Skattebo’s Big Moment

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
90,218
Reaction score
42,230
And the same time I was watching the Marv videos I saw one on Skattebo that says they think 4th round is more likely than 3rd, that there were concerns about his 40 even though he actually ran faster than expected but his 20 is what had people more concerned I guess for RB's that's sort of becoming the new thing they look at because it's the ability to hit the hole and go that they value
 

AsUpRoDiGy

Magnanimous
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Posts
6,871
Reaction score
5,207
Location
Phx
And the same time I was watching the Marv videos I saw one on Skattebo that says they think 4th round is more likely than 3rd, that there were concerns about his 40 even though he actually ran faster than expected but his 20 is what had people more concerned I guess for RB's that's sort of becoming the new thing they look at because it's the ability to hit the hole and go that they value
10 yard split and the shuttle are much better indicators, for sure.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,914
Reaction score
12,339
Analysts are pretty high on Skattebo so I'm not sure why so many people here think he's going to be practice squad fodder. I didnt go to the Arizona schools, I'm assuming the disdain is mainly UA grads who are upset about him being an ASU player?

A lot of this thread reminds me of when UT grads thought Myles Garrett was going to be bad in the pros.

Reminds me more of Eno Benjamin.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,914
Reaction score
12,339
That's pretty crazy, seriously. Wager that he has a better career than Eno?

Eno basically didn't have a career, so that is a low bar, but I think the level of over hype on this forum, entirely because he played for ASU, tracks right along.

His college success was based on running through arm tackles, he isn't elusive, nor is he fast, he is also not big. That combination of traits, IMO, will add up to a total non-factor in the NFL.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,488
Reaction score
12,319
Eno basically didn't have a career, so that is a low bar, but I think the level of over hype on this forum, entirely because he played for ASU, tracks right along.

His college success was based on running through arm tackles, he isn't elusive, nor is he fast, he is also not big. That combination of traits, IMO, will add up to a total non-factor in the NFL.
Wager?
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,914
Reaction score
12,339

On what? I am not going to bet that he fails to beat out Eno's 300 something career yards, but I'd wager he never has a season of more than... 700.

Or that by his 4th season he will be on a roster besides the one that drafted him... or be out of the league entirely.

I'd certainly wager that he hype on this forum is entirely because of his college. Don't know how you'd quantify that, but I'd bet that if you took all the top forum from each team's fan base, he has been talked about here more than on all the other forums combined.

Hell, he is the most talked about player in this draft on THIS forum by a gargantuan margin. This thread is rapidly catching up to the thread on Marvin Harrison.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,675
Reaction score
34,912
Location
Charlotte, NC
Eno basically didn't have a career, so that is a low bar, but I think the level of over hype on this forum, entirely because he played for ASU, tracks right along.

His college success was based on running through arm tackles, he isn't elusive, nor is he fast, he is also not big. That combination of traits, IMO, will add up to a total non-factor in the NFL.
Do you follow any of the national draftniks? Skattebo gets a lot of mention.

I think Murray is right that if just draft good football players, you'll have a good team. I think it was Brett Kollman who was saying the same thing when he was talking about Shemar Stewart (who isn't really a good football player).
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,914
Reaction score
12,339
Do you follow any of the national draftniks? Skattebo gets a lot of mention.

I think Murray is right that if just draft good football players, you'll have a good team. I think it was Brett Kollman who was saying the same thing when he was talking about Shemar Stewart (who isn't really a good football player).

Well, you certainly don’t want to draft players that were bad, like Anthony Richardson.

But also, sometimes the skills that work for a guy in college are unlikely to translate, no matter how good he was at the college level.

You must be registered for see images attach
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,646
Reaction score
15,316
maybe a really good old school Cardinal comp for Skatt:

Larry Centers. Amazing ability to stay on his feet, great short area shiftiness -- and a premier 3rd down back. Clearly lacked breakaway speed but had a productive career


xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
93,300
Reaction score
72,948
maybe a really good old school Cardinal comp for Skatt:

Larry Centers. Amazing ability to stay on his feet, great short area shiftiness -- and a premier 3rd down back. Clearly lacked breakaway speed but had a productive career


xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Centers really only had a “productive” career because of the complete absence of talent on offense. He did nothing to move the needle as an offensive player. Being able to get 7 yards on 3rd and 15 checkdowns isn’t much of an accomplishment, IMO.

And he couldn’t run the ball effectively. If we’re drafting Skatt in the first four rounds, he’s got to be able to run the ball.
 

Absolute Zero

ASFN Icon
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Posts
17,982
Reaction score
9,565
As an out of stater I really didn't understand the full dynamics of ASU vs. UoA. UoA, how in the world did you let the small state school be the historically dominant one????? Better win percentage AND 18 conference championships to 6? 49-7 last meeting? You lost 70-7 in 2020?

I understand this thread completely now.

You had me at 70-7.

A phrase that really should be repeated as much as possible. Such a nice ring to it. ;)
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,646
Reaction score
15,316
Centers really only had a “productive” career because of the complete absence of talent on offense. He did nothing to move the needle as an offensive player. Being able to get 7 yards on 3rd and 15 checkdowns isn’t much of an accomplishment, IMO.

And he couldn’t run the ball effectively. If we’re drafting Skatt in the first four rounds, he’s got to be able to run the ball.
i wont stand for the Larry Centers slander!!

Centers was in the league for 14 years! a niche / specialist player no doubt, but a really good one at the role -- you dont last that long on hollow stats
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,675
Reaction score
34,912
Location
Charlotte, NC
I don't think Eno Benjamin took five top 30 visits.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Eno and Skattebo shouldn't be mentioned in the same sentence. I think people are forgetting some of the huge games he had last year, not just running the football, but catching the football as well.

Skattebo has been underrated before and he proved people wrong.

But I wouldn't advocate for picking him before round 3 because he doesn't check EVERY box and the Cardinals have a pretty good RB room right now.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,675
Reaction score
34,912
Location
Charlotte, NC
Well, you certainly don’t want to draft players that were bad, like Anthony Richardson.

But also, sometimes the skills that work for a guy in college are unlikely to translate, no matter how good he was at the college level.

You must be registered for see images attach
I think this is a pretty lousy comp though. Tebow was below average as a college passer, but had pretty damn good physical skills, so in essence he wasn't a very good football player at his actual primary position.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
19,309
Reaction score
18,097
Location
Modesto, California
maybe a really good old school Cardinal comp for Skatt:

Larry Centers. Amazing ability to stay on his feet, great short area shiftiness -- and a premier 3rd down back. Clearly lacked breakaway speed but had a productive career


xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
LARRY! LARRY!LARRY!LARRY!
I can still hear the crowd......
 
OP
OP
Harry

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
13,040
Reaction score
29,103
Location
Orlando, FL
I think this is a pretty lousy comp though. Tebow was below average as a college passer, but had pretty damn good physical skills, so in essence he wasn't a very good football player at his actual primary position.
i know I’m a Contrarian on this but I believe Tebow could have succeeded if the NFL wasn’t so set its way. I’d be curious to see, for example, how he’d do with a run first team like the Cardinals. He was fine on short throws and not easy on pass rushers. Teams found him hard to prep for as their scout teams really couldn’t accurately emulate him. His team would have had trouble with a backup QB who could effectively run the offense if Tebow was injured. No team wanted to completely revamp the offense and rebuild it around a runner. Of course the Cards have a line skilled in pulling and getting them in front of Tebow would have been a challenge for any defense. I suppose they would have pulled up both safeties, but Tebow wasn’t terrible on medium tree routes. It was considered a big risk to wholly change an offense, so no team did. I think it would have been fun.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
611,387
Posts
5,555,923
Members
6,349
Latest member
Puffer Fish
Top