JCSunsfan
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2002
- Posts
- 22,114
- Reaction score
- 6,547
Liked the guy but was perpetually injured.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Nader waived
Liked the guy but was perpetually injured.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Nader waived
Crazy knowing that at least one of the big East teams will be eliminated in round 1.That was a hell of a fun couple days.
The East is REALLY balanced with title contenders in NJ, Philly, Milwaukee and Miami, each of which have two big superstars and then solid upstarts with the Bulls, Cavs Hawks (who have finally turned it around) and a young up and comer with Charlotte, who’s got exciting high fliers. Then there’s still the Celtics.
I believe this is correct. The moves today are salary neutral. They still have money to make a move in the buyout market.
Still can’t believe they didn’t.. nah not gonna say it.. Welcome Torrey and Aaron.
It will be fitting that when the Suns take their Champagne Shower in the Locker Room at the end of the Finals, Torrey Craig will be right there with them to wrap up unfinished business as they celebrate the franchises first NBA Championship.Yeah, I was really looking forward to it, I figured we might at least see em in street clothes around the bench. I guess is they couldn't make it in time.
When Craig gets reintroduced its going to be loud.
It's tough for me to feel this confident. Right now I wouldn't put any team above us but I don't know if I will ever again be as confident about us winning it all as I was after game 2 of the finals last season.It will be fitting that when the Suns take their Champagne Shower in the Locker Room at the end of the Finals, Torrey Craig will be right there with them to wrap up unfinished business as they celebrate the franchises first NBA Championship.
i said in November, losing Craig was their biggest off-season mistake. i was wrong. Adding Elfrid Payton was. perhaps they''ll complete the second part of the fix soon.
I think Payton was lucky that when the trade deadline hit he was the only reserve guard on the roster and we playing a game with a lot of hype and hate. If Holliday was immediately available or if Payne and Shamet were healthy I think it is highly likely that Payton would have gotten the axe today instead of Nader.
Agreed. Is there anyone in the buyout market that we think we might take a run at?
Agree. I think it’ll be the Heat.Honestly. I don't think Milwaukee will be in the finals this year.
I am with Finito on this. Playing small ball with teams like Golden State is playing to their strengths not ours. I don't mind having an option but the second we play the way Golden State wants us to is the second we lose a series against them. Even in the Bucks game last night when we had two bigs on the floor, the coach called a time out because we were manhandling them down low. This team is built around having a big presence and we need to force teams to play to our lineup and not the other way around. Option? Sure but it's the last thing I want to see this team use. If we are playing small for any extended period of time? Something really wrong happened during that game.Small ball lineups should always be an option. It's situational basketball.
I like the idea the Suns can throw a myriad of different lineups at another team if the circumstances dictate.
I am with Finito on this. Playing small ball with teams like Golden State is playing to their strengths not ours. I don't mind having an option but the second we play the way Golden State wants us to is the second we lose a series against them. Even in the Bucks game last night when we had two bigs on the floor, the coach called a time out because we were manhandling them down low.
In the Hawks game the Suns dominated the paint but were still outrebounded by 2. If you play small ball, the Suns on the other end don't dominate the paint, don't get as many easy buckets and likely get outrebounded by a wider margin giving up more second chance points. That game wasn't lost because they didn't roll out small ball. That game was lost because they chucked up 32 threes and made only 9. In the Heat game they gave up a ton of second chance points and the Heat dominated them on the boards. Again, that would have been worse playing more small ball. IMO, NOT playing small ball had nothing to do with those losses. IMO the only time I like to see small ball is to spark an offensive run.....never to spark defense.I was just talking to @Dback Jon about this and the Suns losses to the Hawks and Heat. As a change-up defense I think it's nice to be able to play small-ball lineups at times.
In the Suns losses to the Hawks and Heat, those teams shot from .500 from 3-point range in those games. There are some nights teams don't miss from three and and the Suns need to be able to play smaller, quicker lineups to get out on them.
It doesn't mean the Suns shouldn't be able to switch back and forth during the same game. After all the Suns want to go their strength which is size at center, defense and the mid-range shot. I wouldn't want to see a steady diet of small-ball but it has a time and place.
In the Hawks game the Suns dominated the paint but were still outrebounded by 2. If you play small ball, the Suns on the other end don't dominate the paint, don't get as many easy buckets and likely get outrebounded by a wider margin giving up more second chance points. That game wasn't lost because they didn't roll out small ball. That game was lost because they chucked up 32 threes and made only 9. In the Heat game they gave up a ton of second chance points and the Heat dominated them on the boards. Again, that would have been worse playing more small ball. IMO, NOT playing small ball had nothing to do with those losses. IMO the only time I like to see small ball is to spark an offensive run.....never to spark defense.