http://www.azcentral.com/video/2503595053001
This is the most sensible he's ever been. It sounds like he's showing signs of maturity.
This is the most sensible he's ever been. It sounds like he's showing signs of maturity.
Not sure if that was a troll or what, but that video is something about a guy that ripped off his own penis and I had my kids in the room.
This is the most sensible he's ever been. It sounds like he's showing signs of maturity.
that video is something about a guy that ripped off his own penis
I love the suggestion that ripping off his own penis could be the most sensible thing Sarver has done since purchasing the Suns.
Kinda ironic that he's wearing purple considering he's trying so hard to get it out of our team colors.
It's amazing the things he gets blamed for. I doubt he has any more than the smallest involvement in the new uniforms.
Steve
It's amazing the things he gets blamed for. I doubt he has any more than the smallest involvement in the new uniforms.
Steve
Speaking of logos, interesting how Sarver mentions the deeper purple of his Suns shirt at the end of the interview.
This is a guy, who in that very interview wouldn't say he's going to back away from making basketball decisions. The guy is a micromanager of the HIGHEST order, he absolutely is involved/in charge of uniform and color decisions.
I guess I better listen to it again as I walked away with almost the opposite interpretation. I thought he denied having much involvement in basketball decisions. Cooper asked him about it and he said that he'd never had much involvement in basketball decisions except for pretty much being the tiebreaker guy (in the Dragic signing for example).
Steve
Really? He's the owner, I'd be surprised if any major decision didn't have his fingerprints all over it.
Pretty funny to see the fan reaction over the new colors/logos, I'd say overwhelmingly negative isn't strong enough.
No more delusional "win now" speak. That's progress, I think.
I guess I better listen to it again as I walked away with almost the opposite interpretation. I thought he denied having much involvement in basketball decisions. Cooper asked him about it and he said that he'd never had much involvement in basketball decisions except for pretty much being the tiebreaker guy (in the Dragic signing for example).
Steve
I'm on my phone now so it's tricky for me to re watch, but Bickley said something like "you told me you'll be getting out of the way of basketball ops a little more now, is that right?" And Sarver didn't go along with that notion. He tried to twist it as if he's never been that involved in basketball decisions, which we know is horse crap since he was the one responsible for the Hedo/Warrick/Childress mess.
He never said "never". I think this is a case of your hatred painting your interpretation of what he said. I'll not deny he has more input than he said, but remember what was the state of the front office during that Hedo/Warrick/Childress mess. He had unqualified people giving him advice because he didn't HAVE a front office at the time. He wanted to improve the team and his low-level advisors told him to do it a certain way. He shouldn't have listened.
Fine he claimed to be minimally involved, which again, we know isn't true. Remember Kerr has said it was Sarver who pushed for the idea that the Suns must get under the cap at all costs, thus leading to the KT trade.
Plus giving him a pass because the front office was a mess is silly, it was a mess because of Sarver! That's like giving a pass to a long tenured college coach because he doesn't have good players on his team, he's the recruiter, that's his fault!