I say no. I say Curtis cannot fall over. Even if it was, no way it gets called on fourth and ten in the NFCCG.
I say no. I say Curtis cannot fall over. Even if it was, no way it gets called on fourth and ten in the NFCCG.
There is a specific rule for that right? Good call.I watched it repeatedly. I say HELL NO. That was a case of incidental foot tangling.
I say no. I say Curtis cannot fall over. Even if it was, no way it gets called on fourth and ten in the NFCCG.
I watched it repeatedly. I say HELL NO. That was a case of incidental foot tangling.
Good point. I was thinking about that same thing.It was absolutely pass interference....but it's amazing that Philly fans have the balls to whine about it after the blown "onside kick" call at the end of the 2nd quarter.
No way the refs are going to bail anyone out on a 4th down play to decide who goes to the Super Bowl. Hood tripped him, but Hood was going down so he could make the argument that the contact is incidental.
At the very least I see it as a make-up call for the colossal f**k-up by the refs on that kickoff.
Uh, it was Hood grabbing the guy's legs with his arms. You need a brief anatomy lesson if that looked like tangled feet!
You think Fitz, Q, Jerry Rice, <insert big time receiver here> falls down in that situation?"Grabbing"??? Take a closer look dude... Hood did of course "touch" Curtis's legs... But by no means did he "grab" his legs and there is NO WAY he did enough to force Curtis to fall to his knees...
You think Fitz, Q, Jerry Rice, <insert big time receiver here> falls down in that situation?
"Grabbing"??? Take a closer look dude... Hood did of course "touch" Curtis's legs... But by no means did he "grab" his legs and there is NO WAY he did enough to force Curtis to fall to his knees...
Yup.Nope... but even if they did, they make the catch. The pass was a perfectly thrown ball. Hit Curtis in his hands... You make the catch...
Yep. If this was against the Cards, no one says a word. Except to blame Cardsfan for whining.Do I need to go over all the bad calls that have gone against us in the past? If this was PI and not called so be it. I'm not sold on if it was PI anyway.
That is what I said.I say no. I say Curtis cannot fall over. Even if it was, no way it gets called on fourth and ten in the NFCCG.
I say no. I say Curtis cannot fall over. Even if it was, no way it gets called on fourth and ten in the NFCCG.
Everyone on ESPN and everywhere else I've seen said exactly this; "there was contact, but in that situation it wasn't nearly enough contact to throw a flag and regardless, he should have caught the ball anyways."
Exactly how I feel about it. Let them play, the dude shoulda caught the ball, plain and simple. I'm not a homer, I'm not denying there was contact but dude got both hands on the ball, nobody was holding his arms. Man up and make a play, dont bounce right up and cry to the official because you choked.
I've seen PI 10x worse than that at the end of games that wasn't called.
You are the smartest Eagle fan alive!!!!Yep. At least it won't be called in the playoffs -- every player knows that, including Curtis. Even after falling down, Curtis was in position to catch the ball. The refs rightly decided to let them play the game. I know that many of my Eagles fans brethren disagree with me, but, honestly, if the Eagles had scored a TD after a PI call in that situation it would have felt cheap.