Question that DEMAND ANSWERS!

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
I have asked these questions a millions times. With no answers to them.

1. Why doesn't Blake throw the ball down field ?

Why is Blake not throwing his 60 yard bombs? It is not like this pick them apart style is working. Let him at least throw INT's 60 yards down the field. What do we have to lose?

2. Are Gerald Hayes, and Reggie Wells banned from playing on this team?

3. How long are Clement, Davis, and various other potential stars going to be given thier chance?

4. The not playing Shipp has finally been resolved. Shipp should be the starter.

5. ARE THE CARDINALS EVER GONNA GET THERE TIME MANAGEMENT DOWN?

Peace
:thumbup:
 

DieHardCardFan

Dallas 2011
Joined
Oct 8, 2003
Posts
1,973
Reaction score
0
Location
Ahwatukee
Yeah I am a bit puzzled about them not calling plays that allow Blake to go deep. He even is mad and stated so.

Shipp did his job very well this game and averaging 4.4 yards per carry. But why did they stop giving him the ball??? Even Sullivan stated he messed up and should have given Shipp the ball more.

The time managment issue is becoming almost as bad as the turn overs. There was no reason for some of the BS that went on yesterday.


In ending this game was a game we should have won. Our Defense stepped up and held them to field goals which is exactley what I predicted in a previous post. The offense passing issues while I hate it are kinda to be expected when we have not had the same receivers in one single game. Each week it is a different group and a young group at that. Blake has to relearn these guys each week. I have not lost faith in Blake, but my faith is wearing very thin.
 

Tangodnzr

ASFN Lifer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
3,837
Reaction score
5
Location
Idaho
Well, in regard to question #1, I think injuries have something to do with it.

Once Gilmore left the game yesterday, the deep speed potential, dropped.

To me, Gilmore, McAddley, and Johnson are the "speed", "deep threat'' receivers on this team.

Boldin and Kasper are not slow, but neither do they possess the ability to "stretch the field" with their pure speed.

Poole is an excellent "possession" reciever, a big target, good routes, and generally good hands.


With only Boldin, Kasper and Poole essentially left, there was no one really left to expect to get any real separation on the deep routes.

Both Kasper and Boldin are good "after the catch", but speed demons they are not.
 
OP
OP
RugbyMuffin

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
A huge question still remains.

Why is Reggie Wells, and Gerald Hayes not seeing playing time.

Hayes looks like your pototype MLB for the new age NFl.

Wells supposidly was doing well in the off-season.

See if he can replace the hige priced Davis or Clement.

WHY NOT? IT IS NOT LIKE WE HAVE SOMETHING TO LOSE?

Ugh

FRUSTRATION.

Thanks for answering a few of the others.

I guess the Cards don't have any deep play recievers.

:thumbup:
 

Northern Card

All Star
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Posts
779
Reaction score
0
Location
Ottawa, ON - Canada
Originally posted by RugbyMuffin
A huge question still remains.

Why is Reggie Wells, and Gerald Hayes not seeing playing time.

Hayes looks like your pototype MLB for the new age NFl.

Wells supposidly was doing well in the off-season.

See if he can replace the hige priced Davis or Clement.

WHY NOT? IT IS NOT LIKE WE HAVE SOMETHING TO LOSE?

Ugh

FRUSTRATION.

Thanks for answering a few of the others.

I guess the Cards don't have any deep play recievers.

:thumbup:

Hayes was in a lot of 4 LB sets yesterday and made at least one nice tackle.

Yesterday, was probably McKinnon's best game this year

As for Wells: Well, maybe you've given up on the year, but management, coaches and the players haven't... and so, they'll put the guys who can best ensure success on the field... and right now... that doesn't include Wells subing foe either of our two tackles.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
89,069
Reaction score
41,006
I think the problem is you post the questions on so many threads you forget to read the answers!

I already answered your throw deep question to who?

Gilmore went out, Johnson and McAddley ARE out, who left can get deep?

Blake even said the pick thrown to Kasper he thought Gilmore was in the game and overthrew it thinking the faster WR was running the route. Dumb(they don't exactly look alike) but that's what he said.

I asked before the season started who was going to be the deep threat, I think we expected Gilmore but he seems a bit too injury prone.
 

Shane

My time of year!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
70,145
Reaction score
41,526
Location
Las Vegas
Originally posted by maddogkf
You must be registered for see images

Actually this is one of the things I agree with Tango on!
 
OP
OP
RugbyMuffin

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
We need a Deep Threat?

Get James Jett, Karl Pickens, or Darnay Scott!

HA!

:D
:stupid:
 

danny l

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jul 24, 2003
Posts
221
Reaction score
0
Location
missouri bootheel
Northern Card. I have to disagree about McKinnon. Two week ago he had a very good game. But this week I kinda focused on McKinnon, and at best I would say that he had an average day. In particular on those running plays between the tackles. On the sweeps he did a good job of pursuing, but on the inside runs he more often than not chose the wrong hole to plug. This often led to numerous 6-10 yd. running plays, with the DB's having to make the stop.
 
Top