B-Dogg
Registered
Now this is someone I would be very happy if they brought in.
He's been recovering from a knee injury, had knee surgery in January.
Hmmm, just what we need. A one-legged tackle.
Hmmm, just what we need. A one-legged tackle.
Hmmm, just what we need. A one-legged tackle.
Hi guys, Saints fan here (I lurk here from time to time )
Anyway, Jon Stinchcomb is probably one of the, if not them most respected members of the Saints and one of the classiest guys you would ever meet. With that said, his days are done. I dont know if he is done for good, but for the time being, he is done. He played through injuries last season and was simply horrid, he had surgery in the off season and I guess the staff hoped he would bounce back but he is a shell of his former self. He almost got Brees killed in the preseason game we just had Friday.
As much as we hated to see him go, we knew there had to be a change because he was simply a liability at right tackle. If he let Zach Strief beat him out you know its bad. It had nothing to do with money because we still took a cap hit with his release. So If I were you guys, I wouldnt touch him. But I do hope he lands on his feet.
One problem with signing guys like Stinchcomb, is that it hurts the development of younger players on your squad. Keith had some good moments and bad moments in pass protection last year, but he is an tenacious run blocker. His last two games before his injury last year, Keith was playing very well.
So if the team signs Stinchcomb, who according to the above Saints fan is done, then Keith moves back to the bench and doesn't get the chance to develop on the field. Let's be realistic; signing guys like Stinchcomb at best is a bandaid, at worst stunts the development of future prospects.
Let some of these guys play this year and we'll identify whether they need to be replaced in the future.
For the most part, what you say is very true. Occasionally, however, a guy like him becomes a cap hit, and in that case we might do well to take a look.