Peter King: Arizona Owns 2024

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
27,293
Reaction score
35,907
Location
BirdGangThing
His contract would be a steal for the team receiving him. 38, 32, 42, 36, and then 46 in his age 31 year where they could cut him.
Isn't it only a steal if he's playing up to, or exceeding, expectations? If he does that, then there's no reason to trade him, right?
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,497
Reaction score
34,503
Location
Charlotte, NC
Personally I have the Commanders down for the #1 pick.

Feels like they are tanking with Howell/Brissett at QB. They don't have a bad roster but those guys aren't getting you many wins. Plus they have the Eagles, Giants and Cowboys in division.
I think the Commanders win between 5-8 games, partially because I believe in the NFC East. I think the Giants come back to earth, the Cowboys have their typical down year after a winning one, and the Eagles just don't have the talent they had last year.
Rams are going to suck too. The question is whether they suck worse than us. But also feels like they are tanking for QB.
The Rams will surprise...when they should suck. Aaron Donald guarantees five wins on his own. And McVay is a coach that will get you a few wins on his own.
1. Bucs
2. Texans
3. Packers
4. Cardinals
5. Raiders
6. Commanders
7. Patriots
8. Colts
9. Titans
10. Rams
The Bucs are going to really suck. Subpar passing game. Subpar running game. Defense is bottom halfish at this point.

I don't believe in Stroud. And Anderson isn't going to be the defensive savior some are prognosticating. He's the next Justin Houston. He'll bee pretty good for a long time with a few really good seasons.

Jordan Love is going to suck. He's going to be a bottom three starter. Take that to the bank. But in typical Packers fashion, they will be in range to get a franchise QB right when the other one is gone.
Cards at 6 comes with a huge asterix because it depends when Kyler returns and how he is when he returns.
Cardinals at four. The team will win very few games with Murray out and will show some glimpses of improvement once he gets back. I think this experience will change Murray for the better.
There is a timeline where the Cards aren't awful. A good Kyler with Hopkins, Brown, Rondale, Ertz, Wilson, McBride and Dortch is a potent offense. But even then there's question marks over the coaching and scheme. Team could be anything from 3-14 to 7-10. Too many unknown factors.
I agree overall that this group isn't bad at all.
 

gmabel830

It's football season!!
Joined
May 8, 2011
Posts
13,027
Reaction score
8,122
Location
Gilbert, Arizona
He would when you trade him and all the signing bonus goes against the Cardinals cap. He'd be very affordable.
I posted the numbers in another thread - it's like $32-42M a year in real cash paid out . That's not unaffordable with today's QB numbers, but is another QB needy team going to pay Kyler that after we give up on him vs taking a chance on a 1st round QB making a fraction of that?
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,497
Reaction score
34,503
Location
Charlotte, NC
I posted the numbers in another thread - it's like $32-42M a year in real cash paid out . That's not unaffordable with today's QB numbers, but is another QB needy team going to pay Kyler that after we give up on him vs taking a chance on a 1st round QB making a fraction of that?
Murray does have proven production. Teams that are almost playoff teams that think QB is the last spot they need would jump all over Murray.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,631
Reaction score
30,390
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Might I ask who those teams would be?
Minnesota and Dallas would be compelling landing spots for Kyler Murray in 2024-25 if someone wants him. Also potentially Tennessee and Detroit. Probably Washington also.

Any team with 7-10 wins but a quarterback in the bottom half of the NFL would be deeply improved by adding Kyler Murray to their offense.
 

BirdGangThing

Cultist
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
16,495
Reaction score
22,639
Location
Arcadia
Minnesota and Dallas would be compelling landing spots for Kyler Murray in 2024-25 if someone wants him. Also potentially Tennessee and Detroit. Probably Washington also.

Any team with 7-10 wins but a quarterback in the bottom half of the NFL would be deeply improved by adding Kyler Murray to their offense.
NFC is so desperate for QBs right now it's crazy but idk - the Kyler Murray route would be pretty expensive both financially and draft wise
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,497
Reaction score
34,503
Location
Charlotte, NC
Minnesota and Dallas would be compelling landing spots for Kyler Murray in 2024-25 if someone wants him. Also potentially Tennessee and Detroit. Probably Washington also.

Any team with 7-10 wins but a quarterback in the bottom half of the NFL would be deeply improved by adding Kyler Murray to their offense.
I think anyone who discounts the fact that other teams probably blame the Cardinals for most of Murray's struggles are fooling themselves.

If the Cardinals  could trade Murray right now, I bet they'd get a substantial trade package for him. Probably at least 2 1st round picks, 2 2nd round picks would just be the start of negotiations.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,631
Reaction score
30,390
Location
Gilbert, AZ
NFC is so desperate for QBs right now it's crazy but idk - the Kyler Murray route would be pretty expensive both financially and draft wise
I understand that -- teams that are jumping into a rebuild aren't going to want Kyler Murray. But in 2024 Kyler's cap number for a traded team should be $37 million. In 2025 it's $29.9 million.

Those are big numbers in a vacuum. But the 2025 number is lower than Daniel Jones.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
40,107
Reaction score
24,568
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
I think anyone who discounts the fact that other teams probably blame the Cardinals for most of Murray's struggles are fooling themselves.

If the Cardinals  could trade Murray right now, I bet they'd get a substantial trade package for him. Probably at least 2 1st round picks, 2 2nd round picks would just be the start of negotiations.
Absolutely right.
 

BirdGangThing

Cultist
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Posts
16,495
Reaction score
22,639
Location
Arcadia
I understand that -- teams that are jumping into a rebuild aren't going to want Kyler Murray. But in 2024 Kyler's cap number for a traded team should be $37 million. In 2025 it's $29.9 million.

Those are big numbers in a vacuum. But the 2025 number is lower than Daniel Jones.
Plus a couple first rounders with extra fixins
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,631
Reaction score
30,390
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I think anyone who discounts the fact that other teams probably blame the Cardinals for most of Murray's struggles are fooling themselves.

If the Cardinals  could trade Murray right now, I bet they'd get a substantial trade package for him. Probably at least 2 1st round picks, 2 2nd round picks would just be the start of negotiations.
I think the population of teams that would be interested in Kyler Murray is smaller than you think, but I agree that a lot of teams who are already interested in him aren't discouraged because the organization has been a mess.

That said, teams that were concerned about his size or whatever probably haven't erased where they crossed his name out.

I think you're way off base on trade comp, if only because a Trey Lance-type deal is (maybe) only available when it's attached to a rookie contract that allows you to build a veteran team to support the prospect. Kyler on a pretty fairly expensive veteran deal might not reap those kind of rewards.

Of course, all you need is a bad organization to fall in love with him, but he doesn't have the resume of DangeRuss.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,816
Reaction score
41,665
Location
UK
I think the Commanders win between 5-8 games, partially because I believe in the NFC East. I think the Giants come back to earth, the Cowboys have their typical down year after a winning one, and the Eagles just don't have the talent they had last year.

The Rams will surprise...when they should suck. Aaron Donald guarantees five wins on his own. And McVay is a coach that will get you a few wins on his own.

The Bucs are going to really suck. Subpar passing game. Subpar running game. Defense is bottom halfish at this point.

I don't believe in Stroud. And Anderson isn't going to be the defensive savior some are prognosticating. He's the next Justin Houston. He'll bee pretty good for a long time with a few really good seasons.

Jordan Love is going to suck. He's going to be a bottom three starter. Take that to the bank. But in typical Packers fashion, they will be in range to get a franchise QB right when the other one is gone.

Cardinals at four. The team will win very few games with Murray out and will show some glimpses of improvement once he gets back. I think this experience will change Murray for the better.

I agree overall that this group isn't bad at all.

I missed the Bears. The Bears are likely a top 10 team again, really depends on how the Packers are.
 

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,816
Reaction score
41,665
Location
UK
Do people really think Kyler would get much in a trade?

If I'm a GM I'm thinking "He has a losing record, he's been through a HC that tried to recruit him in college and drafted him #1 and couldn't make that work. He's had a 2nd head coach that was all about making him great and that didn't work. There's all these negative stories about him and the Cardinals, the CARDINALS, want to move on from him. How good can he be?"

I think it's dreamland. I'd be super wary of trading anything more than a bag of cheetos. Russ got the Seahawks a pot of gold because he was proven. He won a Superbowl and went to another. He had an insanely positive winning record.

Why would anyone look at Kyler and think "I need some of this guy with 6 years in the league that still has a losing record"?
 

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,507
Reaction score
5,785
Location
Scarsdale, NY
Do people really think Kyler would get much in a trade?

If I'm a GM I'm thinking "He has a losing record, he's been through a HC that tried to recruit him in college and drafted him #1 and couldn't make that work. He's had a 2nd head coach that was all about making him great and that didn't work. There's all these negative stories about him and the Cardinals, the CARDINALS, want to move on from him. How good can he be?"

I think it's dreamland. I'd be super wary of trading anything more than a bag of cheetos. Russ got the Seahawks a pot of gold because he was proven. He won a Superbowl and went to another. He had an insanely positive winning record.

Why would anyone look at Kyler and think "I need some of this guy with 6 years in the league that still has a losing record"?
I might be wrong, but I thought he won Offensive Rookie of the Year. I do remember that when he was drafted we had the League's worst record.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,497
Reaction score
34,503
Location
Charlotte, NC
I think the population of teams that would be interested in Kyler Murray is smaller than you think, but I agree that a lot of teams who are already interested in him aren't discouraged because the organization has been a mess.

That said, teams that were concerned about his size or whatever probably haven't erased where they crossed his name out.

I think you're way off base on trade comp, if only because a Trey Lance-type deal is (maybe) only available when it's attached to a rookie contract that allows you to build a veteran team to support the prospect. Kyler on a pretty fairly expensive veteran deal might not reap those kind of rewards.

Of course, all you need is a bad organization to fall in love with him, but he doesn't have the resume of DangeRuss.
Teams will look at how young Murray still is and think he's still barely scratching the surface of what he can do. I absolutely think he'd get a big package, maybe not Russ Wilson level, but close.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,497
Reaction score
34,503
Location
Charlotte, NC
Do people really think Kyler would get much in a trade?

If I'm a GM I'm thinking "He has a losing record, he's been through a HC that tried to recruit him in college and drafted him #1 and couldn't make that work. He's had a 2nd head coach that was all about making him great and that didn't work. There's all these negative stories about him and the Cardinals, the CARDINALS, want to move on from him. How good can he be?"
Bro, the Cardinals have had many of our castoffs go elsewhere and succeed. There is a long track record going back to the St. Louis Cardinals.
I think it's dreamland. I'd be super wary of trading anything more than a bag of cheetos. Russ got the Seahawks a pot of gold because he was proven. He won a Superbowl and went to another. He had an insanely positive winning record.
Right and he played with a team with a great, winning culture. He won a Super Bowl where they probably would have won even if he didn't complete a pass in that game.
Why would anyone look at Kyler and think "I need some of this guy with 6 years in the league that still has a losing record"?
Because the Cardinals.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,497
Reaction score
34,503
Location
Charlotte, NC
It's funny because I always say the real NFL is nothing like Madden when it comes to GMing and yet Monti basically pulled off Madden type future deals. It's the kind of crap I do in franchise mode.
Heh, I always sign free agents and then trade them for picks. :p
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,846
Reaction score
41,977
Location
Colorado
Isn't it only a steal if he's playing up to, or exceeding, expectations? If he does that, then there's no reason to trade him, right?
Kind of. IF Caleb Williams is a top QB prospect, you don't pass on acquiring him to keep Derek Carr or Dak Prescott. If Kyler plays OK but not spectacular, a team like the Commanders could see the advantages of having Kyler on a 38 mil deal. Atlanta may be done with the Desmond Ridder experiment. Looking like a top 16 QB vs a top 5 QB is a big difference but both are better than having a bottom 10 QB.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,846
Reaction score
41,977
Location
Colorado
I think the population of teams that would be interested in Kyler Murray is smaller than you think, but I agree that a lot of teams who are already interested in him aren't discouraged because the organization has been a mess.

That said, teams that were concerned about his size or whatever probably haven't erased where they crossed his name out.

I think you're way off base on trade comp, if only because a Trey Lance-type deal is (maybe) only available when it's attached to a rookie contract that allows you to build a veteran team to support the prospect. Kyler on a pretty fairly expensive veteran deal might not reap those kind of rewards.

Of course, all you need is a bad organization to fall in love with him, but he doesn't have the resume of DangeRuss.
Agree. A 2nd and 4th are far more likely of a return and would still be great. I believe it would look similar to our trading of the 3rd pick in this draft. Maybe you get a great offer because of a lot of interest, but regardless you should be able to get something.
 
Top