Oklahoma a must forfeit 2005 season ( football )

Southpaw

Provocateur aka Wallyburger
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Posts
39,818
Reaction score
3,410
Location
The urban swamp
Oklahoma must forfeit 2005 season ( football )

That is a biggie.

NCAA: Oklahoma must forfeit 2005 season

By MURRAY EVANS, Associated Press Writer 38 minutes ago

OKLAHOMA CITY - Oklahoma must erase its wins from the 2005 football season and will lose two scholarships for the 2008-09 and 2009-10 school years, the NCAA said Wednesday.

The penalties stem from a case involving two players, including the Sooners' starting quarterback, who were kicked off the team last August for being paid for work they had not performed at a Norman car dealership. The NCAA said Oklahoma was guilty of a "failure to monitor" the employment of the players.

Oklahoma President David Boren said the university will appeal the NCAA's "failure to monitor" finding and the ruling that Oklahoma must erase the wins from the 2005 season.

The Sooners went 8-4 and beat Oregon in the Holiday Bowl to end the 2005 season. Records from that season involving quarterback Rhett Bomar and offensive lineman J.D. Quinn must be erased, the NCAA said, and coach Bob Stoops' career record will be amended to reflect the erased wins, dropping it from 86-19 in eight seasons to 78-19.

Oklahoma also will have two years of probation added to an earlier penalty, extending the Sooners' probation to May 23, 2010.

Those sanctions are in addition to those already self-imposed by Oklahoma, which has banned athletes from working at the car dealership until at least the 2008-09 academic year and moved to prevent the athletes' supervisor at the dealership, Brad McRae, from being involved with the university's athletics program until at least August 2011.

Oklahoma also will reduce the number of football coaches who are allowed to recruit off campus this fall. The Sooners also dismissed Bomar, Quinn and walk-on Jermaine Hardison from the team.

Paul Dee, the athletic director at Miami and the interim chairman of the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions, said Oklahoma will be allowed to keep the money it received for playing in the 2005 Holiday Bowl, because the NCAA does not regulate bowl games.

"Although this case centered on a few violations involving three student-athletes, the committee finds this case to be significant and serious for several reasons," the NCAA report said, noting the length of time of the violations and the fact that Oklahoma had appeared before the committee in April 2006 regarding violations in its men's basketball program.

On Aug. 3 — the day before the Sooners began preseason practice — Stoops dismissed Bomar and Quinn from the team after the university determined they had been paid for work not performed at Big Red Sports and Imports.

That led to an NCAA investigation, which found that Bomar, Quinn and Hardison had been paid for time they did not work at the car dealership and that Hardison received payment for time he spent participating in a scrimmage and game.

The players and McRae engaged "in a deliberate scheme to deceive both the employer's payroll system and the university's employment monitoring system in an attempt to violate NCAA rules of which they were real aware."

The committee found that Oklahoma "demonstrated a failure to monitor" the employment of several athletes, including some football players who worked during the academic year. The NCAA said that failure led to the university not detecting NCAA rules violations.

During the investigation, the university disputed that allegation, arguing that the NCAA should applaud, not penalize, its efforts to root out violations and noted that NCAA president Myles Brand told one news outlet that the university "acted with integrity in taking swift and decisive action" in the case.

Dee said Wednesday that Oklahoma should be praised for quickly dismissing the players from the team, calling that action "very influential on the committee."

Still, the committee said that Oklahoma should have undertaken more extensive efforts to monitor the players' employment, because the dealership apparently was the largest employer of Oklahoma athletes.

Both Bomar and Quinn lost a season of eligibility. Bomar has been ordered by the NCAA to pay back more than $7,400 in extra benefits to charity, while Quinn was told to pay back more than $8,100. Both players transferred to Division I-AA schools — Bomar to Sam Houston State and Quinn to Montana — where they can resume their careers this season.

Through Sam Houston State athletic department spokesman Paul Ridings, Bomar declined comment Wednesday.

Oklahoma officials also appeared before the Committee on Infractions in April 2006 following an investigation into hundreds of improper recruiting phone calls by former basketball coach Kelvin Sampson's staff.

Oklahoma escaped major sanctions in that case, as the NCAA Committee on Infractions found the university guilty of a "failure to monitor," a less severe ruling than "lack of institutional control," which had been recommended by the NCAA's enforcement staff.

The committee moved Oklahoma's self-imposed probation so it would begin in May 2006 and end in May 2008. The NCAA also issued a public reprimand and censure but otherwise accepted the university's self-imposed sanctions, which included reductions in scholarships, recruiting calls and trips and visits to the school by prospective recruits.
 
Last edited:

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
86,195
Reaction score
36,320
I bet they wish Bomar had gone to Texas now.

And on the last part Sampson bolts for Indiana and promptly hires 2 coaches to sign Eric Gordon away from Illinois.
Clearly he learned his lesson.... not.
 

Skkorpion

Grey haired old Bird
LEGACY MEMBER
Supporting Member
Joined
May 9, 2002
Posts
11,026
Reaction score
5
Location
Sun City, AZ
Yeah, it's major cheating and Stoops got caught. But really, did anybody think Oklahoma ran a clean program? Ever? Come on.

Or Colorado? Or Texas? Remember SMU? Only Nebraska, in that conference, seems to make a real effort to keep it clean, and even they have always bent the rules to keep stars eligible and playing.

Oklahoma deserves the harsh penalties but it won't change anything.
 

Rivercard

Too much good stuff
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Posts
29,251
Reaction score
16,835
Location
Is everything
Oklahoma deserves the harsh penalties but it won't change anything.

It's not even that harsh of a punishment IMHO. Who cares about forfeiting their 2005 mediocre 8-4 season now? They did not have to forfeit the $$ earned from that bowl game or during the season. Business as usual.
 
OP
OP
Southpaw

Southpaw

Provocateur aka Wallyburger
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Posts
39,818
Reaction score
3,410
Location
The urban swamp
http://www.sportsline.com/columns/story/10255471

Great article. Rips the SEC pretty bad, saying everybody in the conference cheats. Wally, of course, will pull a Bill Clinton -- deny, deny.


My first response is , this is a POS article, poorly written and unsubstantiated.

Secondly, why is he defending Oklahoma? Oklahoma now has the ignominious distinction of having their basketball and football on probation with sanctions at the same time. That, in itself, speaks volumes about their lack of institutional control. Stoops is Coach Teflon. BTW, he nurtured and was educated in the SEC, where cheating is the norm.

Finally, why would anyone think I would defend the SEC? I enjoy watching SEC games, but am a devoted fan of Miami. Everyone knows the SEC cheats in recruiting, uses inducements and has some of the most blatant alumnae groups to be found. Just like Oklahoma, defending most teams in the SEC would be a waste of time as in defending the defenseless.

I found the article to be a waste of space and time. Nothing there except the author's opinion. Maybe he has specific basis for his candidates, but didn't bother with any level of specificity. Just seemed like name calling and deflection. But WTH, he got paid for the article and I ain't getting paid for my contribution to this thread. Bully for him.
 

DWKB

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
18,224
Reaction score
7,490
Location
Annapolis, MD
Finally, why would anyone think I would defend the SEC? I enjoy watching SEC games, but am a devoted fan of Miami.

Appearantly to the fan of the conferenceless team, Miami U is in the SEC and SMU is in the Big 12....:|
 
OP
OP
Southpaw

Southpaw

Provocateur aka Wallyburger
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Posts
39,818
Reaction score
3,410
Location
The urban swamp
Appearantly to the fan of the conferenceless team, Miami U is in the SEC and SMU is in the Big 12....:|

Isn't Notre Dame in the NBC Conference.
 
Last edited:
Top