- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 119,967
- Reaction score
- 60,521
No. It was reported widely at the time that the Suns had to do that deal to cut salary to satisfy the prospective ownershi group.
This is how I remember it as well.
No. It was reported widely at the time that the Suns had to do that deal to cut salary to satisfy the prospective ownershi group.
No. It was reported widely at the time that the Suns had to do that deal to cut salary to satisfy the prospective ownershi group.
This is how I remember it as well.
Only so the previous owners could line their pockets. Googs deal was expiring and the new group regardless of who it was wasn't going to have to worry about it. If they needed a league payout to settle their debts then it was so they could sell the team for more.
The Kings just found a buyer willing to pay off close to 70mil of local debt(plus another 30mil in relocation fees), meanwhile the Suns deal would have fallen through over a few million in league payout and 2 months of Gugliotta's prorated contract?
It's how it was reported but the debts could have been deducted from the final sale, instead the previous owners wanted to cash out.
JC on a radio interview said that one of the conditions of the sale was that the team reduce expenses. It was a requirement given by the new ownership group well a year in advance.
JC on a radio interview said that one of the conditions of the sale was that the team reduce expenses. It was a requirement given by the new ownership group well a year in advance.
That is a boatload of crap and giving Colangelo a free pass for everything is a joke.
He selected Sarver, that alone should be enough to blame him.
He left the franchise in a poor state. Had he not lucked out on Amare in the draft they would have been as bad as they are right now minus future picks.
So Sarver was willing to spend the $401 million valuation to buy the Suns, but only if the team cleared a few million dollars with the league payout? He wouldn't have been willing to buy the team at a lower price to off set those costs?
Either the previous owners were looking to make what they could back or they were complicit with any move that was made. Sarver wasn't the only person they could have sold to.
That's the amazing thing. We were so cheap again, we couldn't pay the luxury tax for Googs and the last 2 months of his contract, so we TRADE away picks to get rid of him.
That is a boatload of crap and giving Colangelo a free pass for everything is a joke.
He selected Sarver, that alone should be enough to blame him.
He left the franchise in a poor state. Had he not lucked out on Amare in the draft they would have been as bad as they are right now minus future picks.