slinslin said:I bet he is going to pay her a nice sum of money and it's over.
The victim is asking for $70k min....slinslin said:Well it says with the option to refile charges later. I bet he is going to pay her a nice sum of money and it's over.
Well if I was "victim" I'd rather take a million or whatever as well rather than going to a trial that you might not win anyway.
WizardOfAz said:She filed a civil suit on August 10th seeking $75,000.
My appologies Slin...looks like Kobe is opening his purse....slinslin said:....Well if I was "victim" I'd rather take a million or whatever as well rather than going to a trial that you might not win anyway.
Here's my take on how things probably went down in Colorado:
--the initial hookup was consensual; she knew she was sleeping with a married man, and did it because she thought it would be fun and make a great story to tell her friends
--Kobe decided to switch from the agreed-upon act (#1) to a #3 or #4 without prior notice; he'd probably gotten bored with risking his marriage and his reputation with the usual semi-anonymous adulteries, and he was looking to spice things up a little
--the girl was not interested at all in going along, so there was a brief struggle and an unhappy ending
--she went home and showed Mom the damage; Mom sent her to the police
--the 'other man' was someone she'd had sex with before the Kobe incident; she probably didn't own a single pair of underwear that didn't have traces of somebody's spunk on it
--she bailed out on the criminal trial weeks (months?) ago, when her team figured out that the prosecutors and judge were incompetent, and she was subjecting herself to constant harassment and invasion of privacy without any chance of getting a conviction against Kobe
--Kobe is paying a lot of money (I would be surprised if it's less than seven figures, and not surprised at all if it was eight figures) to hush things up here--not because he's worried about getting convicted, but because her lawyers are threatening to air his dirty underwear in public, which would damage his reputation in a way that would be tough to recover from (pictures of the damage, graphic descriptions of the sex act, exposing his prior hookups, leaking his initial interview with police, where he probably sounds like a complete idiot)
As thing stand, Kobe and his reputation should be just fine in a couple of years. He'll probably have a lot of trouble asking for a #3 from now on, though.
She'll get enough cash to make her feel a little better about the experience, once the harassment dies down a little, anyway. The problem is that it may never completely die down.
That's how I see it, anyway.![]()
The following could be your answer....Renz said:Why would Kobe give her $5 mil.? Under Colorado law, the most she can get in a civil suit is something like $1.7 mil.![]()
Enough said.....Djaughe[/color said:]Kobe is prepared to offer $5 Million or more to make Kate Faber go away National Enquirer - 08/21/03
Both sides insisted the victim hadn't received a dime from Bryant, even though her civil lawsuit against him will go ahead.
But legal insiders told The Post they believe a top-secret deal was struck that could bring the accuser millions of dollars.
"Why someone as well-counseled as Bryant would make such a bizarre statement, pseudo-apology, at such an inopportune time, I can only presume this is to facilitate imminent settlement discussions," said Colorado defense attorney Scott Robinson.
slinslin said:
elindholm said:Slinslin probably doesn't know what the Enquirer is, but I can't imagine what excuse the rest of you have.
The Enquirer is famous for making up stories and presenting them as fact. They are often sued for slander by celebrities tired of the bad publicity. Almost nothing they publish is ever correct, except once in a while by accident.
KLL said:Enough said.....
elindholm said:Slinslin probably doesn't know what the Enquirer is, but I can't imagine what excuse the rest of you have.
The Enquirer is famous for making up stories and presenting them as fact. They are often sued for slander by celebrities tired of the bad publicity. Almost nothing they publish is ever correct, except once in a while by accident.
lol...like some of the stuff posted in this forum is more accurate?LakeShowMan said:I was just thinking the same thing. Where has our society gone, when we make the Enquirer a 'legitimate new source'?
If that is the case, I need to go down to Arkansas to see the half-man, half-alien baby that was just born, and then I am going to Tennesee to meet up with Elvis, who is of course alive and pumping gas at a Quik-E-Mart.
Sheesh!![]()