bad at all. To compare him to Jake is ridiculous. Blake right now is the #8 rated passer and outplayed Warner, Favre, Garcia, Brees, Bledsoe, Manning etc. Blake had ONE interception, and seriously how often does a pick get returned 74 yards for a touchdown? Culpepper had 2 or 3 fumbles, Warner had 5 or 6. He could have done better on a few things, but without him this isn't even a game.
 

Jersey Girl

Stand down
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2002
Posts
32,469
Reaction score
6,456
Location
Super Scottsdale
Well, looks like we all watched the same game because I agree with a lot of what has been said.

The special teams and defense looked terrible. Off with their heads!

But really. I thought Blake looked okay. He did really well in the first half. I didn't feel the need to hold my breath everytime he threw a pass for more than 15 yards.

Can't say enough about Anquan. Wow. I knew he would be good, but this is the first time I have actually seen him play. WOW. Way to go!

Emmitt did okay and I was happy to see Marcel get some carries and yardage. Barrett made some nice plays as well.

The false starts and delay of game penalties need to stop. Get it together!

There are some bright spots on this team, but it still needs a lot of work.
 
OP
OP
RugbyMuffin

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
Originally posted by jtav10
jeff had a good game. without him were not even in the game. he took the heat for his turnovers but that is a good offense. we will be fine.

Doubtful that we will be "be fine". WE looked really bad out there.

Threre is hope in some of our younger guys, but the guys who need to step it up. Are not doing so.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,332
Reaction score
29,664
Location
Gilbert, AZ
First, I take back all the question marks I raised about Anquan Boldin. He's halfway to the season that I projected for him, but yardage- and TD-wise. The guy is a playmaker, and a go-to wideout. I'm really excited to see how he performs now that teams have some game film on him, and against better corners. The real tragedy is that the guy couldn't buy any national pub. All he did was lead the league in yardage, and triple Charles Rogers's production.

Second, Mac is the problem, not the solution. The fact that this team seems unprepared to play every week under his tenure (something I'd never noticed under Tobin) falls squarely on the shoulders of Mac. The cover-your-eyes-awful special teams falls on the coaching, and why our special-teams coach wasn't replaced in this spring's housecleaning is beyond me. We have borderline starters as backups (at LB and OL), these people should be playing above-average on special teams. Combine that with the lack of a home-run threat in Kevin Kasper (there was no comparison between him and Eddie Drummond), and it's going to be a long season. Kasper made me wish for Mar Tay. Give the kid a look.

Third, our O-Line is S-O-F-T soft. If we built the "belly" of this team in the offseason, why was Chris Dishman in in the first quarter, after one injury? No excuse. Pass protection was only average, at best, and run blocking was god-awful. James Hodgins was a non-factor, and was not even the best fullback on the field that day.

Fourth, there was not enough blitzing. Did we send Adrian Wilson, possibly our best blitzing threat, once into the Detriot backfield? Did Levar Fisher ever come from the weak side? Detriot has a good offensive line, and it sure looked like we failed to attack it. I know our corners can't cover, but this D is not good enough, especially up front, to sit back in zones. There were times when Harrington had time to get to his fourth option before unloading the ball. The defense quit on the fourth quarter, and for good reason. They were playing on their heels all day.

Fifth, Jeff Blake looked good, but I don't know where his head was all day. He seems steady, but he definately didn't seem like the leader that Nidan and others have intimated that he is. He looked more like the disinterested player that Cbus has been talking about. The difference between his reaction and passion and Doug Johnson's on the following Atlanta game was telling.

Sixth, Emmitt Smith did a good job. I find myself much more comfortable with Smith on the field than Marcel, especially in the red zone. He spent way too much time in blitz pickup. I didn't ever see him going out into the flat to take advantage of the Lions' young linebackers.

Overall, it was a good half of play, but the wheels came off in the second half, and this team can't come back from two-score deficits. This team doesn't look like a 3-win team, but it looks a lot like a 6-win team. The problems with playcalling and false-starts should work themselves out before the Seattle game (I hope), but the defense looked like a shadow of what we saw in the preseason. If Mac's not in control of the defense right now, he should take control immediately, because at this rate, if Marmie's making the decisions, it's going to cost Mac his job.
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
20,712
Reaction score
14,479
Location
Chandler, Az
Originally posted by kerouac9
Second, Mac is the problem, not the solution. The fact that this team seems unprepared to play every week under his tenure (something I'd never noticed under Tobin) falls squarely on the shoulders of Mac. The cover-your-eyes-awful special teams falls on the coaching, and why our special-teams coach wasn't replaced in this spring's housecleaning is beyond me. We have borderline starters as backups (at LB and OL), these people should be playing above-average on special teams. Combine that with the lack of a home-run threat in Kevin Kasper (there was no comparison between him and Eddie Drummond), and it's going to be a long season. Kasper made me wish for Mar Tay. Give the kid a look.

I agree that this loss belongs to the coaching staff. If over the next couple of games if this team looks as unprepared and plays as sloppy then it's the begining of the end for Mac.

Originally posted by kerouac9
Third, our O-Line is S-O-F-T soft. If we built the "belly" of this team in the offseason, why was Chris Dishman in in the first quarter, after one injury? No excuse. Pass protection was only average, at best, and run blocking was god-awful. James Hodgins was a non-factor, and was not even the best fullback on the field that day.

I agree that Chris Dishman doesn't belong out there. However they had no choice. Davis injured his ankle. Garcia is on suspension and Roundtree is still recovering from his Spleen thing. Not many other choices available.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,332
Reaction score
29,664
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Originally posted by MadCardDisease
I agree that Chris Dishman doesn't belong out there. However they had no choice. Davis injured his ankle. Garcia is on suspension and Roundtree is still recovering from his Spleen thing. Not many other choices available.

I don't know about that. There are always options. If J. McAddley is going to end up on IR anyway, pick up someone for the vet minimum and replace him in a week or four.

It's not like Graves and Mac didn't know that Garcia and Roundtree wouldn't be available, or that The Big Red Line is made of glass. They were unprepared for the predictable injury from a player that hadn't played a down in nine months, and that resides on the front office.
 

HIX

Brittney, Anna, Madonna
Joined
Aug 9, 2003
Posts
413
Reaction score
0
Location
In Anna I trust
What's with the dissin Kasper on the Returns?

AFC | NFC | NFL *Qualified | Overall
2003 | 2002 | 2001



Returning Leaders
KICKOFFS PUNTS
RNK NAME ATT YDS AVG TD LNG ATT YDS AVG TD LNG FC
1 Rod Smart, CAR 2 57 28.5 0 43 0 0 0.0 0 0 0
2 Kevin Kasper, ARI 5 136 27.2 0 37 0 0 0.0 0 0 0
3 Michael Lewis, NOR 4 96 24.0 0 37 4 31 7.8 0 9 3
4 E. Drummond, DET 5 119 23.8 0 33 3 77 25.7 1 57 1
5 John Avery, MIN 2 47 23.5 0 28 0 0 0.0 0 0 0
6 Allen Rossum, ATL 3 70 23.3 0 24




He has a 27 yard ave (5-6th from the top in the NFL) and would have had a higher one if it weren't for the holding penalties.

You should be concentrating on the DB and safteys. Talk about WEAK
 
Last edited:

Wild Card

Surfin' Bird
Joined
May 30, 2003
Posts
1,643
Reaction score
0
Location
Glendale, AZ
Originally posted by HIX
What's with the dissin Kasper on the Returns?

Returning Leaders
KICKOFFS PUNTS
RNK NAME ATT YDS AVG TD LNG ATT YDS AVG TD LNG FC
1 Rod Smart, CAR 2 57 28.5 0 43 0 0 0.0 0 0 0
2 Kevin Kasper, ARI 5 136 27.2 0 37 0 0 0.0 0 0 0
3 Michael Lewis, NOR 4 96 24.0 0 37 4 31 7.8 0 9 3
4 E. Drummond, DET 5 119 23.8 0 33 3 77 25.7 1 57 1

He has a 27 yard ave... and would have had a higher one if it weren't for the holding penalties.


HIX:

There are three certainties in life--death, taxes, and Kerouac bashing Kevin Kasper at every opportunity.

After one weekend, Kasper is ranked 2nd in the NFC for yards-per-return. That, with the Cardinals' horrendous special teams play. Who knows how effective Kasper might be, if the Cards blocking was better on kickoff returns? (In 2002, Kasper averaged 26.2 with Denver, but could only manage 22.6 with Arizona.)

Bottom line is, if the Cardinals' kicking, punting and punt return personnel had played as well as Kevin Kasper did yesterday returning kicks, the Cards would probably have won this game.

WC
 

AndyO

Veteran
Joined
Jul 19, 2003
Posts
302
Reaction score
0
Location
Mesa, AZ
Kasper may not be a TD threat every time he touches the ball, but he does gain good yardage almost everytime. He's about the only guy on special teams that can be counted on to perform. He's a plus for the squad, not one of the problems.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
If we're finished finger pointing, let's look forward and figure out what has to be done for the Cards to get back on track:

Blake - Work with Sully & crew on getting plays called faster. Work with Geep Chryst on getting in the habit of keeping both hands on the ball when moving around in the pocket or scrambling.

Bryant Johnson and Bryan Gilmore - Lots of jump ball and deep work with Blake and our secondary.

Offensive Line - More time spent on silent counts. Zero tolerance for false starts.

Defensive Line - Tanner and Davis need more work on leverage, anchoring and stuffing.

Linebackers - More work on coverages.

Secondary - Nothing but tight man coverage work and zone coverage work in the red zone.

Coaching Staff - Sully must work on getting plays to Blake much faster. Mac and Marmie have to immediately deal with defensive signal-stealing issues. Hoener should be working with Clement til 4 am if necessary to break him of the habit of false starts. Hank Kuhlmann had better have a greater sense of urgency toward getting his special units to play even to minimum standards. He needs to get his charges on the stick, and Mac has to make "Special Teams Improvement" a priority - time-wise, promotion-wise, compensation-wise.

Scouting Dept. - snuff out trade possibilities that might land us a CB or DT who's better than what we've got and don't be afraid to pull the trigger on a good deal.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
552,433
Posts
5,398,420
Members
6,313
Latest member
50 year card fan
Top