Having had time to digest, here are my thoughts:
1. Nothing surprises me here. Sarver has a reputation as being a dick head. Heard this from multiple people either with the Suns or from UofA. If any of this is true, it shouldnt shock anyone.
2. It's unethical journalism for a journalist to scoop another's story a week in advance. Sounds like ESPN had been working on this for months before. All this to be revealed by a random journalist through a tweet. Schultz deserves to take some heat here.
3. At the same time, ESPN is the same outlet that jumped the gun on a report that Ayton was paid $100k to attend UofA, which was categorically destroyed by other outlets to the point in which the original reporter went AWOL on social media three+ years later. I'd imagine that Mark Schlabach is not in charge of the Sarver story, so it should still carry water.
4. If any of this is true, Sarver has to sell the team and **** of the NBA.
5. This is not going to be good for the team on the court. Here's another story that's taking attention away from the Finals appearance to focus on the controversial nature of the front office and ownership. I can see this being a distraction and impacting the product on the floor. Now we get questions about Ayton and Sarver? Ugh.