RB Darrel Williams recently in for visit

juza76

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
13,798
Reaction score
9,618
Location
milan-italy
What route tree is this? Edmonds was the checkdown king. All he did was run 6 yards, turn around and wait for the checkdown. Hence his career average of 7.2 yards per reception which is low for a RB. David Johnson averaged 11-12 during his peak years here and Williams averaged 9.6 YPR last year.

I like Edmonds. He's a good player but he didn't do anything for us in the pass game except 5 yard checkdowns. When did Edmonds ever do this?

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

I consider Williams a complete running back
He is a guy that can be used in third and goal
He is a three downs rb
He is effective in the passing game, which is important for KK offense

Btw Edmonds yards for catch Were not impressive, not cause of him but for the stubbornness of KK insisting throwing the football behind the line of scrimmage after a second from the snap, which rarely works
I see Mahomes making the screen passes but after moving around the pocket, gaining more seconds and making the defenses more vulnerable
 
Last edited:

Dayman

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Posts
6,121
Reaction score
7,974
Location
Portland, Oregon
What route tree is this? Edmonds was the checkdown king. All he did was run 6 yards, turn around and wait for the checkdown. Hence his career average of 7.2 yards per reception which is low for a RB. David Johnson averaged 11-12 during his peak years here and Williams averaged 9.6 YPR last year.

I like Edmonds. He's a good player but he didn't do anything for us in the pass game except 5 yard checkdowns. When did Edmonds ever do this?

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Edmonds played 20% of his snaps in the slot and 9% on the outside last year.
 

cardpa

Have a Nice Day!
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
7,406
Reaction score
4,152
Location
Monroe NC
Williams is nice depth, give the starter a rest type of back. He is certainly not the same type of RB Edmonds was. It would be more like adding another Conner to the RB room. Their YPC are almost the same. Certainly not a game changer.
 

RON_IN_OC

https://www.ronevansrealty.com
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
27,185
Reaction score
35,682
Location
BirdGangThing
All great but is he being signed?
My guess is he has a take it or leave it offer on the table from the Cardinals. The Cardinals won't get super aggressive with a guy like Williams until they see how the draft goes. If they don't find a running back in the draft that could fill the role they have for him, then maybe they switch up their offer and pursue in a little bit harder.
 

QuebecCard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Posts
5,892
Reaction score
8,325
Location
North of the 49th.
My guess is he has a take it or leave it offer on the table from the Cardinals. The Cardinals won't get super aggressive with a guy like Williams until they see how the draft goes. If they don't find a running back in the draft that could fill the role they have for him, then maybe they switch up their offer and pursue in a little bit harder.

Doubt it. (IMO)

RBs in the secondary and tertiary market are desperate to find homes before the draft. Opportunities and income much beyond the minimum wage are hard to come by after that date.
 
Last edited:

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,492
Reaction score
41,045
Location
UK
Doubt it. (IMO)

RBs in the secondary and tertiary market are desperate to find homes before the draft. Opportunities and income much beyond the minimum wage are hard to come by after date.

This. If you're a RB still on the market come draft time your likely not getting a job unless someone gets injured.
 

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
72,822
Reaction score
24,463
Location
Killjoy Central
Him or eno though who would u want? Me eno yess because he a devil lol
IDK. Conner is 6'2", Williams is 5'11", and Eno is 5'9". The fact that they are actively looking at other running backs leads one to believe they are not comfortable promoting from within the ranks or are looking for a different type of back.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,470
Location
Charlotte, NC
IDK. Conner is 6'2", Williams is 5'11", and Eno is 5'9". The fact that they are actively looking at other running backs leads one to believe they are not comfortable promoting from within the ranks or are looking for a different type of back.
Or are just looking at depth. It's a smart play if the money is right.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,354
Reaction score
40,498
Location
Colorado
IDK. Conner is 6'2", Williams is 5'11", and Eno is 5'9". The fact that they are actively looking at other running backs leads one to believe they are not comfortable promoting from within the ranks or are looking for a different type of back.
I think it is a good idea for your players to win their spots vs being given them. Darrell Williams is not much competition and if they can't beat him out, they probably aren't long for the league.
 

daves

Keepin' it real!
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2003
Posts
3,530
Reaction score
7,225
Location
Orange County, CA
By “similar” they mean “(don’t look at their yards per carry).”
Yards per carry is lower than Edmonds', but yards per catch is higher.
That’s why I said “carry.”
I wasn't correcting your post, I was adding to it.

The point of your post seemed to be that their numbers are NOT similar, since Williams' yards per carry are lower. But a big part of Edmonds' value was as a pass catching back, and Williams' yards per CATCH are significantly better. So in that context, their numbers ARE overall similar, or perhaps favor Williams.

...dave
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,459
Reaction score
68,705
See… I think this is another example of the type of misrepresentation of the past I mentioned in the other thread that is continually leading to flame wars and attacks.

I remember most people thinking it was an okay to solid signing and the board was generally in agreement that it shored up our depth in the running backs room.

And after finding the thread, that’s pretty much what I found:


Well, that and that “darksiders” words were twisted and posters tried pretty hard to start fights with them when none really existed. There were two pretty vocal dissenters but that’s true with any player that’s ever signed. Did people go crazy for it? No, but a 21 page thread doesn’t exactly say apathy to me.
 
Last edited:

BritCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Posts
22,492
Reaction score
41,045
Location
UK
See… I think this is another example of the type of misrepresentation of the past I mentioned in the other thread that is continually leading to flame wars and attacks.

I remember most people thinking it was an okay to solid signing and the board was generally in agreement that it shored up our depth in the running backs room.

And after finding the thread, that’s pretty much what I found:


Well, that and that “darksiders” words were twisted and posters tried pretty hard to start fights with them when none really existed. There were two pretty vocal dissenters but that’s true with any player that’s ever signed. Did people go crazy for it? No, but a 21 page thread doesn’t exactly say apathy to me.

There were a tonne of posts about how garbage our RB room was all last off season. That thread is full of it.

Also full of darksider vs lightsider arguing again. The usual folk saying Conner was between cooked and meh and the usual folk saying it was a good move.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,888
Posts
5,412,423
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top