Playoff predictions

Dude

ASFN Addict
Joined
Jun 17, 2015
Posts
5,976
Reaction score
1,190
Location
OR.
not trying to be serious? in what way?

you think the rest of the Country thinks the Cards will win too or something?
most people arent paying a lick of attention to the Cards.
And I still dont get how you cant realize losing Honey Badger affects the Cards greatly,especially vs Rodgers.
He was the Troy P. of this team and he isnt playing now.

no, every Steelers fan who's a childish pain would laugh at you saying they had a better chance then the Steelers because thats what childish fans do. Especially since the Steelers beat the Cards in the Big game in the first place.

You're here to be a jerk.

That's all have fun.
 

AZfaninMN

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 7, 2014
Posts
8,082
Reaction score
6,492
Location
Minnesota
not trying to be serious? in what way?

you think the rest of the Country thinks the Cards will win too or something?
most people arent paying a lick of attention to the Cards.
And I still dont get how you cant realize losing Honey Badger affects the Cards greatly,especially vs Rodgers.
He was the Troy P. of this team and he isnt playing now.

no, every Steelers fan who's a childish pain would laugh at you saying they had a better chance then the Steelers because thats what childish fans do. Especially since the Steelers beat the Cards in the Big game in the first place.


We trounced the packers without HB last time so I think we will be ok. They have no weapons to threaten us on offense. That's why they only scored 8 points against us last time. Do u even watch football or do you throw out blind guesses? If so have u watched a cardinals game?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

babedimancheff

Veteran
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Posts
192
Reaction score
0
We trounced the packers without HB last time so I think we will be ok. They have no weapons to threaten us on offense. That's why they only scored 8 points against us last time. Do u even watch football or do you throw out blind guesses? If so have u watched a cardinals game?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
werent the Packers missing cornerbacks too,last time?



the Hawks trounced the Vikes last time..did that happen today? no

how about that last Falcons game against Panthers? Panthers didnt win again. Playing a team twice whether division or not isnt a good thing a lot of times.

you are asking me if Ive ever watched football and yet you seem to forget recent and long term history. The Cardinals had a shoot out with Seahawks and then lost to them badly.
this is the playoffs...those are the Packers.
He is Aaron Rodgers. You assume too much.
 

AZfaninMN

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 7, 2014
Posts
8,082
Reaction score
6,492
Location
Minnesota
werent the Packers missing cornerbacks too,last time?



the Hawks trounced the Vikes last time..did that happen today? no

how about that last Falcons game against Panthers? Panthers didnt win again. Playing a team twice whether division or not isnt a good thing a lot of times.

you are asking me if Ive ever watched football and yet you seem to forget recent and long term history. The Cardinals had a shoot out with Seahawks and then lost to them badly.
this is the playoffs...those are the Packers.
He is Aaron Rodgers. You assume too much.


AR is not the same player he has been the past 5 years. He has no offensive line and no wrs. Their lack of cbs in the last game doesn't change the fact that they scored 8 points. I think it will be a closer game than last time but just to say before injury reports or anything you pick against the cardinals. I bet you would think the '08 lions would beat both the seahawks and the cardinals this year.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,179
Reaction score
31,714
Location
Scottsdale, Az
not trying to be serious? in what way?

you think the rest of the Country thinks the Cards will win too or something?
most people arent paying a lick of attention to the Cards.
And I still dont get how you cant realize losing Honey Badger affects the Cards greatly,especially vs Rodgers.
He was the Troy P. of this team and he isnt playing now.

no, every Steelers fan who's a childish pain would laugh at you saying they had a better chance then the Steelers because thats what childish fans do. Especially since the Steelers beat the Cards in the Big game in the first place.

Someone is salty
 

AZfaninMN

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 7, 2014
Posts
8,082
Reaction score
6,492
Location
Minnesota
Passing

Hide non-qualifiers for rate stats · Glossary · SHARE · Embed · CSV · Export · PRE · LINK · ?
Rk
Tm Age Pos G GS QBrec Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD TD% Int Int% Lng Y/A AY/A Y/C Y/G Rate QBR Sk Yds NY/A ANY/A Sk% 4QC GWD 1 Philip Rivers SDG 34 QB 16 16 4-12-0 437 661 66.1 4792 29 4.4 13 2.0 80 7.2 7.2 11.0 299.5 93.8 59.44 40 264 6.46 6.45 5.7 1 2 2 Drew Brees NOR 36 QB 15 15 7-8-0 428 627 68.3 4870 32 5.1 11 1.8 80 7.8 8.0 11.4 324.7 101.0 75.47 31 235 7.04 7.26 4.7 1 2 3 Tom Brady NWE 38 QB 16 16 12-4-0 402 624 64.4 4770 36 5.8 7 1.1 76 7.6 8.3 11.9 298.1 102.2 64.42 38 225 6.87 7.48 5.7 2 2 4 Eli Manning NYG 34 QB 16 16 6-10-0 387 618 62.6 4436 35 5.7 14 2.3 87 7.2 7.3 11.5 277.3 93.6 60.46 27 157 6.63 6.74 4.2 1 2 5 Matt Ryan ATL 30 QB 16 16 8-8-0 407 614 66.3 4591 21 3.4 16 2.6 70 7.5 7.0 11.3 286.9 89.0 61.79 30 203 6.81 6.35 4.7 4 4 6 Blake Bortles JAX 23 QB 16 16 5-11-0 355 606 58.6 4428 35 5.8 18 3.0 90 7.3 7.1 12.5 276.8 88.2 46.4 51 320 6.25 6.09 7.8 3 4 7 Matthew Stafford DET 27 QB 16 16 7-9-0 398 592 67.2 4262 32 5.4 13 2.2 57 7.2 7.3 10.7 266.4 97.0 62.63 44 251 6.31 6.39 6.9 2 3 8 Ryan Tannehill MIA 27 QB 16 16 6-10-0 363 586 61.9 4208 24 4.1 12 2.0 54 7.2 7.1 11.6 263.0 88.7 43.15 45 420 6.00 5.91 7.1 2 2 9 Derek Carr OAK 24 QB 16 16 7-9-0 350 573 61.1 3987 32 5.6 13 2.3 68 7.0 7.1 11.4 249.2 91.1 49.23 31 230 6.22 6.31 5.1 4 4 10 Aaron Rodgers GNB 32 QB 16 16 10-6-0 347 572 60.7 3821 31 5.4 8 1.4 65 6.7 7.1 11.0 238.8 92.7 64.92 46 314 5.67 6.10 7.4 2 2 11 Ryan Fitzpatrick NYJ 33 QB 16 16 10-6-0 335 562 59.6 3905 31 5.5 15 2.7 69 6.9 6.9 11.7 244.1 88.0 63.63 19 94 6.56 6.46 3.3 2 3 12 Kirk Cousins WAS 27 QB 16 16 9-7-0 379 543 69.8 4166 29 5.3 11 2.0 78 7.7 7.8 11.0 260.4 101.6 70.05 26 186 6.99 7.14 4.6 2 3 13 Carson Palmer ARI 36 QB 16 16 13-3-0 342 537 63.7 4671 35 6.5 11 2.0 68 8.7 9.1 13.7 291.9 104.6 82.15 25 151 8.04 8.41 4.4 1 4 14 Jameis Winston TAM 21 QB 16


??????? I can copy and paste stats too but that doesn't mean anything


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

babedimancheff

Veteran
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Posts
192
Reaction score
0
??????? I can copy and paste stats too but that doesn't mean anything


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

too much,didnt do it right.
Stats are everything in sports.

Rodgers is doing fine and statistically still better than Carson over all was my point
 

AZfaninMN

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 7, 2014
Posts
8,082
Reaction score
6,492
Location
Minnesota
too much,didnt do it right.
Stats are everything in sports.

Rodgers is doing fine and statistically still better than Carson over all was my point


Carson Palmer threw for 800 more yards and 4 more tds. I wouldn't call that better.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,179
Reaction score
31,714
Location
Scottsdale, Az
too much,didnt do it right.
Stats are everything in sports.

Rodgers is doing fine and statistically still better than Carson over all was my point

So then you feel that player A is the better player?

Player A:

QB Rating: 104.6 4671 passing yards 35 TDs 11 INTs 63.7% completion

Player B

QB Rating 92.1 3821 Passing Yards 31 TDs 8 INTs 60.7% completion
 

AZfaninMN

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 7, 2014
Posts
8,082
Reaction score
6,492
Location
Minnesota
too much,didnt do it right.
Stats are everything in sports.

Rodgers is doing fine and statistically still better than Carson over all was my point


Plus Palmer's completion % is 4% better and averaged 2 yards more per pass attempt.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,151
Reaction score
8,074
Location
Scottsdale
Chiefs 37 Texans 16 W

Packers 43 Redskins 21 W

Vikings 31 Seahawks 17 L

Steelers 38 Bengals 17 W
-----------------------
Chiefs 27 Patriots 23
Steelers 26 Broncos 23

Packers
35 Cardinals 31
Panthers 21 Seahawks 24
------------------------
Steelers 37 Patriots 31

Seahawks21 Packers 28
----------------------
Steelers 38 Packers 35

The Vikes going to the Super Bowl?? LOL...

I can easily see a repeat of the '09 Super Bowl, Cards & Steelers... Only the refs don't take the victory away from the Cards this time! ;)

I think the Seattle will take care of business in MN, no matter the temps. And I see a Cards & Hawks NFC Championship game... In the AFC, I see a Steelers & Pats AFC Championship game...

;)
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,476
Reaction score
18,384
Location
The Giant Toaster
Palmer definitely had the better year but there's a good chance he'd be dead in the Packers offense.
 

babedimancheff

Veteran
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Posts
192
Reaction score
0
He was probably dumb enough to believe that him going back & editing his picks wouldn't show up after Vikes got knocked out lol. :D

wrong.
I'm not hiding anything. Since Vikings obviously lost I am simply seeing If I can still pick what really happens. You of course see where I labeled that I did lose a pick,dont you?
 

Azlen

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Apr 29, 2004
Posts
3,724
Reaction score
943
wrong.
I'm not hiding anything. Since Vikings obviously lost I am simply seeing If I can still pick what really happens. You of course see where I labeled that I did lose a pick,dont you?

Then make a new post. Don't go back and edit your old one.
 

Dude

ASFN Addict
Joined
Jun 17, 2015
Posts
5,976
Reaction score
1,190
Location
OR.
The troll wasn't that smart

Come on man he picked 3 out of 4. It's not like this week was easy. All four winners were favored. He's probably getting his ******** the AP celebration.

:deadhorse2:
 
Last edited:

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,475
Reaction score
68,718
I said this months ago and I'm sticking to it:

Cards v. Hawks for all the NFC Marbles.

I have no clue what happens in the dog-house, war of attrition that is the AFC.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,477
Reaction score
16,651
Location
San Antonio, Texas
wrong.
I'm not hiding anything. Since Vikings obviously lost I am simply seeing If I can still pick what really happens. You of course see where I labeled that I did lose a pick,dont you?

Choosing to pick on a Cardinal fan forum... don't they have sites for the 'neutral observer' and you are not a troll but a little imp, Bucky gives you too much credit and I am now mad at him lol
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,281
Reaction score
6,230
Location
Dallas, TX
Choosing to pick on a Cardinal fan forum... don't they have sites for the 'neutral observer' and you are not a troll but a little imp, Bucky gives you too much credit and I am now mad at him lol

Don't make me send Vontaze Burfict down to SA for a beat down on you Texan :p
 

NJCardFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
14,974
Reaction score
2,968
Location
Bridgeton, NJ
not trying to be serious? in what way?

you think the rest of the Country thinks the Cards will win too or something?
most people arent paying a lick of attention to the Cards.

And I still dont get how you cant realize losing Honey Badger affects the Cards greatly,especially vs Rodgers.
He was the Troy P. of this team and he isnt playing now.

no, every Steelers fan who's a childish pain would laugh at you saying they had a better chance then the Steelers because thats what childish fans do. Especially since the Steelers beat the Cards in the Big game in the first place.
But it's only CBS Sports. What do they know: http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25442860/super-bowl-odds-patriots-cardinals-begin-playoffs-as-co-favorites

And 5 of 11 people from SI picks the Cards. But they're just Sports Illustrated. What do they know. http://www.si.com/nfl/2016/01/08/2016-nfl-playoff-predictions-super-bowl-50

Obvious troll is obvious.
 

MrYeahBut

4 Food groups: beans, chili, cheese, bacon
Supporting Member
Joined
May 20, 2002
Posts
17,866
Reaction score
13,510
Location
Albq
btw, Babes namesake is Boris Stephan 'Babe' Dimancheff who played on the 1947 Chicago Cardinals championship team.
 
Top