Seattle @ Green Bay

[RugbyMuffin]

congrats to the pack - just too much on a day like today

good season by my hawks as well - they'll be back next year

Nope.
They won't cause they are not winning the division next year.

 

[RugbyMuffin]

I was laughing at that one as well. I don't know if he was watching tape of a game 2 years ago or what, but Alexander sucked hard in that game. It was nice to watch the Hags get beat down, I can't stand them. Hasslebeck just complained like a baby the entire game.

Next year, they won't have to worry about it cause next year the Cardinals win the NFC West.

Yes, this was soooooooooo much fun to watch.

My friend was saying "It's 14-0 and the Pack can't stop the Seahawks" I just laughed and said " Let's see what happens when the Hawks aren't given the ball 20 yards for the endzone" Then the Pack just pounded on the Seahawks.

That was embarrassing. The Seahawks who who I though they were !

It is always fun watching Hasselbeck whine and cry too. Especially when he is losing.

I can't wait for the Sunday Seattle paper to make the standard 2,000 excuses about how the refs gave GB the game, and how the snow played a factor, etc., etc.

 

[football karma]

so strange

how that defense can look so good at home and look so bad on the road

 

[Gee!]

Celebrate good times..

You must be registered for see images attach

 

[DaisyCutter]

yeah - i mean, what would the hawks do if they had to play powerhouses like the jets, dolphins, raiders, chiefs, broncos, ravens, bengals and bills

the mighty 10 win browns needed OT to beat this horrible road team and even somehow found themselves down by over 10 points in the 4th quarter

this year both conferences had team win the exact # of games (last year the AFC won 16 more games than the NFC as a conference)

the AFC is more top heavy but Seattle would still be a good chance at the playoffs over there

a team like cincy went 1-3 against the NFC West and still finished with 7 wins (meaning they went 6-6 against everyone else)

Seattle is a good team playing better at the end of the year than at the beginning. The mid-year shift back in offensive philosophy, to the west coast offense of Holmgren's coaching roots, was both bold and fruitful.

Seattle's overall defensive excellence continues to be ignored (not by Green Bay's coaches, I'll warrant.)

I like Seattle. I respect their coach, I like their team, their QB, their offensive balance, in essence, everything about them. And I want them to represent the NFCW well.

I think they can win in Green Bay, hope they do, hope they win the NFC title and meet San Diego in the Super Bowl.

Yes I do.

You must be registered for see images

 

[Duckjake]

For the first time in a long, long time I watched the games yesterday and thought that the teams weren't that much better than the Cardinals.

I used to watch and just be amazed at how much bigger, stronger and faster the other teams players were. Not yesterday.

We're finally at a point where almost every game will come down to who makes the fewest mistakes or best coaching moves instead of us having no chance at all.

Sure we'd still lose to the Patriots but it would be like all the other good teams do, not like we were sending out a bunch of division I-AA players like we used to.

 

[MigratingOsprey]

no crow eating at all on my end - i thought this would be a tough one and i still stand by my thoughts that some of the reasoning was idiotic

seattle lost this game because they couldn't match up with size - GB was more physical and with the conditions that made a huge difference - no bitching because that's the NFL and a risk seattle had to factor in when building their team

they just flat out got pushed around - it happens

it's a tough league and like every year the division will be wide open - but the hawks have a 4 year run - all the media and everyone can yet again predict their downfall, but until it happens on the field the talk means nothing

 

[82CardsGrad]

no crow eating at all on my end - i thought this would be a tough one and i still stand by my thoughts that some of the reasoning was idiotic

seattle lost this game because they couldn't match up with size - GB was more physical and with the conditions that made a huge difference - no bitching because that's the NFL and a risk seattle had to factor in when building their team

they just flat out got pushed around - it happens

it's a tough league and like every year the division will be wide open - but the hawks have a 4 year run - all the media and everyone can yet again predict their downfall, but until it happens on the field the talk means nothing

They do need to address their running game though... Bad weather or not, they simply can't run the ball on a consistent basis and I don't care what anyone says, Hasselback is simply not capable of overcoming that problem - few QB's are actually...

 

[MigratingOsprey]

agree with that - i think the problem is still upfront

i've never liked chris gray and it's more obvious than ever that he's too old to be a starter

all the good that rob sims showed last year he completely erased this year - dude looked lost

hard to run the ball when you get no push - it's the reason they lost the cleveland game

they also need to address the TE position in a bad way