George O'Brien said:I remember a him hitting a three to win a game. I was going "Oh noooooooo, Oh Yessss".
He also hit the a pretty amazing 3 to send the 2nd meeting with the Spurs into OT(37points 15rebs that game).
George O'Brien said:I remember a him hitting a three to win a game. I was going "Oh noooooooo, Oh Yessss".
George O'Brien said:I too get frustrated by the lack of movement off the ball by the Suns. Some of this is due to the fact that when teams react to Amare and Nash, it leaves someone open and Nash typically finds the open man. Why move if you can get open while just standing still or making minor sideways slides?
I think the answer is that this approach is too predictable. Using cutters means that guarding the Suns would be more complicated than just making rapid rotations.
Maybe the "point center" offense will include Marion as a cutter. It would certainly make sense. Get the ball to Amare at the elbow with Marion and KT on the baseline wings. If Amare's defender backs off, Amare gets the equivalent of a free throw. If he comes up, Amare will blow by the big guys and overpower the smaller guys. If help comes from KT's guy, KT gets an open jumper. If it comes from Marion's side, Shawn can drive and dunk. With three point shooters behind him, Amare simply kicks back to Nash or one of the SG's.
One thing about this point center offense is that it can be run without having to have the ball in Nash's hands.
Chaplin said:What is this mythical "point center offense" you keep talking about? Amare mentioned in an interview that he was going to be like a point center--we don't know how serious he was about that, and we certainly don't know if that is going to be the basis for a whole offense.