We aren't the only team with issues with rookies.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/ten-biggest-nfl-rookie-busts-in-2015/ar-BBnD9pw
http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/ten-biggest-nfl-rookie-busts-in-2015/ar-BBnD9pw
Can't be a bust first year. Sorry.
Have to be considered at least a disappointment, if not a bust-in-waiting. Failing to make the active roster as a 1st-round pick? In an era where you pretty much need your 1st-rounders to contribute from the get-go? Meh.
Draft Projection Round 1
Sources Tell Us "He can probably come in and play right away, but I'm not quite as high on him as everyone else seems to be. I think he can be good but I don't see a Pro Bowl player." - NFL Director of Personnel
NFL Comparison D'Brickashaw Ferguson
Bottom Line An elite-level tackle when he exited the high school ranks, Humphries relies on his superior athleticism and fist-fight mentality rather than an improved skill set and steady technique. He might always have an issue with being a leaner, but his hand placement should improve with more work and coaching. When he improves in that area, he could become a solid NFL starter on the left side.
Humphries is by far biggest flop of the 1st round.
At least these other guys getting destroyed are on the field. DJ isn't even active on game day.
Flat dead wrong. He's sitting because our O Line is working just fine, and Arians' would rather pull off his toenails than change out his O Line in the playoff stretch for no reason at all.
The point is that he isn't even sitting--you have to dress to sit on the bench lol He can't even get the last backup spot on game day? As a 1st round pick? It gets ignored because we're having a great season and, as it stands today, it appears as if we can afford to completely whiff on a 1st rounder, so this isn't getting big headlines. But taking a 1st-rounder that can't beat out Sowell for the game day roster is sad.
If the Cards weren't having a great season, he'd be playing. To me, it's of no consequence whether he's active and not playing, or inactive. In fact, I'd rather have him inactive and use his spot on a guy that plays more than 1 position or a special team guy.
And you base this on...? To me, it's of huge consequence, because it tells me he's not good enough, that we don't have enough faith in him, for him to get any playing time at all. If, as you seem to think, the staff has faith in him being able to play, I'd figure he'd get a spot as a backup. He's not even a backup on game day, which is quite sad. And yes, it is of consequence, IMO, because not getting any game day experience, with or without playing time, will set him back. This just reeks of a bad pick to me.
I think you are passing judgment too soon. Remember Arians values experience and he also equates experience to making less mistakes which for Arians is more important than being a gifted yet error prone player. I also think having Humphries inactive is a head game he is playing with Humphries which he may feel will push him to get better at his technique which is also something that Arians believes in. Arians truly values a player that is dedicated to playing with flawless technique and dedicates to doing his job on the field and understanding what his responsibilities are for each and every play.
Early on in the draft process, I was all about Vic Beasley. Looks like it might be good I didn't get my wish.