You can make the argument for four of the six South teams (UofA, ASU, USC, UCLA), but all have question marks attached to them.
UofA still has a big fat question mark in terms of size on the defensive line, how Bundage will adjust to the shift to center, and overall depth. We can ill-afford to sustain injuries.
ASU lost its best offensive and defensive players to the draft, and wideout seems to be a glaring weakness. Foster can only do so much.
USC has the most talent in the PAC-12. This is not up for debate. The question mark is how Seven-Shot Sark could flounder this opportunity after having all of its scholarships back. Can his abundance of talent overcome his lack of coaching prowess?
UCLA has tons of talent everywhere, but I think Josh Rosen's impact won't come until next season. He's gonna have to take his lumps as a true freshmen.
I took Utah off entirely because they have the worst QB in the South and have new coordinators on both sides of the ball.
And while Colorado is still the red-headed stepchild of the division, they're going to bite a couple of teams in the ass this season and play spoiler. Sefo Liufau is a very good quarterback and has one of the best WRs in the conference, perhaps in the country, in Nelson Spruce. Their one or two wins could come against any of the aforementioned teams if they choose to overlook them.
Should be another competitive season and it could very well come town to the Territorial Cup again.