- Joined
- Aug 19, 2005
- Posts
- 46,238
- Reaction score
- 11,830
smack shack
Wow, an amazing thread. How many series have the Spurs now won without being the better team. Is it 12 straight series where they either lucked out or the officials won it for them. By the way, we beat the better and more talented Suns in 5 games. You can hate the Spurs all you want, but the bottom line is they just keep winning. Saying you (the Suns), or the Hornets, or the Mavs, or the Pistons, or Lakers are the better team after the Spurs dispatch them makes you look whiney and petty. You keep the moral victories, we'll take the championships.
Without a doubt, the Hornets are the second best playoff team the Spurs have seen since 1999. Detroit 2005 is the best team.
spurs were the better team,not NOH with horrible shot selections.
and lakers were better team,not the jazz.
so despite we hate it,it's the fact
To paraphrase the former HC DA, we meant "better talented" roster. Spurs made much more use out of a less talented team to win the series vs. Suns (2x) and NO. That's credited to their coaching and experience. That's why the frustration with DA on many fans' part.
You're going soft on us.....?To be honest, the Spurs are growing on me, Horry can rot in hell, but I am really starting to appreciate the swagger they carry around. Parker is actually becoming one of my favorite players in the NBA. I love Pop as a coach as well. Yeah they are boring but they remind me of big brother slapping down little more talented brother. I can identify with that.
The Hornets had a lot of players injured for a long period of time.i agree their coach is good but i think we are underestimating their talent.
whatever uniform duncan-ginobili-parker trio wears,i think they ll be contenders regardless of the coach.
NOH does not have better roster than the spurs,if they did,why didnt they make the play off's last year?