if it's a LT, ABSOLUTELY the tackle. I think Levi can still play RT if Massie doesn't develop. Hopefully Massie develops and we can give Levi a shot at G, where many members feel he would be a stud
LT is our #1 priority, and if BPA also happens to be a LT, We BETTER jump on him
I disagree. We need to be focused on Oline, but go BPA. Doesnt matter if its a T, C or G. Considering the talent, theres a 90% itll be a Guard. Lot of good ones this year.
Yes, we need a LT, but going after one, drafting purely on need, is how we ended up with Levi.
BPA
BPA
BPA
If it happens to be a LT, Awesome.
If its a G. Take him.
Yes, our T positions are epic bad. But dont forget Snyder MUST be replaced. Hes the worst G in the NFL. So drafting a star G will also be a major win for us.
I would make our first two picks O-line then our next two D-line. Don't want either of the Bama linemen . Would take either of the Texas A&M tackles.
Those 2 T's from TT are overrated IMO. IF either one is the BPA, then fine. But dont go after either one.
Whats wrong with Bama linemen? IDC either way. Talent is talent, it just sounds like you have a thing against bama in general.
Why 2 picks on D line?
D line is arguably our deepest position. We need 4 Olineman (because we also need to draft some depth). A Safety. Maybe another CB. Possibly a RB since RW and BEanie cant stay healthy. Maybe a QB. ILB and OLB.
We have so many needs, why take a DT at all? Dan, Eason, Carter, CC, Dockett, Vonnie. The last thing we should do is take a D lineman.