Can’t believe they added the part about Sarver asking Taylor Griffin about shaving his balls and then reaching out to Griffin about it. They had what they needed but clearly reached on other parts. I think given the writer’s reputation he probably didn’t want to add it and the higher ups at ESPN went overboard for affect. Shultz teasing it and allowing the Suns to get in front of it didn’t help
The Griffin thing helped establish Server's character as being a wanna-be jock who acts like a frat boy. I think there was more wrong with Sarver's behavior there than a lot of the other named anecdotes, primarily Watson and Williamson. It seemed odd how Taylor's story was positioned compared to those since it seemed to be brief and inserted just to get people to see what sort of guy Sarver is while it was one of the most unquestionably inappropriate things he did that was included. That should have been the lead, it would have been more impactful than the Watson stuff that did lead, and read as assumptions and sour grapes.
Im really curious what sort of stuff wasn't included because you'd think the most damning accounts and accusations would be featured but there wasn't much there that looked all that damning. Yes, he's an a-hole but most people knew that. Maybe more is there that needs to be properly investigated but if the worst they have on him is in the article then it'll be a hard sell to other owners to push him out.