I don't agree. They had him for 3 more years. No need to give in at all. He had NO leverage, only histrionics and attacks through his agent. But, again, another herding cats argument that won't be won on either side .
Kyler shouldn't have gotten extended is right, but it was 1 more year then the 5th year option, not 3. Most QB's get extended before the 5th, so it was 1 year "early."
But, you are gunna extend an unproven par to subpar coach and par to sub par GM and not your #1 overall pick QB? It's not like he's Zach Wilson here. The franchise would be a bigger clown show extending those two and not him.
The cap is increasing considerably soon and I don't think anyone could have truly anticipated this kind of collapse. His numbers won't look crazy in a couple years, it only looks that way now.
If they waited another year and even if Kyler was only decent, his extension would be much more than it is now. Did you follow the Dak extension? Cowboys lost like close to 5-10 million a year by waiting that extra year to sign him. That's the gamble.
Unless you feel he's not the answer at QB, which M.B. most absolutely does, you pay him now cause he would 100% be more expensive, as the cap and QB salaries are increasing every year. Do you think Keim and KK havd a job outside Kyler?