Southern California(13) at Arizona State
- Thread starter RedStorm
- Start date
azmike74
Hall of Famer
damn, I am gonna go all in on USC!
MaoTosiFanClub
The problem
I'm guessing a nice big "I told you so" from Gadd regarding Danny Sullivan.
Then a blame deflection a week later when he wets himself at Autzen.
FArting
Lopes Up!
Time to pull off an upset.
Go Devils!
USC 35
ASU 27
Prove me wrong
Go Devils!
USC 35
ASU 27
Prove me wrong
Last edited:
Nice.
Actually expecting all 3 QBs to see action in this game in some form, although I don't know who they're going to throw to. Maybe the next John Jefferson decided to walk-on this week.
Im eager to see Samson. On his one TD plan he looked great, his athletic ability was evident, he rolled out at a much quicker rate than Sullivan does. I know his elbow doesnt allow him to throw it downfield much, but ASU hasnt had a vertical attack all year anyway, so Im not too worried about that. Maybe he'll give ASU some of the elements Oregon had that were so successful against SC*.
*not that this means I think ASU can beat SC w/ Samson in, just maybe get embarrassed less.
Gambo is a Clown
Newbie
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2009
- Posts
- 6
- Reaction score
- 0
I don't even care that much if they win this game. Just end the Danny Sullivan experiment already and I'll be happy. I don't think I've ever enjoyed watching an offense as little as this one.
Why cant I bet on this?
OP
OP
I dont know. What is it that is preventing you???
OP
OP
Are you under a ban? I know I was and I was not able to place bets.
Gee! Im glad you've made it to this thread. This isn't actually a thread about ASU-USC, we all brought you here to talk about your gambling problem- don't run! We're all friends, we want to help....
I am banned from the P&R forum for whatever reason.. So being banned from one single forum denied you from being able to bet? What the hell good is this money to me then? Boooooooooooooo.. I only make like 2 bets a year.. This stinks..
I hate to say it ...... but ..... this is going to be a beat down.
And there's the Danny Sullivan that......................... 
You have to give it up for the D so far though.
I know it's only 3 to 0 but I am shocked at this point!
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2003
- Posts
- 119,253
- Reaction score
- 59,868
Playing Sullivan at QB is bad decision because he lacks mobility and especially makes poor decisions outside the pocket. However, the coach's decision to play him is even worse.
Maybe somebody can tell Sullivan he is not a basketball player and to quit trying to shoot (throw) jump shots. This is just horrible. If ASU would play one of their other two young QB's losing the game would be more palatible because I could at least rationalize that a young QB may make mistakes but he is developing. Seeing Sullivan make bad plays is already... been there, done that.
Maybe somebody can tell Sullivan he is not a basketball player and to quit trying to shoot (throw) jump shots. This is just horrible. If ASU would play one of their other two young QB's losing the game would be more palatible because I could at least rationalize that a young QB may make mistakes but he is developing. Seeing Sullivan make bad plays is already... been there, done that.
Last edited:
Talk about stiff arms!
