Steelers release CB Steven Nelson

AZman5103

Hall of Famer
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
1,673
Reaction score
1,767
Location
Idaho
Now is the time to go to the vet players who could restructure and tell them "Here is what we want to do". Right now we seem to have players on our side and they are viewing us a contenders. Get the restructures done, and get creative enough to land us 2 CB's.
 

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
31,382
Reaction score
27,990
Location
Nowhere
The question is, do we need a true #1 CB with the zone schemes Vance Joseph runs? Would 2 Solid #2s work since there are no 1:1 match ups? Nelson was rated, I think, as the 28th best CB the last 3 seasons. Between him, a 1st round CB and Murphy, along with the Safeties we have, that would be better than last year by leaps and bonds. PP is a low level #2 now and the drop off was bad after him and Murphy. If you Alford can give even spot duty as a 4th CB, then it's icing on the cake. I'd even offer Sherman a 1 year $2 million deal and fight it out with Alford for the final CB spot.
 
Last edited:

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,747
Reaction score
23,904
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
The question is, do we need a true #1 CB with the zone schemes Vance Joseph runs? Would 2 Solid #2s work since there are no 1:1 match ups? Nelson was rated, I think, as the 28th best CB the last 3 seasons. Between him, a 1st round CB and Murphy, along with the Safeties we have, that would he better than last year by leaps and bonds. PP is a low level #2 now and the drop off was bad after him and Murphy. If you Alford can give even spot duty as a 4th CB, then it's icing on the cake. I'd even offer Sherman a 1 year $2 million deal and fight it out with Alford for the final CB spot.

I concur. I don't like backing ourselves into having to take a CB in rd. 1, but that's looking inevitable at this point.
 

Vacard

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Posts
4,512
Reaction score
4,069
Location
VA
Because why would we want to fill EITHER of our starting CB roster spots with GOOD players? smh
Because I think Richard Sherman is old and slow enough to fit our scheme
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
87,646
Reaction score
38,905
At the right price Sherman does still have value. he's not a pro bowler anymore but he is good in a zone, he is a ball hawk, and he's a very good tackler. You don't want him as your #1 Cb but he can still play if he's healthy, if he's anywhere near the ball he'll make a play on it. And even though I know people hate him, he's actually a really good guy on a team, he's a leader of men if you will and he studies the game so he's a good help for younger players.

My guess is he probably wants too much money but I could see him doing what Green and JJ did and saying I think Arizona has a chance to be really good and I want to be on a contender.
 

Germz249

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2020
Posts
1,452
Reaction score
2,206
Location
Gilbert
At the right price Sherman does still have value. he's not a pro bowler anymore but he is good in a zone, he is a ball hawk, and he's a very good tackler. You don't want him as your #1 Cb but he can still play if he's healthy, if he's anywhere near the ball he'll make a play on it. And even though I know people hate him, he's actually a really good guy on a team, he's a leader of men if you will and he studies the game so he's a good help for younger players.

My guess is he probably wants too much money but I could see him doing what Green and JJ did and saying I think Arizona has a chance to be really good and I want to be on a contender.

If so he would be 3/4 of the way from completing the nfc west tour.
 

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,497
Reaction score
5,754
Location
Scarsdale, NY
I'd still like to sign him even though we signed Butler.
stout, no doubt we still need another CB, either in the draft (1st or 2nd) or in FA. I'm sure the team would prefer FA, so that we would have more flexibility in the draft, but money will decide.
 
Top