Solid take on Warner deal

seesred

Registered User
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
28
Location
section 8 row 10
I’m still scratching my head over Dennis Green’s ill-advised decision to replace starting QB Josh McCown with Shaun King on the eve of the Cardinals’ Week 11 game in Carolina this past season.

Granted, McCown’s passing numbers were far from scintillating. But it sure looked at the time like he was more than adequate under center, which was all that was really required to be competitive in a division that was by far the weakest in the league.

Entering that game, Arizona had won two straight and three of its past four. What followed were four straight ugly losses that in effect killed the Cardinals’ season, as well as doing nothing for McCown’s confidence.

All that said, even though I continue to believe McCown has gotten a raw deal in the Valley, I applaud the Cardinals’ decision to sign two-time league MVP Kurt Warner to a one-year deal worth $4 million.

The more I think about it, the more I like it.

Put simply, Warner instantly makes the Cardinals a much more interesting team. The tremendous success he had with the Rams continues to overshadow his decline in effectiveness over the past few seasons and figures to give the Cardinals a badly needed boost at the box office, which is a significant development considering that a brand-new state-of-the-art stadium opens for business in 2006.

Of course, the Cardinals had hoped another veteran performer with a glittering résumé, all-time NFL rushing leader Emmitt Smith, would also generate a nice hike in attendance. But after all was said and done, Cardinals fans could never quite get past the fact that Smith, a future Hall of Famer, was clearly on his last legs and a shadow of his former dominant self.

Based on his last few seasons, there are many who believe the same can be said for Warner, who will turn 34 in June. Given the same kind of opportunity by the Giants last year that he is now being given by the Cardinals, Warner started strong before crashing and burning nine games into the season, ironically reaching his low point when he was sacked six times in a 17-14 loss to Arizona that officially signaled the beginning of the Eli Manning era in the Big Apple.

But if you believe Warner, who was expected to hold a news conference in Arizona today, the ingredients for a very different scenario are in place with his new team, beginning with a much greater familiarity with the offensive system he will be asked to embrace. New Cardinals offensive coordinator Keith Rowen earned his spurs as the Chiefs’ TE coach under Dick Vermeil, Warner’s head coach during his glory days in St. Louis.

Which brings us to another extremely appealing aspect of this trade.

If the Rams continue underachieving like they did last season — their abysmal playoff performance vs. the Falcons completely obliterated any positive vibes there might have been following their last-ditch surge into the playoffs — there could be as many Cardinals fans in St. Louis next season as there are Rams fans.

That might be a bit of a stretch, but there’s no denying that Warner remains unbelievably popular in St. Louis. And when he told the Arizona media late last week that “nobody knows the whole story” as to why he is no longer playing with the Rams, he added an extra dose of intrigue to his captivating persona.

Needless to say, the wild-and-crazy NFC West has gotten a bit wilder with the Cardinals-Rams rivalry having been turned up a notch. Things could really get crazy if the Cardinals can find a decent running back to add to the mix.

In WRs Larry Fitzgerald, Anquan Boldin and Bryant Johnson, Warner will have much more inviting targets in his sights than he had in New York. He also figures to be operating behind a better offensive line, especially at the tackles, where behemoth Leonard Davis and newly acquired Oliver Ross should offer solid protection.

But a solid back with some explosiveness remains the missing piece in the offensive puzzle. Green spoke glowingly at the recent Scouting Combine in Indianapolis about the Auburn tandem of Ronnie Brown and Carnell “Cadillac” Williams, and it would shock nobody if the Cardinals used the eighth overall pick on one of them should either still be on the board.

It appeared at one point that the team had some interest in trading for Bills RB Travis Henry, who has been reduced to second-fiddle status behind Willis McGahee in Buffalo, but the rumors have died down along those lines. The continuing rumor that the Cards may be interested in Vikings RB Michael Bennett — who played under Green in Minnesota and has a year left on his contract — could be a different story.

“Are you sure they’re just rumors?” Bennett asked the (St. Paul, Minn.) Pioneer Press over the weekend. “We’ll see.”

Yes, we will.

And regardless of what happens, the Cardinals should be a helluva lot more fun to watch. Green fell short of handing Warner the starting QB job on a silver platter, but it’s highly unlikely the Cardinals are paying their newest signalcaller $4 mil to sit on the bench.

I never thought I’d say this, but the Cardinals’ minicamps can’t start soon enough.
From Pro football weekly


GBR
40
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
15,583
Reaction score
15,844
Location
Plainfield, Il.
Comparing the signings of Warner and Smith are like night and day, IMO.

When we signed Smith I thought it was more a ploy to boost ticket sales and get a little national attention. Smith was a mere shadow of himself and obviously was not a player that could once carry a team. Add to that he had no supporting cast whatsoever.

Warner brings the ability to throw the ball to a nice array of young receivers. He doesn't have to be Kurt Warner of 99. In fact if he can be just 75% of what he was that would still calculate out to over 30 td's and 3000 yards. That would be better than ANY qb that ever played in Arizona....maybe in the history of the franchise.
He will not succeed if we do not have a running game. He will not succeed if we don't pass protect. But give him a little of both and we will be amazed on how this guy can thread a needle.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
I view this a bit more simply.

Every NFL team needs at least 2 quarterbacks they can win with. There is more than one model:

- (a) The blue chip QB in his prime, (b) seasoned veteran backup

- (a) The blue chip QB in his prime, (b) young QOF

- (a) The older blue chip QB, (b) young QOF

- (a) young QOF, (b) mentored by the seasoned veteran backup

Last year Dennis Green hoped he could deploy his resources more effectively by taking the calculated risk that McCown would be ready to fill a starting role and Shawn King would be an adequate veteran backup. It didn't work out in 2 different ways: McCown wasn't ready and we couldn't win with King.

Coming into this year, Green knew he had to replace King as the second QB and he wasn't totally sold that McCown would be ready. In Warner, Green adds a veteran QB he thinks we can win with - either as a starter should he win the job from McCown or McCown still not be ready; or as a backup we can win with.

Solid football decision as I see it..
 

blindseyed

I'm saying you ARE stuck in Wichita
Joined
Mar 20, 2003
Posts
7,922
Reaction score
5,587
Location
Verrado
Unless Warner gets hurt or sux completely, he;s starting. There's no QB competition, he wasn't signed to hold a clip board.

I think if the O-line protects him, we're gonna have an awesome passing game. Warner can throw, he has a rifle. Add that to a healthy Quan and Fitz having a year under his belt, could be as good, maybe better than Brue/Holt were. I do agree we need a solid RB that can not only run but catch AND block. Kurt isn't a scrambler, so if he's given alittel time, we could be a team to watch.
Is it September yet??????
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
552,850
Posts
5,403,450
Members
6,315
Latest member
SewingChick65
Top