BC867
Long time Phoenician!
Bob Melvin appears to be following the path of Mike D'Antoni.
Who would have thought two years ago that D'Antoni would be forced out by top management for being a one-dimensional coach. Actually, some of us on the ASFN Suns board did.
Then he would be passed over by the team he wanted to coach, the Bulls, for the same reason.
D'Antoni and Melvin are not identical. But they are parallel.
Both have not shown skills in developing young players. D'Antoni actually said that it's not his job to develop them. Melvin's young players are among the league leaders in strikeouts.
Each is a "players' coach". Steve Nash ran the offense for D'Antoni. No one ran defense and rebounding. D'Antoni was too much a friend to his players (not a bad thing in moderation) and not enough of an authority figure.
Look at Amare Stoudemire's perfecting the parts of the game he wanted to and not the rest.
D'Antoni didn't allow his players to do their best. Their Power Forward played Center. Their two Small Forwards played Power Forward and backup Center. They put on an entertaining show during the season, but could not compete in the post-season.
Bob Melvin is managing American League style in the National League. No bunting or base stealing or hit and run. Everybody swing from the heels. Follow Eric Byrnes lead, with his wild one-handed uppercutting every pitch.
It's not how well you make contact or how hard you hit the ball. It seems to be how high you can hit it. Or how many times you can whiff.
Bob Melvin is extremely passive. Mike D'Antoni is extremely aggressive. But the results are the same.
Do we really want to see Upton (possibly the next Ken Griffey, Jr.), Young and Reynolds eventually putting up big numbers for other teams, just as Carlos Quinton is?
Do we really have to spend the next year or two waiting for our Manager of the Year (just as D'Antoni was Coach of the Year) to be forced out because he's not a complete coach?
Yes, I guess we do. Damnit.
Who would have thought two years ago that D'Antoni would be forced out by top management for being a one-dimensional coach. Actually, some of us on the ASFN Suns board did.
Then he would be passed over by the team he wanted to coach, the Bulls, for the same reason.
D'Antoni and Melvin are not identical. But they are parallel.
Both have not shown skills in developing young players. D'Antoni actually said that it's not his job to develop them. Melvin's young players are among the league leaders in strikeouts.
Each is a "players' coach". Steve Nash ran the offense for D'Antoni. No one ran defense and rebounding. D'Antoni was too much a friend to his players (not a bad thing in moderation) and not enough of an authority figure.
Look at Amare Stoudemire's perfecting the parts of the game he wanted to and not the rest.
D'Antoni didn't allow his players to do their best. Their Power Forward played Center. Their two Small Forwards played Power Forward and backup Center. They put on an entertaining show during the season, but could not compete in the post-season.
Bob Melvin is managing American League style in the National League. No bunting or base stealing or hit and run. Everybody swing from the heels. Follow Eric Byrnes lead, with his wild one-handed uppercutting every pitch.
It's not how well you make contact or how hard you hit the ball. It seems to be how high you can hit it. Or how many times you can whiff.
Bob Melvin is extremely passive. Mike D'Antoni is extremely aggressive. But the results are the same.
Do we really want to see Upton (possibly the next Ken Griffey, Jr.), Young and Reynolds eventually putting up big numbers for other teams, just as Carlos Quinton is?
Do we really have to spend the next year or two waiting for our Manager of the Year (just as D'Antoni was Coach of the Year) to be forced out because he's not a complete coach?
Yes, I guess we do. Damnit.