The Kolb trade, and the Kolb extensions are two different things. Two different decisions. If Larry had somehow wanted to walk if we didn't seem serious in acquiring a QB. That's what the trade is about. The extension?
The Kolb trade was bad.
Giving him a contract when he was still under one under the assumption that if not, he was going to tear it up and need a bigger one was idiotic.
New system, question marks about the lockout and his time to assimilate the offense, and that he would have had to come in that year and perform as well as Kurt Warner ever had to earn anything significantly more that what he got made our extension completely idiotic.
We could have signed him to a short one year extension (at most) or had him play out his current high paying contract.
No way was he going to get much more, and if he earned it, he earned it. You'd then be signing a known quantity. Anything short of 4000 yards and 30 td's, and we could of signed him to something relatively similar to what we did.
It's also a flat cap year, and the owners/front office saw the writing on the wall even better then us fans did. It was pretty obvious it wasn't going up very much and won't for the next couple of years.
The trade was bad. The extension was idiotic.
Larry wanted to see us trying, because anyone would. It is a stretch to say he would have left if we didn't get Kolb. But even if he put a gun to our head to make the trade.....the extension is another animal.
Personally if I was a player, and the front office came to me and said, we really want you to re-sign, and we're going to try to fix the QB situation. We see this guy Kolb, and we're going to do everything we can to trade for him.......
..... If he performs as expected, we'll lock him up, but if he doesn't work out, we'll still have the cap room to go after another guy. We're committed to finding a QB, not pretending to. We're not going to sign any guy for the sake of signing/trading for a guy and pretending he's the answer. Just like you, we want a real answer.
Which one would have impressed Larry more? Hoping and praying that giving a potential bum QB a contract turns him into a player, or continually doing what's necessary to find that QB, and give THAT person a contract.
The Cards front office picked up pennies in front of a steamroller thinking they found their QB, and counting their chickens before they hatched, not because they had, but because they fooled themselves into thinking someone who had little experience, and had been knocked out of his first game as THE starter because of a concussion, warranted such a leap of faith. By doing so, they'd be a leg up cap space wise against the competition.
Fact is, Kolb was under contract, and we should have made him play it out to see what he had. That would have been the ideal scenario. The next to ideal would have been to give him a one year extension for up to ten million, and if he performed well during the 2011 or 2012 seasons to our front office's satisfaction, then open negotiations and work on a long term deal.
We bought what was behind door #3, because if it turned out right, we'd be ahead by a few million in cap space. Instead we got a lawnmower, consistently rolling around on the ground.
What's done is done. But when looking back, we have to realize the Kolb situation is two bad decisions. Not just one. If one was somehow necessary to keep Fitz (a very debatable one), the other surely was not.