Man, you have hated Patrick Peterson relentlessly for a really long time, haven't you? Did he break up with your sister or something?
Would you have trusted Kerwynn Williams to be your starter for a full season?
I don't doubt players of all levels can have surprisingly great games occasionally, but it's about consistency for me.
Did you watch any of these guys play? Outside of McKinnon, none of them could outrun my grandfather.
(Also as I write this the cops are in an armed standoff with the crazy guy in the neighborhood we have a restraining order on for threatening to murder us. What a day.)
I like you dude but you might be the last person in football arguing the pro's of a bell cow RB1.
The Niners were probably the best running team in the league and did it split between Mostert, Jerrick McKinnon and Jeff Wilson. Jeff Wilson was their leading rusher. The Ravens are up there too splitting between Dobbins, Ingram and Edwards. The Pats split heavily between several backs.
Of all the top rushing teams only 2 have any significant mileage between RB1 and RB2 and that's the Titans and Vikings.
The Henry's and McCaffreys of the world are a dying breed.
Running back is the only position on the roster where you can get equal production from 3-4 guys that cost less than a single bellcow.
It also gives you the advantage of not losing a major piece through injury, as we did with Johnson in 2017. You get multiple guys with different abilities allowing you to do different things and you have more bodies for ST's.
The way forward is 3 serviceable guys. I'd be happy with a trio of Edmonds, Gallman and Duke Johnson. Or Edmonds, McKinnon, Peterson. Or Edmonds, Bell, Foreman. Or Edmonds, Gurley, McCoy.
I'm really not worried about the RB room. Plus, a crap tonne of RB's are going to get cut post draft.