This is the second time I've been accused of making 'incredible leaps and assumptions' in the last week or so so let me run through what I said so that I don't falsely get accused of it again.
1. Miami is a nice city with great weather on the East coast that's nearer eastern europe that have won 2 titles of late.
This is fact.
2. Goran has no Bosh for now - bad luck for him as he'll probably get paid less than if Bosh was there to help him.
Bosh is out for the rest of the season so if we can agree that Dragic "probably plays better with a P&R player" (e.g. Dragic with Frye and / or Bosh) and that point guards "probably produce better output when playing with better players" (e.g. Dragic with / without Bledsoe or Dragic with / without Bosh) then I don't think it's an assumption to say "Dragic is unlucky to be without Bosh" as he will probably produce less without him. And as the NBA (and the real world) will logically reward individuals with higher pay for higher production then what I said is more a logical statement than an assumption - agreed?
3. Either way, i'd bet that Goran stays with Miami this offseason on a smaller contract regardless because he would have given his word to Miami. Just my view but I bet it's true....
Saying "i'd bet he stays in Miami" is just that - a bet, not an assumption. I have proposed a 'record of forecasts' for this board so that we might work out, over time, who is best at 'forecasting outcomes'. Anyway, it's a bet and it's on the record.
4. ...from all accounts he took less money to rejoin the suns the second time round....
http://www.brightsideofthesun.com/2014/2/4/5376198/year-dragon-evolution-phoenix-suns-star-goran-dragic
I accept it's not the clearest proof - the article simply refers to "a favourable deal for the suns" - but the general consensus
from the internet is that we got a great "home town" deal. I post this article not only because of this reference but also because of its comment about Blanks' "basketball genius"; an ironic statement if there ever was one.
To sum up; from all sources I've read, Dragic taking less money is more likely to be fact than assumption.
5. ...because he wants to be in a good situation more than anything else.
Again, I'm not sure that there's any proof he wanted to be traded to losing teams but the Lakers and Heat, while not being great now, aren't long-term losing clubs (the Suns aren't either but based on recent events i.e. during the "Sarver without Nash" era are, unfortunately, heading in that direction), while the Knicks definitely are a losing club but they are a big market, attractive club and does anyone really think Jackson won't turn it around? There's a guy who's better than 50/50 to succeed, even though it won't happen over night. Dragic is not old so would have had plenty of time to grow with them while being the lead guard.
So Steve - unless I'm missing something, are you able to retract your view that I've made "incredible leaps and incredible claims"?