xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I think the Rams are overrated. Their D sucks. I’ll be surprised if the Cowboys don’t win this. Goff is not as good as people think.
They sure do. But that was a good catchRams need to answer with a td
This makes Houston look pathetic.
it seemed like he didn't have to do much because they were pushing dallas backwards all game. but he made key plays when needed and also missed some throws to allow the cowboys to stay in the game.Just out of curiosity, how would those who watched the game describe Goff's performance against the Cowboys? On the Rams chat someone specifically asked how Goff was doing and I had the gall to call his 15/28, 186 yard, 0TD/0INT 72.9 rating game was "mediocre". This started a barrage of "troll" "F you" and "pathetic" responses. Fans can be such homers.
Just out of curiosity, how would those who watched the game describe Goff's performance against the Cowboys? On the Rams chat someone specifically asked how Goff was doing and I had the gall to call his 15/28, 186 yard, 0TD/0INT 72.9 rating game was "mediocre". This started a barrage of "troll" "F you" and "pathetic" responses. Fans can be such homers.
Hence...mediocre?it seemed like he didn't have to do much because they were pushing dallas backwards all game. but he made key plays when needed and also missed some throws to allow the cowboys to stay in the game.
I would use the words efficient or adequate before I would say mediocre.Just out of curiosity, how would those who watched the game describe Goff's performance against the Cowboys? On the Rams chat someone specifically asked how Goff was doing and I had the gall to call his 15/28, 186 yard, 0TD/0INT 72.9 rating game was "mediocre". This started a barrage of "troll" "F you" and "pathetic" responses. Fans can be such homers.
I'd like to call it that but he had plenty of poor passes that were all on him in a game where he was touched only once. Not sacked, just hit once. He did have some good plays along with the bad plays but to me, efficient means he completed 60-65% passes for low to medium yardage without any turnovers. It was less than that IMO.I would use the words efficient or adequate before I would say mediocre.
And this why we need an O-Line
Their running game is truly dominant right now and it's keeping pressure off of Goff. Zero sacks and 1 pressure is all the gave up in the passing game and is why I'm critical of Goff's mediocre stat line. He is facing virtually no pressure and is being carried by a beastly running game and still not consistently completing passes or producing points in the red zone.The Rams’ OL might just win them a SB.
It was all about their run game last night and Dallas doing nothing to stop it.I would use the words efficient or adequate before I would say mediocre.
I guess you could say that. Hard for me to think that way last night because I was watching the cowboys get their butts whipped.Hence...mediocre?
Goff made the throws when the Rams needed him to. There were also a few drops on otherwise catchable passes. Goff in general is way more than mediocre.Just out of curiosity, how would those who watched the game describe Goff's performance against the Cowboys? On the Rams chat someone specifically asked how Goff was doing and I had the gall to call his 15/28, 186 yard, 0TD/0INT 72.9 rating game was "mediocre". This started a barrage of "troll" "F you" and "pathetic" responses. Fans can be such homers.