CatBoxBackFan
Hall of Famer
That was helmet to helmet on Willis McGahee.To many hits during his career.
That was helmet to helmet on Willis McGahee.To many hits during his career.
100% disagree. It was clean. He threw his shoulder into the guy first. He didn't launch from his feet helmet first. It was a vicious hit but not dirty at all.
HUH? He led with the helmet, and hit with the helmet. No WAY in HELL that was clean. Not a chance in hell. Dirty freaking hit.
Dude, dont argue. This guy here knows all. He knows so much, he is forced by his supreme knowledge to bash Cardinals after they play their way into the SB.HUH? He led with the helmet, and hit with the helmet. No WAY in HELL that was clean. Not a chance in hell. Dirty freaking hit.
Dude, dont argue. This guy here knows all. He knows so much, he is forced by his supreme knowledge to bash Cardinals after they play their way into the SB.
Come to think of it, he must work for ESPN.
Just watched it again. Also, saw the replay from 3 angles. Have no clue what you were watching. No question it was a clean hit.
I have NO idea what play you are watching. it was CLEAR helmet to helmet. You can argue if he led, but he HIT helmet to helmet. There is NO doubt there.
FFS man.
We will have to disagree. He went shoulder first, then the helmets collided. There is a big difference between leading with the helmet. Helmet to helmet collisions are not illegal unelss you lead and are not dirty. It's when you lead with the helmet when it becomes dirty.
I personally, after watching it many times, think he led with the helmet, and there is no doubt he hit helmet to helmet.
I saw NO shoulder into that one....there was no let up either. He led, and hit, with the helmet. We'll have to agree to disagree and wait on what the league thinks.
He is also not a dirty player.