- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Posts
- 11,660
- Reaction score
- 844
Tucker also stumped to keep the big lineup going, even when Knight comes back.
"We turned down shots to get other shots for each other," Tucker said. "Me and Marcus play so well together, a couple times I was wide open I seen him and swing it to him and he does the same. So it's just having trust in each other, playing together."
"I really like our lineup with me and Marcus (Morris) at the two and three," he said. "I don't think we lost a rebound battle against any team since we went to that lineup. We communicate better so I really like that lineup."
http://www.brightsideofthesun.com/2...t=chorus&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
Markieff and I believe Bledsoe also both said that they like this lineup more because it gives them much needed length defensively and others teams don't get mismatches they take advantage of.
I know we gave up a lot for Knight but still, is he better off in a 6th man type role for at least remainder of this season? I don't know if him and his agent will be happy about it since their trying to land a huge contract this summer but still, the team seems to be doing so much better. Win or loss, for the first time in a long time we don't look like a gimmick team during this stretch.
I'm not a big fan of Marcus but he's been balling since getting the start defensively and especially on the glass.
Also, we always try to post up Tucker and even that works much better when he's playing the 2 because he has a strength advantage over most SGs in the league.
Our bench has been outscored in 6 straight games so I think Knight, a premier scorer, off the bench would help greatly with that also.
I think we should go forward with this current lineup at least for the time being until it turns into a disaster or something.
Keep this lineup or return to Bledsoe-Knight-Tucker-Kieff-Len?
Last edited: