Quinn may hold out of Browns' camp

Sandan

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
24,762
Reaction score
2,231
Location
Plymouth, UK
Quinn may hold out of Browns' camp

Posted: Sunday June 03, 2007 12:19PM ET

Browns insiders say there's a good chance agent Tom Condon will hold out Brady Quinn once training camp starts. The Browns, despite trading up to make Quinn their second first-round pick, don't really want the rookie quarterback playing early in his rookie season. Browns coaches would like to see Charlie Frye maintain the job. So far, the Browns and Condon have not done much talking.
 

lobo

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Posts
3,310
Reaction score
230
Location
Inverness, Il
Quinn may hold out of Browns' camp

Posted: Sunday June 03, 2007 12:19PM ET

Browns insiders say there's a good chance agent Tom Condon will hold out Brady Quinn once training camp starts. The Browns, despite trading up to make Quinn their second first-round pick, don't really want the rookie quarterback playing early in his rookie season. Browns coaches would like to see Charlie Frye maintain the job. So far, the Browns and Condon have not done much talking.

Ain't my (our) problem. If he does he will be high leve stupid..not a great thing for QB's to miss any time in camp.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,654
Reaction score
30,437
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Anyone want to bet that Levi Brown holds out longer than Brady Quinn?
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,291
Reaction score
14,397
Well -- #5 will be harder to sign than #22, all other things being equal

Fortunately, there isnt a QB bracketing the #5 pick, nor was last year's #5 pick a QB, so that helps

While the Browns are saying the right things, so were the Cards at this point last year -- and Condon was savvy enough to make sure that Matt got paid like a starting QB if he ended up as a starting QB.

I suspect that he will do the same thing at #22.
 

Skkorpion

Grey haired old Bird
LEGACY MEMBER
Supporting Member
Joined
May 9, 2002
Posts
11,026
Reaction score
5
Location
Sun City, AZ
Brady Quinn deserves every misstep that comes his way. By hiring Condon, he guaranteed himself bad advice every step of the way.

Sure enough, it started early with his refusing to work out at the Senior Bowl and the combine and it went downhill from there.
 

Assface

Like a boss
Supporting Member
Joined
May 6, 2003
Posts
15,106
Reaction score
21
Location
Tempe
Anyone want to bet that Levi Brown holds out longer than Brady Quinn?

Sure. Levi was taken #5 overall, he's going to get a good contract, it's just a matter of details. As far as Quinn, Condon is going to use him being a QB to try to get a contract worthy of a higher slotting. Happened with Kyle Boller when he got drafted.
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,961
Reaction score
26,432
Sure. Levi was taken #5 overall, he's going to get a good contract, it's just a matter of details. As far as Quinn, Condon is going to use him being a QB to try to get a contract worthy of a higher slotting. Happened with Kyle Boller when he got drafted.

And, he'll get Quinn that contract too, just watch. There's a reason why some of these agents keep getting hired by the top players no matter how much fans cuss them.
 

Zeno

Ancient
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
15,604
Reaction score
5,476
Location
Fort Myers
The Cardinals history has shown that they rarely sign first round picks on time, it'd be nice to see our first round pick in camp and not have the lone hold out a week or 2 in to training camp...again.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,207
Reaction score
39,832
Why would you think that?

I think Condon probably holds quinn out longer than Brown but I fully expect Brown to be difficult to sign.

AJ Hawk was the 5th pick last year and got 6 years 37.5 million according to FOXsports.

Leinart was the 10th pick last year and got a 6 year deal that COULD be worth 51 million.

It's inevitable that Brown will be tough to sign because he's got 2 benchmarks to use and one of them is out of whack because Leinart got better than slot value last year.
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,961
Reaction score
26,432
I think Condon probably holds quinn out longer than Brown but I fully expect Brown to be difficult to sign.

AJ Hawk was the 5th pick last year and got 6 years 37.5 million according to FOXsports.

Leinart was the 10th pick last year and got a 6 year deal that COULD be worth 51 million.

It's inevitable that Brown will be tough to sign because he's got 2 benchmarks to use and one of them is out of whack because Leinart got better than slot value last year.

Yeah, Brown's deal is not going to be easy to get done. But, hey, he's not starting, so who cares? We've got the T spots locked down by Gandy and Ross. :D :bang:
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,291
Reaction score
14,397
I think Condon probably holds quinn out longer than Brown but I fully expect Brown to be difficult to sign.

AJ Hawk was the 5th pick last year and got 6 years 37.5 million according to FOXsports.

Leinart was the 10th pick last year and got a 6 year deal that COULD be worth 51 million.

It's inevitable that Brown will be tough to sign because he's got 2 benchmarks to use and one of them is out of whack because Leinart got better than slot value last year.

Why would Leinart's contract necessarily be a benchmark?

I get the "well you paid the #10 pick last year X, so we need 120% of X this year" argument that Brown's agent will make, but the Cardinals will reply "QB premium" and the discussion will be over.

I think the far more relevant benchmarks are going to be picks #3, #4, #6 and #7 in this year's draft.

Now, its certainly possible that last year is relevant in that the agent may say: "the Cards caved after three weeks and gave above slot money, so lets hold out"
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,961
Reaction score
26,432
Now, its certainly possible that last year is relevant in that the agent may say: "the Cards caved after three weeks and gave above slot money, so lets hold out"

Exactly. That's why Leinart's contract is very relevant to Brown's.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,207
Reaction score
39,832
Why would Leinart's contract necessarily be a benchmark?

I get the "well you paid the #10 pick last year X, so we need 120% of X this year" argument that Brown's agent will make, but the Cardinals will reply "QB premium" and the discussion will be over.

I think the far more relevant benchmarks are going to be picks #3, #4, #6 and #7 in this year's draft.

Now, its certainly possible that last year is relevant in that the agent may say: "the Cards caved after three weeks and gave above slot money, so lets hold out"


Primarily because we paid over slot value last year. And remember we were on record last year that we don't believe in QB premium, but then we paid it.

I'm guessing Brown gets something in between what Hawk got and what Matt got.

But I can sure see his agent saying we're not taking a deal significantly worse than Matt got, afterall he was 10th, we were 5th.

We'll get it done but it won't be easy, no matter who we picked that was going to be the case. But with our tackle starters it's going to be even harder because they KNOW we need Brown.
 

Gambit

First-Class Second-Rate Poster
Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Posts
3,298
Reaction score
0
Location
Houston, Texas
Primarily because we paid over slot value last year. And remember we were on record last year that we don't believe in QB premium, but then we paid it.

I'm guessing Brown gets something in between what Hawk got and what Matt got.

But I can sure see his agent saying we're not taking a deal significantly worse than Matt got, afterall he was 10th, we were 5th.

We'll get it done but it won't be easy, no matter who we picked that was going to be the case. But with our tackle starters it's going to be even harder because they KNOW we need Brown.

The only thing is, if the Browns don't sign Brady right away, they dont' have Navarre as the starter if something happens to Frye. Derek Anderson can actually win some games for them.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
Primarily because we paid over slot value last year. And remember we were on record last year that we don't believe in QB premium, but then we paid it.

I'm guessing Brown gets something in between what Hawk got and what Matt got.

But I can sure see his agent saying we're not taking a deal significantly worse than Matt got, afterall he was 10th, we were 5th.

We'll get it done but it won't be easy, no matter who we picked that was going to be the case. But with our tackle starters it's going to be even harder because they KNOW we need Brown.

Of course the Cards will be telling Brown he is really only worth #15 money because that is where he was projected and that they only picked him that high because they couldn't work a deal to trade down.

No wait, that was what reports said the "old" Cardinals did.

Nevermind.
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,291
Reaction score
14,397
Primarily because we paid over slot value last year. And remember we were on record last year that we don't believe in QB premium, but then we paid it.

I'm guessing Brown gets something in between what Hawk got and what Matt got.

But I can sure see his agent saying we're not taking a deal significantly worse than Matt got, afterall he was 10th, we were 5th.

We'll get it done but it won't be easy, no matter who we picked that was going to be the case. But with our tackle starters it's going to be even harder because they KNOW we need Brown.


I think what could very well happen is that the Cards wait until #4 and #6 sign.

Although -- Matt contract is as much an issue for picks #6 thorugh #10 as it is for the Cards. Everyone's agent will use that argument.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,513
Reaction score
7,785
I wouldn't be surprised to see the Cards use the argument that Brown should be paid less because he's playing RT instead of LT, which is where the elite money goes.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,207
Reaction score
39,832
I wouldn't be surprised to see the Cards use the argument that Brown should be paid less because he's playing RT instead of LT, which is where the elite money goes.

And if I'm Browns' agent I counter with "what hand does your QB throw with?"
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
And if I'm Browns' agent I counter with "what hand does your QB throw with?"
And if I'm the agent I ask which side of the line the opponents' pass-rushing specialists line-up on.

RT's--even those for lefties--SHOULD make less than LTs, IMO.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,207
Reaction score
39,832
And if I'm the agent I ask which side of the line the opponents' pass-rushing specialists line-up on.

RT's--even those for lefties--SHOULD make less than LTs, IMO.

Sure but any good agent is going to say he's protecting your Qb's blindside.

the draft is all about slotting generally, LT or RT is irrelevant when you pick a guy 5th. To an agent that is.

I think we wind up overpaying to get Brown but we would have done that no matter who we picked because we overpaid for Matt last year.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,471
Reaction score
40,072
Location
Las Vegas
And if I'm the agent I ask which side of the line the opponents' pass-rushing specialists line-up on.

RT's--even those for lefties--SHOULD make less than LTs, IMO.

I still think that is a misconsception. Which side do Strahan and Peppers line up on? There are premier pass rushing DE's on both sides of the DL throughout the league.

Heck the really good ones flop from side to side. I believe in todays NFL they are about as equally important. JMHO.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,654
Reaction score
30,437
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I still think that is a misconsception. Which side do Strahan and Peppers line up on? There are premier pass rushing DE's on both sides of the DL throughout the league.

Heck the really good ones flop from side to side. I believe in todays NFL they are about as equally important. JMHO.

This discussion is kind of useless, but it is the offseason. For what it's worth, Strahan, Peppers, and Little are the exceptions that prove the rule.

Rice, Freeney, Burgess, Will Smith, Justin Smith, Jason Taylor, etc., etc. all line up across from the LOT.
 
Top