Pitchers traded In Last Year

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,376
Reaction score
32,057
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Hmm....

Bauer: 4.52 ERA part time pitcher

Skaggs: career best 4.30 ERA (never below 5.00 prior two seasons). Tommy Johns, out until 2016

Parker: Decent ERA 3.60 2 Tommy Johns surgery. Out until 2015 but may never play again.


I might have said more than once that top prospect doesn't equal top performance...
 
OP
OP
Chris_Sanders

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,376
Reaction score
32,057
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Forgot about Kennedy. He is the best of the bunch with a 3.51 ERA right now.
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,288
Reaction score
8,313
Location
Scottsdale
Hmm....

Bauer: 4.52 ERA part time pitcher

Skaggs: career best 4.30 ERA (never below 5.00 prior two seasons). Tommy Johns, out until 2016

Parker: Decent ERA 3.60 2 Tommy Johns surgery. Out until 2015 but may never play again.


I might have said more than once that top prospect doesn't equal top performance...

In his last start, Bauer got his clock cleaned by the marginal at best Yankees...
 

BC867

Long time Phoenician!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
17,827
Reaction score
1,709
Location
NE Phoenix
Hmm....

Bauer: 4.52 ERA part time pitcher

Skaggs: career best 4.30 ERA (never below 5.00 prior two seasons). Tommy Johns, out until 2016

Parker: Decent ERA 3.60 2 Tommy Johns surgery. Out until 2015 but may never play again.


I might have said more than once that top prospect doesn't equal top performance...
Shhh! Someone might get the idea that Kevin Towers is Executive of the Year.
 

Shaggy

Site Owner Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Posts
9,048
Reaction score
2,989
Location
Arizona
What were they traded for?
 
OP
OP
Chris_Sanders

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,376
Reaction score
32,057
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Shhh! Someone might get the idea that Kevin Towers is Executive of the Year.

Well that would mean he got back decent things.

His haul for Kennedy has some potential but the rest is trading crap for crap.
 
OP
OP
Chris_Sanders

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,376
Reaction score
32,057
Location
Scottsdale, Az
What were they traded for?

Bauer for Didi Gregorious

I like Didi but a top prospect like Bauer (no matter how flawed) should have gotten more. Unfortunately we went out of our way to tell everyone how much he sucks before we traded him.


Parker / Cook for Cahill and Breslow: Parker wasn't very good until this year, Cahill wasn't very bad until this year. We definitely got the shaft when you toss in Cook though, who has been fantastic for the A's.

Skaggs /Eaton (won't add the other part of this for DWKB) for Trumbo. I doubt either team is happy with how this has turned out. AZ has an overpriced Mark Reynolds and Skaggs is out for at least a year.

Kennedy for Stites, Thatcher, and a pick that became Marcus Wilson - Wilson is the #8 prospect for the DBacks now. Stites has good stuff but a bad ERA. Thatcher has been spun into Borenstein and Khrebiel. Borenstein is DBacks current #20 prospect.

Basically I like the Kennedy trade. It is the sort of trades a rebuilding team should be making.
 
Last edited:

Matt L

formerly known as mattyboy
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
4,380
Reaction score
589
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
I would still take all three of them and their contracts over Cahill, Arroyo, Nuno and McCarthy
 

Big Deal

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Posts
1,633
Reaction score
81
Bauer for Didi Gregorious

I like Didi but a top prospect like Bauer (no matter how flawed) should have gotten more. Unfortunately we went out of our way to tell everyone how much he sucks before we traded him.


Parker / Cook for Cahill and Breslow: Parker wasn't very good until this year, Cahill wasn't very bad until this year. We definitely got the shaft when you toss in Cook though, who has been fantastic for the A's.

Skaggs /Eaton (won't add the other part of this for DWKB) for Trumbo. I doubt either team is happy with how this has turned out. AZ has an overpriced Mark Reynolds and Skaggs is out for at least a year.

Kennedy for Stites, Thatcher, and a pick that became Marcus Wilson - Wilson is the #8 prospect for the DBacks now. Stites has good stuff but a bad ERA. Thatcher has been spun into Borenstein and Khrebiel. Borenstein is DBacks current #20 prospect.

Basically I like the Kennedy trade. It is the sort of trades a rebuilding team should be making.


You wont add it because you are flat out wrong. The Skaggs Eaton had nothing to do with Reed. Get over it.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...-acquire-addison-reed-from-white-sox/4042141/
 
OP
OP
Chris_Sanders

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,376
Reaction score
32,057
Location
Scottsdale, Az
OP
OP
Chris_Sanders

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,376
Reaction score
32,057
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Did you have anything to add beyond that in regards to the pitchers traded?
 

Big Deal

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Posts
1,633
Reaction score
81
Did you have anything to add beyond that in regards to the pitchers traded?

I don't have anything to add, but thanks for asking. My clarification is indeed just and needed. People come to these boards to get/give information on their teams. I for one cannot stand misinformation of any kind and if I can help point out to one of our readers the actual facts of a trade then I will certainly do so.

Maybe some people like it when a co-worker spouts out some untrue sports "fact" and then points to some incorrect message board as backup, but I'd rather the facts are clearly out there.

The trades have NOTHING to do with each other. They don't even have the same teams involved in the trade. That would be like saying the Diamondbacks agreed to a three team/two team trade over several days.

Sorry I will not let this go, but I want to come to this board to read facts.
 
OP
OP
Chris_Sanders

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,376
Reaction score
32,057
Location
Scottsdale, Az
I don't have anything to add, but thanks for asking. My clarification is indeed just and needed. People come to these boards to get/give information on their teams. I for one cannot stand misinformation of any kind and if I can help point out to one of our readers the actual facts of a trade then I will certainly do so.

Maybe some people like it when a co-worker spouts out some untrue sports "fact" and then points to some incorrect message board as backup, but I'd rather the facts are clearly out there.

The trades have NOTHING to do with each other. They don't even have the same teams involved in the trade. That would be like saying the Diamondbacks agreed to a three team/two team trade over several days.

Sorry I will not let this go, but I want to come to this board to read facts.

....I said he was right in that it is an individual transaction but since you clearly want to grasp on something

If you have two transactions that happen within 1 week of each other, from a management standpoint are you more likely to be:

A) looking at each transaction individually
B) looking at the two transactions with the idea of a final product.

It is entirely possible that the negotiations for two trades that happened within 1 week of each other were negotiated entirely independently but it doesn't add up to me. So I choose "A"

Now is the real reason for this stand:

A) You are guarding our forum members from disinformation about which of the two trades to the White Sox Eaton was on.

or

B) You are looking for a reason to argue with me?


If it is B, I really have no desire to argue with you. If it is "A" well...thanks for looking out for our members.
 
Last edited:

Dback Jon

Doing it My Way
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
82,842
Reaction score
42,835
Location
South Scottsdale
Skaggs trade, 8 month review:

Dbacks gave up:
Tyler Skaggs - mediocre In 2014, Collmenter, Nuno and especially Chase Anderson have all pitched better in 2014 than Skaggs. Injured, out until at least 2016, may never pitch again.
Adam Eaton - 1 HR, 32 RBI's, OPS .771 on DL for second time this season.

Dbacks got:
Mark Trumbo - 8 HR, 32 RBI's, OPS .672, was on DL.
Brandon Jacobs - 15 HR, 34 RBI's in High A
AJ Schugel - pitching decent in AA

While Trumbo isn't much, the Dbacks didn't give up anything to get him.

And, it gave players like Chase Anderson and David Peralta a chance to shine.

So far, both those players have performed better than Skaggs and Eaton.
 

unseenaz

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Posts
6,950
Reaction score
5,857
Location
Gilbert
....I said he was right in that it is an individual transaction but since you clearly want to grasp on something

If you have two transactions that happen within 1 week of each other, from a management standpoint are you more likely to be:

A) looking at each transaction individually
B) looking at the two transactions with the idea of a final product.

It is entirely possible that the negotiations for two trades that happened within 1 week of each other were negotiated entirely independently but it doesn't add up to me. So I choose "A"

Now is the real reason for this stand:

A) You are guarding our forum members from disinformation about which of the two trades to the White Sox Eaton was on.

or

B) You are looking for a reason to argue with me?


If it is B, I really have no desire to argue with you. If it is "A" well...thanks for looking out for our members.


I feel like you are just trying to pick fights in here? Not sure why, never seen this behavior from you. Think this discussion with a level mind if you aren't already.

The points you're making are pure speculation, here are the facts;

Eaton went to the Whitesox in a 3 team deal that netted us Trumbo.

6 days later we traded Davidson for Reed straight up, this wasn't a case of PTBNL or anything of that nature.
 

unseenaz

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Posts
6,950
Reaction score
5,857
Location
Gilbert
Skaggs trade, 8 month review:

Dbacks gave up:
Tyler Skaggs - mediocre In 2014, Collmenter, Nuno and especially Chase Anderson have all pitched better in 2014 than Skaggs. Injured, out until at least 2016, may never pitch again.
Adam Eaton - 1 HR, 32 RBI's, OPS .771 on DL for second time this season.

Dbacks got:
Mark Trumbo - 8 HR, 32 RBI's, OPS .672, was on DL.
Brandon Jacobs - 15 HR, 34 RBI's in High A
AJ Schugel - pitching decent in AA

While Trumbo isn't much, the Dbacks didn't give up anything to get him.

And, it gave players like Chase Anderson and David Peralta a chance to shine.

So far, both those players have performed better than Skaggs and Eaton.

When Skaggs was first traded Gambo said that one of his sources said the DBacks "knew something about Skaggs" and he said it was unfavorable information. Gambo has sources all over professional sports and they always seem to be spot on, so this news now makes sense
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,288
Reaction score
8,313
Location
Scottsdale
Skaggs trade, 8 month review:

Dbacks gave up:
Tyler Skaggs - mediocre In 2014, Collmenter, Nuno and especially Chase Anderson have all pitched better in 2014 than Skaggs. Injured, out until at least 2016, may never pitch again.
Adam Eaton - 1 HR, 32 RBI's, OPS .771 on DL for second time this season.

Dbacks got:
Mark Trumbo - 8 HR, 32 RBI's, OPS .672, was on DL.
Brandon Jacobs - 15 HR, 34 RBI's in High A
AJ Schugel - pitching decent in AA

While Trumbo isn't much, the Dbacks didn't give up anything to get him.

And, it gave players like Chase Anderson and David Peralta a chance to shine.

So far, both those players have performed better than Skaggs and Eaton.

Yep...

:thumbup:
 

Dback Jon

Doing it My Way
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
82,842
Reaction score
42,835
Location
South Scottsdale
Question - Say Player A is traded to Team A for Player B. Then the team turns around and trades Player C (who plays same position as Player B) to Team C - wouldn't you consider the trades somewhat linked? In other words, once Player B is acquired, Player C becomes expendable and available to trade.
 
Top