You must be registered for see images attach
I think this is a small enough sample not to violate copyright. 90+ is round 1I disagree.23 first rounders. Which is good. But unfortunately 6 are at safety, QB or ILB, positions we don’t need.
The NFL has always been a ”copycat” league. Now everyone wants the next Deebo Samuel and some have nominated Burks. He’s more quick than fast, but he is physical and could do screens and sweeps effectively. He has decent hands and posts reasonable YAC numbers. He can return punts & kickoffs. His size makes him a potential red zone target.I don’t pretend to know anything about the college talent except the highlights I see. I do know whoever Keim takes there’s a 35% chance he’s wrong! Lol.
However, seeing Burks highlights he reminds me a little Deebo.
Harry,what’s your take on Burks? Is he worthy at 23?
Another “that’s why GMs get the big bucks” question. He likely won’t play until near season’s end. That said he’s potentially a power player at a position it’s hard to find. The Cards should have no chance at a player of this caliber picking at 23. Ojabo is also raw, so he probably wouldn’t blossom until his second year. If you’re going strict BPA, he’s the best you’ll get at 23. I can’t see how you pass him as it’s a chance to get a highly expensive player at an affordable level. Yes it compromises 2022, but should pay huge dividends for the following 4 years. I’d grab him.Is OLB David Ojabo worth taking a risk at #23 since he tore his achilles at the Michigan pro day. He would have gone most likely in the teens before the injury.
Didn’t want to say what we are all thinkingI disagree.
--Steve Keim
Vance Joseph was at Logan Hall’s Pro Day today and spoke very highly of him. This would actually be a Keim type pick I could get behind. He reminds me a lot or Erik Armstead.
I’m hearing Penning is long gone. Coaches love O-linemen with an attitude plus he tested great.Karlaftis, Penning and Burks caught my eye thus far. They each play a different position. I could see one of them outshining the other two.
Which, if any, has the edge when you factor in BPA, Game Changer, Fills a Need, Available at #23 etc. I could see any one of them outshining the other two. If all three were available, who would you draft?
PS Note the absence of a talented CB at #23. (though that could all change as Draft Day looms nearer).
For the Cardinals? Absolutely! Its not like a defensive guy drafted by the Cardinals in the first round will see the field anyway.Is OLB David Ojabo worth taking a risk at #23 since he tore his achilles at the Michigan pro day. He would have gone most likely in the teens before the injury.
Ojabo is a guy I'd consider even with the injury. He'd have been long gone by 23.Another “that’s why GMs get the big bucks” question. He likely won’t play until near season’s end. That said he’s potentially a power player at a position it’s hard to find. The Cards should have no chance at a player of this caliber picking at 23. Ojabo is also raw, so he probably wouldn’t blossom until his second year. If you’re going strict BPA, he’s the best you’ll get at 23. I can’t see how you pass him as it’s a chance to get a highly expensive player at an affordable level. Yes it compromises 2022, but should pay huge dividends for the following 4 years. I’d grab him.