Redsz
We do this together
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2004
- Posts
- 4,965
- Reaction score
- 2,659
One great play? There is one obvious example that I'm sure you can think of Stout.
Redsz said:One great play? There is one obvious example that I'm sure you can think of Stout.
Stout said:Thank you, Redsz, for providing the quote I hoped and knew I'd get. ONE good play. Unfortunately, one lucky play in a game that didn't matter, albeit on a good throw, clouds many opinions and makes people seem to think he may have a future. Because of one play.
Quick, tell me another 'great' play he's made? *crickets chirping*
Now, he may end up a serviceable QB---I don't think he will, but he may---but great? I reaaaaaally doubt it.
Redsz said:What about when he ran for the first down in Miami to sustain the game winning drive? Then threw the TD pass to Fitzgerald to win the game?
Or what about his play during the Rams game where he threw two touchdown passes and ran for two more?
Or the plays he made during the come-back vs SF this year? Such as the two point conversion run?
There has been more than 'one' great play Stout. And I think you know that.
Stout said:Lol at this point, to prognosticate that he'll be a GREAT player. Not a good player, not a solid player, but a GREAT player, which was the prediction I'm bashing.
LoyaltyisaCurse said:I wouldn't call it being an apologist or making excuses, what I see is a young QB with only 18 starts that I believe is going to be a great QB.
Redsz said:Or the plays he made during the come-back vs SF this year? Such as the two point conversion run?
.
LoyaltyisaCurse said:I wouldn't call it being an apologist or making excuses, what I see is a young QB with only 18 starts that I believe is going to be a great QB. .
LoyaltyisaCurse said:DOH!
Stout said:.
I myself have seen him make many poor, awful, and sometimes idiotic mistakes that players in their THIRD SEASON, NOT their ROOKIE season, should not be making. For every decent or good play (er, how many great plays have we seen?) we've seen probably 30 or so bad ones. I'm just baffled as to what people see that lead them to believe he'll be a solid starting QB, let alone a 'great' QB.
Stout said:S'all good, homey. I've done plenty worse in my day. Have a drink on me
Maybe the alcohol will purge you of delusional ideas about McCown
Stout said:Lol Okay. The Miami game? He had a couple of good plays and helped win the game. No denying that. After he tried to first lose the game, ala Plummer. Great? Cha, right.
His plays against the Rams? Pretty damn good. Great? C'mon.
His comeback against San Fran? Don't you mean his FAILED comeback ATTEMPT? Mmm hmm.
Sure, he's made more than one 'great' play, but they can likely be numbered on one hand. Not nearly enough, at this point, to prognosticate that he'll be a GREAT player. Not a good player, not a solid player, but a GREAT player, which was the prediction I'm bashing.
LoyaltyisaCurse said:I'll make a deal with you, only if McCown remains the starter:
He must lead the team to the playoffs with a solid season and you will change your name to McCown4Life.
If he stinks it up next year, I will change my name to Stout is Always right.
Each screen name change will be intact for a period not exceeding one off-season. After which we may resume to original screen names.
Deal?
Stout said:No way, ese! I'd be rooting to change my screen name to THAT? Lol Because, contrary as it may sound, if McCown starts and becomes that QB to lead us to the playoffs, I'll be tickled to death.
Now, a month? I can deal with a month. An offseason? No thanks
Stout said:Ah, wait...I see you say 'only if McCown remains the starter'. Uh-uh, man. Right here, right now, you have to be saying it. No 'buy out' clause, like, 'oh, he didn't become the starter, so I don't have to do it'
LoyaltyisaCurse said:No buyout clause, I just want it to be decided on the field, now if Green decides to bring in a Bledsoe and announce him starting QB, chances are Josh might be gone...
Now, if he brings in another QB and announces open competetion in camp and he loses out I am all for it...
..Stout said:Okay, at least as long as there is a semblence of open competition in camp. Fair enough.
BigRedMO said:Why do McCown apologists feel the need to defend him in a post regarding FA QBs? I have news for you. There will be at least one new face in camp this summer at the QB position. So defending McCown in a post about FA QBs is pointless. There will be a FA and possibly a draftee. There is no way Green is going in to camp with Mccown and Navarre as his only options. For Green to do that you would have to think he is insane, a masochist, or does not want a job being a head coach in the NFL. Get used to it. There will be new face(s) at QB this summer.
BigRedMO said:I would like to have some Mccown free posts. The lines are drawn regarding his future. Everybody knows where everybody else stands. There is no new light to shed on the issue. All the arguements are subjective so there is noway for anybody to win until the decision is made. We now have to wait until the decision is made.
Why do McCown apologists feel the need to defend him in a post regarding FA QBs? I have news for you. There will be at least one new face in camp this summer at the QB position. So defending McCown in a post about FA QBs is pointless. There will be a FA and possibly a draftee. There is no way Green is going in to camp with Mccown and Navarre as his only options. For Green to do that you would have to think he is insane, a masochist, or does not want a job being a head coach in the NFL. Get used to it. There will be new face(s) at QB this summer.
BigRedMO said:If I have commented on Mccown in a post regarding FA QBs without Mccown being brought up by his defenders first then I have been wrong. I dont think I have ever done that.
I wasn't speaking directly to you. Just bringing up the fact that it has happened.
Mccown certainly has no where to go but up. 29th rated QB out of 30 who qualified.