Packers didn't run up the score after all.

nastynas

Newbie
Joined
Jan 3, 2010
Posts
12
Reaction score
0
Many have questioned the Packers for running up the score or padding stats. However, this isnt true at all. Aaron Rodgers finished second in Green Bay history falling short just 25 yards behind Lynn Dickey for the season yards passing record. On the other hand Fitz played until he scored a TD to break Cardinals TD record.

The Packers game was meaningless to the Cardinals. On the other hand the Packers had much to win. They had either the option to play and win securing a 5th seed or play their backups and have a chance at losing and playing as the 6th seed. The difference between 5 and 6 is that there is still an option for a home playoff game giving the season finale much meaning for the Packers.

Whiz has complained a few times and accused the Packers for running the score up on a meaningless game. However, if the game was meaningless I question why anyone has an issue with how the Packers played the game. The game was either meaningless and you dont care about the outcome or it was meaningful and you wish you had played better. Make up your mind Whiz.

Finally, McCarthy believes in playing full force throughout the season. Note in 07 when the Packers finished 13-3 they had the option to rest their starters in the final week but they played their starters and finished strong to help them roll into the NFC Championship. Whether the Cardinals agree or disagree is irrelevant to the way the Packers play. This is the way theyre coached and prepared. Has it ever occurred to Whiz that benching his starters early was disrespectful? Before he knocks one coach for his coaching preferences he should question his own.
 

WarnerHOF

Registered
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Posts
2,784
Reaction score
0
Nobody cares anymore, stop beating a dead horse. All I'm worried about is Sunday.
 

SoCal Cardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 11, 2004
Posts
6,056
Reaction score
1,296
Many have questioned the Packers for running up the score or padding stats. However, this isnt true at all. Aaron Rodgers finished second in Green Bay history falling short just 25 yards behind Lynn Dickey for the season yards passing record. On the other hand Fitz played until he scored a TD to break Cardinals TD record.

The Packers game was meaningless to the Cardinals. On the other hand the Packers had much to win. They had either the option to play and win securing a 5th seed or play their backups and have a chance at losing and playing as the 6th seed. The difference between 5 and 6 is that there is still an option for a home playoff game giving the season finale much meaning for the Packers.

Whiz has complained a few times and accused the Packers for running the score up on a meaningless game. However, if the game was meaningless I question why anyone has an issue with how the Packers played the game. The game was either meaningless and you dont care about the outcome or it was meaningful and you wish you had played better. Make up your mind Whiz.

Finally, McCarthy believes in playing full force throughout the season. Note in 07 when the Packers finished 13-3 they had the option to rest their starters in the final week but they played their starters and finished strong to help them roll into the NFC Championship. Whether the Cardinals agree or disagree is irrelevant to the way the Packers play. This is the way theyre coached and prepared. Has it ever occurred to Whiz that benching his starters early was disrespectful? Before he knocks one coach for his coaching preferences he should question his own.

Who are you to question Whiz?

The man took the ARIZONA FREAKING CARDINALS TO THE SUPERBOWL!

McCarthy could win 3 straight SB's and it would pale in comparison.

:D
 

Syracusecards

DA's pass went that way
Joined
Oct 27, 2004
Posts
4,344
Reaction score
4,556
Many have questioned the Packers for running up the score or padding stats. However, this isnt true at all. Aaron Rodgers finished second in Green Bay history falling short just 25 yards behind Lynn Dickey for the season yards passing record. On the other hand Fitz played until he scored a TD to break Cardinals TD record.

The Packers game was meaningless to the Cardinals. On the other hand the Packers had much to win. They had either the option to play and win securing a 5th seed or play their backups and have a chance at losing and playing as the 6th seed. The difference between 5 and 6 is that there is still an option for a home playoff game giving the season finale much meaning for the Packers.

Whiz has complained a few times and accused the Packers for running the score up on a meaningless game. However, if the game was meaningless I question why anyone has an issue with how the Packers played the game. The game was either meaningless and you dont care about the outcome or it was meaningful and you wish you had played better. Make up your mind Whiz.

Finally, McCarthy believes in playing full force throughout the season. Note in 07 when the Packers finished 13-3 they had the option to rest their starters in the final week but they played their starters and finished strong to help them roll into the NFC Championship. Whether the Cardinals agree or disagree is irrelevant to the way the Packers play. This is the way theyre coached and prepared. Has it ever occurred to Whiz that benching his starters early was disrespectful? Before he knocks one coach for his coaching preferences he should question his own.

I must have missed something. When did Whiz complain about the Packers running up the score?
 

PoolBoy

BIRDGANG
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Posts
5,734
Reaction score
0
Location
Sec. 450
you must have mistaken us with the packers board, because
You must be registered for see images attach
 

PJ1

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
12,271
Reaction score
5,427
Location
Nashville TN.
You people won't let up with this crap. Whiz said nothing about the Packers running up the score.
 

Cody

i love defense
Joined
May 3, 2005
Posts
901
Reaction score
0
i never understood the big deal about running up the score. they're grown men making millions. no need to cry if you're getting the score ran up.
 

Cody

i love defense
Joined
May 3, 2005
Posts
901
Reaction score
0
Who is crying about it?
in sports in general. some times you see on the talk shows or press conferences they'll bring up how they ran up the score and it wasnt good sportmanship.
 
OP
OP
N

nastynas

Newbie
Joined
Jan 3, 2010
Posts
12
Reaction score
0
"This past Sunday the Green Bay Packers locked up the #5 seed in the NFC after a 33-7 victory over the Arizona Cardinals in the final week of the NFL season. The Packers play the Cardinals this week in the first round of the NFC playoffs, for the third and final time this season.



But to Cardinals and their head coach Ken Whisenhunt have an issue with the Packers. Whisenhunt thinks the Packers rubbed it in week 17 during, as Whisenhunt called it, “a meaningless game”.

Whisenhunt pulled starting quarterback Kurt Warner early in the game and expected the Packers to do the same with Aaron Rodgers. But Packers head coach Mike McCarthy left Rodgers in until the Packers went up 26-0.

During the game the Cardinals had injuries occur to some of their key players. Wide Receiver Anquan Boldin (knee, ankle), cornerback Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie (knee) and defensive lineman Calais Campbell (thumb) are were injured in the game. Campbell is likely out after having thumb surgery Monday, while “DRC” is looking like he will play. Boldin is a game time decision (although ESPN’s Adam Schefter is reporting it looks like he will miss the game).



The Packers on the other hand took a gamble by playing most of their starters and came away with only a scare to Charles Woodson (shoulder sprain). He will be starting at cornerback on Sunday and if the game was close, said he would have been back in the game Sunday.

But the contrasting styles of the two coaches may have led to some bad blood between the two men and their teams. It started in the pre season when Whisenhunt took exception the McCarthy “game planning” for the Cardinals in week 3 of the pre-season when the two team s played. At halftime the Packers had a 38-10 lead.

This time, Whisenhunt seemed perturbed that McCarthy left Rodgers and the rest of the Packers starters in even though it was a “meaningless game” to both teams in his eyes since both team were in the playoffs and playing each other this week.



“They had their plan,” Whisenhunt said. “I guess they felt good about what they were doing.”

But Whisenhunt left his best player All-Pro wide receiver Larry Fitzgerald in for the entire game or until he scored a touchdown. Fitzgerald said he didn’t know why he was even in the game after other starters were pulled. Let’s not forget about Boldin who didn’t seem to be leaving the game until he got injured.

So why is he so upset that McCarthy left his guys in to reach certain statistical marks?

“It’s something you would feel sick about had (Fitzgerald) gotten injured at the end, but I have no doubt in my mind that’s what Green Bay was trying to do with Aaron Rodgers (on Sunday) as far as the passing statistics, trying to get those things,” Whisenhunt said. “That’s part of it.”



Isn’t that a little hypocritical?

It’s ok for Whisenhunt to leave his guys in, but not McCarthy, whose team was still playing for the #5 seed in the NFC since Dallas was throttling the Eagles who also ended up with an 11-5 record?

So how was it meaningless to the Packers? They finished the season 7-1 in their final eight games after a 4-4 start and are one of the hottest teams in the NFL. McCarthy wanted to keep his teams momentum heading into the post season and more importantly knows his team better than anyone else.



“I’m in charge of their pulse and make sure when they need to get kicked in the ass, that happens, and when they need to be picked up, that happens too,” said McCarthy. “We had some tough lessons that we encountered in the first eight weeks. We learned from them and we were able to put together eight weeks of good, quality football. I think the greatest strength of this football team is overcoming adversity.”

As McCarthy said, they kept both the offense and defense basic.

“We didn’t roll out everything we had, either,” said McCarthy. “Our principles are still the same, our base concepts are still the same. We’ve established who we are, the way we want to play, that will not change. Now, what you do, change the face of it, those types of things, that’s all part of the game planning.”

So it seems that the Packers just played harder than a Cardinals team that thought, like their head coach, the Packers would just go through the motions and mail in week 17.

But now the Cardinals are trying to use last weeks loss to the Packers as motivation. Cardinals DT Darnell Dockett said ”At the end of the day, if they want to celebrate it, then they can go ahead. It’s a tough team, and I’m pretty sure everybody is going to pick them to win. They played good. We were impressed, and hopefully we keep up with them this weekend.”

McCarthy also pointed out something that may be getting over looked. ”They’ve won their division two years in a row,” said McCarthy. “They have experience. They’re coming off of a Super Bowl run. They have playoff experience, pretty much their whole football team. Those are the things that play to their strengths.

“. . . . We’ll be totally in tune with the fact that playoff football is different. We have a group of men that experienced this two years ago. We have a group of men that have not experienced it.”

Mike McCarthy is in charge of the Green Bay Packers. He controls the Packers and only the Packers. He cannot be worried about what the Cardinals reaction is to the Packers playing hard for the entire game. He had no idea that Whisenhunt was not planning to play the game to win. That is not his concern, the Green Bay Packers are.

In fact, Dan Brickley of the The Arizona Republic said this of Whisenhunt’s game plan “The game plan was murky, illogical. It was built for safety and yet fraught with danger.”

So why is there any uproar over the Packers and Mike McCarthy doing what is best for them? They knew there was an injury risk if a starter, let’s say Aaron Rodgers went down with a serious injury. But it didn’t happen. The took a risk and they were not harmed by it.

If Ken Whisenhunt wants to be upset about anything he should be upset at the effort (or lack there of) from his own team or the game plan he (failed) to execute.

This could be the start of a new rivalry if both the Packers and Cardinals continue to make the playoffs. Both teams are young and explosive on offense. The NFL schedule makers may have been onto something when they placed the Packers in Arizona in August and in January.

Time will tell if that happens, but one thing is for sure, come Sunday afternoon in Glendale, Arizona both these teams will settle the score for the third, and final time on the field. But this time the losers come home crying for the good and there will be no fourth game."
 

Bert

Walkin' on Sunshine
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Posts
10,139
Reaction score
3,235
Location
Arizona
Whiz has complained a few times and accused the Packers for running the score up on a meaningless game.


When, exactly did Whisenhunt complain about your Packers 'running up the score'?

PS Calling him Whiz wont disguise you troll....
 
OP
OP
N

nastynas

Newbie
Joined
Jan 3, 2010
Posts
12
Reaction score
0
"The Packers are in Ken Whisenhunt's head
January, 6, 2010
JAN 6
11:04
AM ET
Email Print Share
By Kevin Seifert
Green Bay will return to the practice field Wednesday to continue preparations for Sunday’s wild-card playoff game at Arizona, meaning it’s time for us to transition from review mode to postseason mode. We’ll start it off by telling Cardinals coach Ken Whisenhunt to lighten up.

This column from Dan Bickley of the Arizona Republic suggests Whisenhunt is upset that the Packers ran up the score in two relatively meaningless games this year at University of Phoenix Stadium. I suppose there could be a level of media extrapolation here, but the claim is a joke regardless.

According to Bickley, Whisenhunt thought Packers coach Mike McCarthy needlessly game-planned for the teams’ preseason game in August, one the Packers led 38-10 at halftime. Apparently that violated some kind of unwritten preseason rule.

On that count, I strongly disagree. The third preseason game is usually the only August affair that NFL teams care about. It’s the closest to a regular season game as there is, and there are no articles of war. If McCarthy thought it was best for his team to work in a game-planning structure, he had every right to do it. If anything, a 28-point halftime deficit should have said more about the Cardinals than the Packers.

Meanwhile, Whisenhunt suggested McCarthy prolonged his starters’ playing time in last Sunday’s 33-7 victory to pad their statistics. At best, that claim has limited factual basis.

It’s true that quarterback Aaron Rodgers played long enough to pass Brett Favre for second on the Packers’ all-time list of most passing yards in a season. But if stat padding were truly a high priority, Rodgers would have continued playing. When he departed, Rodgers was only 25 yards away from passing Lynn Dickey for the No. 1 spot on that list.

I’m sure Whisenhunt doesn’t appreciate any suggestion that the Packers have manhandled his team this year.

But if the games were as meaningless as Whisenhunt apparently believes they were, then he shouldn’t be upset with the manner his team lost them. They either matter, or they don’t. As far as he should be concerned, the Packers and Cardinals will meet for the first time Sunday."
 

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
73,148
Reaction score
25,041
Location
Killjoy Central
“They had their plan,” Whisenhunt said. “I guess they felt good about what they were doing.”

Wow. Lighten up a little coach. That's a whole mess of complaining you're doing there. :rolleyes:
 

Bert

Walkin' on Sunshine
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Posts
10,139
Reaction score
3,235
Location
Arizona
"The Packers are in Ken Whisenhunt's head
January, 6, 2010
JAN 6
11:04
AM ET
Email Print Share
By Kevin Seifert
Green Bay will return to the practice field Wednesday to continue preparations for Sunday’s wild-card playoff game at Arizona, meaning it’s time for us to transition from review mode to postseason mode. We’ll start it off by telling Cardinals coach Ken Whisenhunt to lighten up.

This column from Dan Bickley of the Arizona Republic suggests Whisenhunt is upset that the Packers ran up the score in two relatively meaningless games this year at University of Phoenix Stadium. I suppose there could be a level of media extrapolation here, but the claim is a joke regardless.

According to Bickley, Whisenhunt thought Packers coach Mike McCarthy needlessly game-planned for the teams’ preseason game in August, one the Packers led 38-10 at halftime. Apparently that violated some kind of unwritten preseason rule.

On that count, I strongly disagree. The third preseason game is usually the only August affair that NFL teams care about. It’s the closest to a regular season game as there is, and there are no articles of war. If McCarthy thought it was best for his team to work in a game-planning structure, he had every right to do it. If anything, a 28-point halftime deficit should have said more about the Cardinals than the Packers.

Meanwhile, Whisenhunt suggested McCarthy prolonged his starters’ playing time in last Sunday’s 33-7 victory to pad their statistics. At best, that claim has limited factual basis.

It’s true that quarterback Aaron Rodgers played long enough to pass Brett Favre for second on the Packers’ all-time list of most passing yards in a season. But if stat padding were truly a high priority, Rodgers would have continued playing. When he departed, Rodgers was only 25 yards away from passing Lynn Dickey for the No. 1 spot on that list.

I’m sure Whisenhunt doesn’t appreciate any suggestion that the Packers have manhandled his team this year.

But if the games were as meaningless as Whisenhunt apparently believes they were, then he shouldn’t be upset with the manner his team lost them. They either matter, or they don’t. As far as he should be concerned, the Packers and Cardinals will meet for the first time Sunday."

Troll, you can post the same article over, and over and over again but you still haven't shown me Whisenhunt saying in any form that he was upset for "running up the score"

Support your claims with facts not biased crybaby Packer reporting. Why are you concerned with our coaches opinion?

Learn proper posting etiquitte. Fabricated accusations are not appreciated here.

Good luck on Sunday.
 

WarnerHOF

Registered
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Posts
2,784
Reaction score
0
This is just classic ESPN trying to start **** over nothing bad said.
 

ANDY440

Registered
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Oct 8, 2004
Posts
1,176
Reaction score
30
Location
Mesa
I'm glad Whiz is irked,although I don't take exception to what the Packers did. Maybe we unleash hells fury on them.......:D
 

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
8,929
Reaction score
4,924
Location
Iowa
This whole Whis is mad at McCarthy cr@p is a bunch of baloney. See this note posted by Kevin Seifert the ESPN NFC North blogger.

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_/id/8535/nfc-north-at-night-34

Speaking during a conference call with Wisconsin reporters, Whisenhunt clarified his original comments. “The only thing I was chafing about was the approach of my football team and how we handled it. I was disappointed with some of the things we did in the ball game as far as how we played. It was obvious to me that Green Bay was more physical than us. That’s what was very disappointing to me. I could see where [reporters] would think that I was irritated, and I was, but it certainly wasn't at coach McCarthy or the Packers. It was more about how we performed.”
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,113
Posts
5,433,434
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top