Ryan Lindley

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,495
Reaction score
5,740
Location
Scarsdale, NY
He seems like the poster boy for a third string QB. He has size, and arm strength, but needs development. I don't know enough about mechanics, but I'm guessing his are bad. Hopefully, they'll improve as he gets coached up. Looked like he can move around in the pocket but not out of the pocket, not being very athletic. That's why he had to take an intentional grounding penalty late in the game. I'm hoping his low completion percentage, in college and last Sunday, were due to poor mechanics and that they can be improved. Looks like a good late round pick, that will take a couple of years to develop, if he ever does. If KK can come back, Lindley probably means the end of Rich Bartel as a Cardinal.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
You can see the arm strength and you can see slight improvement in decisionmaking and accuracy, but the consistency nowhere near where it needs to be.

Like many raw rookies, he'd make a few impressive throws, but then, on two successive plays inside the NO 10-yard line, miss wide-open receivers in the end zone and then throw a pick.

You can see the upside, and you can track the improvement, but, as with many rookie QB's, the 64-hundred dollar question will be whether or not he'll continue to improve - and at what rate.

I thought he came into camp, somewhat behind Bartel on the depth chart. As of today, I'd rate the two dead-even with plenty of time in preseason for that to change.

(Final note - Kolb's lack of durability may determine who stays and who goes - If you were sure you had 2 durable QB's, you might opt to keep the #3 QB with the highest upside (Lindley). But if you only had one durable QB, you might opt for more experience (Bartel)
 

MadCardDisease

Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
20,760
Reaction score
14,655
Location
Chandler, Az
According to Somers, Skelton looked shaky today against the Cheifs. Lindley on the other hand had a pretty good practice and was the best of the bunch during redzone drills (of couse Kold was still sidelined).
 
Last edited:

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
117,703
Reaction score
57,917
I wouldn't want the Cardinals to play Bartel for experience sake because if they need to use him they are going to lose anyway. If Kolb should remove himself from the equation, I would want to go with Skelton, Lindley and Bartel in that order. There is no future with Bartel other than a third QB.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,270
Reaction score
6,199
Location
Dallas, TX
According to Somers, Skelton looked shaky today against the Cheifs. Lindley on the other hand had a pretty good practice and was the best of the bunch during redzone drills (of couse Kold was still sidelined).

I watch all of what the NFLN showed live today in 7 on 7 & Skelton completed very few of his attempts :bang:
 

artp

Registered
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
1,085
Reaction score
7
Location
Little Rock
He seems like the poster boy for a third string QB. He has size, and arm strength, but needs development. I don't know enough about mechanics, but I'm guessing his are bad. Hopefully, they'll improve as he gets coached up. Looked like he can move around in the pocket but not out of the pocket, not being very athletic. That's why he had to take an intentional grounding penalty late in the game. I'm hoping his low completion percentage, in college and last Sunday, were due to poor mechanics and that they can be improved. Looks like a good late round pick, that will take a couple of years to develop, if he ever does. If KK can come back, Lindley probably means the end of Rich Bartel as a Cardinal.

QB R Lindley already means the end of R Bartel as a Cardinal QB
 

seesred

Registered User
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
28
Location
section 8 row 10
I watched the NFL station and they were live at the KC Cards practice. Skelton IMO hit like ten in a row. He did make some over throws, but on the seven on seven he looked good. I don't know what Sommers was watching!

Roberts caught everything and 17 caught evrery ball his way as did number 15. It was fun to watch as everyone was in the mix making plays.

GBR
40
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
117,703
Reaction score
57,917
There are game players and then there are practice players. Skelton is at his worst when he thinks too much instead of reacts.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
I watch all of what the NFLN showed live today in 7 on 7 & Skelton completed very few of his attempts :bang:

MadCardDisease According to Somers, Skelton looked shaky today against the Cheifs. Lindley on the other hand had a pretty good practice and was the best of the bunch during redzone drills (of couse Kold was still sidelined).

Awesome. That's what we heard from Camp last week and Double Deuce was money Sunday. But unless he has improved from last season in his throwing it won't matter in the real games and we'll be 5-11, again.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,270
Reaction score
6,199
Location
Dallas, TX
Awesome. That's what we heard from Camp last week and Double Deuce was money Sunday. But unless he has improved from last season in his throwing it won't matter in the real games and we'll be 5-11, again.
I still say we bring in Colt when he gets axed since he's now 3rd string, but I know we won't.
 

Camshaft

Registered
Joined
Jul 19, 2002
Posts
338
Reaction score
71
Location
Austin, TX
Impressions

I was impressed with his arm strength but a lot of fuddyduddies have arm strenth. The thing I was really excited about was how quick his release can be when it needs to. Also, to a lessor extent, his football speed and field of sight were impressive.
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,503
Reaction score
2,318
Location
ASFN
I like what I have seen from Lindley so far. Imo Bartell is a gonner.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
According to Somers, Skelton looked shaky today against the Cheifs. Lindley on the other hand had a pretty good practice and was the best of the bunch during redzone drills (of couse Kold was still sidelined).
NFLN showed highlights of the workout; so I got to see some of it. My perception was closer to SeesRed's than BuckyBird's. (Goes to show you; beauty or lack thereof is, indeed, evident in the eye of the beholder).

Skelton started out by overthrowing his receiver (so what's new?) compelling the announcer to point out that "he has to work on his consistency." He then settled down and completed a bunch of passes (including one over the middle that Floyd managed to hang onto despite getting thumped by the DB). I'm not sure if it was Skelton or Lindley who hit Byrd for a pretty TD deep down the right sideline.

Lindley did look pretty good out there, consistently hitting receivers.

Then Bartel took some snaps but missed his receivers more than once or twice.

Cautionary note - It was 7 on 7. There was no pass-rush pressure (which removed the big issue we need to deal with when evaluating these dudes). All of the QB's should have been hitting their receivers 100% of the time.
 
Last edited:

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
I like Lindley but can we afford Lindley is the question. I know it is not Whiz's style to keep a lot of Qbs on the rosters but our QB situation is questionable at best. I would keep Lindley on the PS and sign Matt Moore or McCoy to go along with Skelton and Kolb.

We have the cap space, a 1 yr deal is not much of a risk and again the position is not being locked down by any QB in the current group. It makes too much sense to bring in a guy like Matt Moore who has shown to be, at best servicable. Even better, both are used to playing behind bad OLs.

Kolb is still running around too much. Skelton still has the mental block, in which he starts off horribly with his passing. It is not a promising situation so far.



Sent from Rugbymuffin's Super Phone
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
I like Lindley but can we afford Lindley is the question.
It centers on 2 factors: (1) Kolb's health/viability and (2) whether Bartel's experience edge over Lindley is considered enough to make any difference.

If the coaches feel comfortable enough with Skelton & Kolb (in either order), they might feel they can get away with going with the bigger upside of the less-experienced Lindley. But if Kolb's durability remained enough of an issue that might risk going into the season with only one seasoned QB (Skelton), they might feel more secure with the more experienced Bartel as #3.
 
Last edited:

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,476
Reaction score
16,649
Location
San Antonio, Texas
Lindley did throw the best pass in my opinion of the game against the Saints which was a dart, hitting the moving receiver in the numbers which was DROPPED!
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
117,703
Reaction score
57,917
I'd cringe if the Cardinals kept Bartel over Lindley. There is no future with Bartel. There may be a future with Lindley.
 

cardpa

Have a Nice Day!
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
7,401
Reaction score
4,145
Location
Monroe NC
I watched the game second half last night and thought Lindley looked pretty good for a rookie. I liked that he threw the ball away instead of forcing it. He seemed to see the field pretty good. His receivers had a couple of drops at a bad time. I don't recall him forcing any throw into coverage. This to me is a good start. Seems to be a bit ahead of the learning curve.
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,503
Reaction score
2,318
Location
ASFN
I watched the game second half last night and thought Lindley looked pretty good for a rookie. I liked that he threw the ball away instead of forcing it. He seemed to see the field pretty good. His receivers had a couple of drops at a bad time. I don't recall him forcing any throw into coverage. This to me is a good start. Seems to be a bit ahead of the learning curve.

I saw the same.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
We need to stop fooling ourselves. I don't think there's a QBoF on the roster right now. Heck, I think there's only a QB of the Now on the roster by default--"now" is here and we have what we have.

I hope I'm wrong and Kolb can settle down in the pocket or Skelton can find more accuracy...but the Magic 8-Ball says "future does not look good."
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
We need to stop fooling ourselves. I don't think there's a QBoF on the roster right now. Heck, I think there's only a QB of the Now on the roster by default--"now" is here and we have what we have.

I hope I'm wrong and Kolb can settle down in the pocket or Skelton can find more accuracy...but the Magic 8-Ball says "future does not look good."

At least there's the hope that Stout is right and Skelton's troubles are a result of simply not having high level coaching and competition in college and not getting enough reps and detailed coaching in practice with the Cardinals. There's always that second SF game to hang our hats on.

But I'm not going to hold my breath too long. We've waited for other scatter armed QBs to improve before and it hasn't happened. That's why I thought it was ridiculous to draft Lindley. Even as late as they did. He was scatter armed in college!

I have little hope that Kolb will be good enough or healthy enough to allow the Cards to win games. No matter how well the defense plays. To me he just doesn't have the physical or mental makeup to be a winning NFL QB.

So, yeah, I agree with your Magic 8-Ball.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,270
Reaction score
6,199
Location
Dallas, TX
We need to stop fooling ourselves. I don't think there's a QBoF on the roster right now. Heck, I think there's only a QB of the Now on the roster by default--"now" is here and we have what we have.

I hope I'm wrong and Kolb can settle down in the pocket or Skelton can find more accuracy...but the Magic 8-Ball says "future does not look good."

:thumbup: I've been saying the same thing for a year now & why I wanted us to go all in for Luck or RGIII
 
Top