I read Rugby's post say saying that he's "cheering" for Humphries to start. So am I; the Cards are better when their first-round picks work out. There are going to be no shortage of experienced options out there come March and into April.
Well, of course, if Humphries turns out to be an adequate starter, yeah, great. I'm "cheering" for that outcome too. I am NOT--and I can't believe anyone would be--cheering for him to start at this point. It would be the height of stupidity for our front office to put all of our eggs in that basket at RT. He's not just unproven--HE'S NEVER GOTTEN A HELMET ON GAME DAY.
You have to ride or die with DJ. No two ways about it.
I'm not a fan of his, but the sample size of DJ's ability is virtually non-existent, so much so that it's impossible to pass ultimate judgement and label him a "bust."
My only concern is who's going to snap the ball.
You absolutely do NOT have to ride or die with him. I mean, what kind of logic is that?
That's the problem--his sample size is indeed nonexistant, so there's absolutely NO way you can just say, 'hey, the job's 100 percent yours'. That's just horrific logic--or none at all.
You are right that you can't label him a bust yet. You certainly cannot pin all our hopes at RT on him, but you can't call him a bust yet. If he doesn't play well or, worse, doesn't play/is never active, he will 100 percent be a bust--barring injury.
I just can't believe people want to hand him the job on a platter. That is patently insane, IMO.