xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
....No, I was just trying to get an answer.
Brevin has been hailed as TE3 in this class behind Pitts & Freiermuth. Was juza trying to say he’s better than Pitts or Freiermuth? I’m not the grammar police, but he made that statement confusing.
Etienne returning for his Sr year was a head scratcher. Between carries and receptions he’s got nearly 900 touches and looked less explosive. He cost himself some money.
Your guy Chuba does the same thing though which is I’d rather hope he’s there in the 5th instead of reaching for him in the 3rd.Agree. I've really gone off him. Seems to just run in a straight line fast a lot. See very little from him in the way of cuts or major changes of direction.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I find this thread interesting. Are these guys saying the clip they offer is representative of their overall play? The problem is with this system you can find a good clip on just about every player. What this lacks is often comparison as to how these skills compare to other prospects at this position. There is also little analysis of technique that enabled this skill to be manifested. It’s very superficial. I used to get clips like this sent to me or YouTube links and too often when I went to see the player he was displaying this against a poor opponent or he’d be erratic. Sure the little capsules on the Internet do much the same but usually I know the credentials of the source and can rely that the descriptions are representative. They also typically use numerical designations to facilitate comparing prospects. The best way to judge a prospect is to find a difficult matchup and observe how he does. This is considerably painstaking, but produces the best results.