alot of people want John Skelton instead of a guy like Whitehurst. What are you basing that on?
Let's do a breakdown of what we know about Skelton or any other draft prospect vs Whitehurst.
Both had good college careers.
Both have never made a pass in the NFL
Whitehurst would either be getting a vet contract and cost us a 3rd round pick or we would trade for him and he'd have one year left
Rookie we would have on a cheap contract for 4 year giving him time to develop.
Whitehurst has sat behind two good QBs. While that sounds great, it doesn't prove anything. Leinart has been sitting behind a hall of famer for a few years now too and has more experience.
Rookie would need to be coached.
Whitehurst has had the QB guru Norv Turner as coach. While that sounds great how many of Turners 3rd stringers have turned into good starters. I don't think he is a guru because every QB he touches turns into a pro bowler, just that he has a knack for finding starters.
So here's what we have:
Unknown: what any rookie or Whitehurst will give us on the field.
Known: rookie would be younger and have a better contract situation than Whitehurst
Whitehurst has been exposed to the NFL and coaching and is likely more ready to go this season.
So it comes down to do you think we need Whitehurst this season to win games? Is he clearly better than Matt? If not you go with a rookie.