Rab
Angry Vedder
Anyone else catch this interview this morning? Bick did an excellent job of asking the question a lot of us want better explanation for in a non-threatening or bitter way.
- Why did Stern go by the letter of the law in punishing the Suns during Horrygate, but then go on a few months later and interpret the gambling rule in regards to refs by the spirit of the law?
Sterns response was that there was a precedence for the "leaving the bench" rule that has been enforced for years. In regards to the refs gambling rule, it hadn't ever really been enforced, and so when it was time to do so, times had changed so much that he saw the rule as outdated and old.
A caller then called in after the interview and made an interesting point. There was a scandal in the past where refs were busted by the IRS for exchanging their first class plane tickets for coach seats and pocketing the cash without reporting it. Stern then fired theses refs only to rehire them later. He also made a good point about how Duncan stepped on the floor in the same game Amare and Boris did, and used the explanation used by Stu Jackson when asked why Duncan wasn't suspended. His response was that he could tell by Duncan's body language that he wasn't going to try anything on the court. Funny thing was, in the interview just moments before with Stern, he has just said that there is no way to tell what a player's intention is when they walk onto the court.
Again, it just shows how inconsistent the NBA front office has become, and how frustrating it can be. Not trying to stir up anything, and I certainly hate opening up this can of worms again, but I just thought I'd share as I found it to be interesting.
- Why did Stern go by the letter of the law in punishing the Suns during Horrygate, but then go on a few months later and interpret the gambling rule in regards to refs by the spirit of the law?
Sterns response was that there was a precedence for the "leaving the bench" rule that has been enforced for years. In regards to the refs gambling rule, it hadn't ever really been enforced, and so when it was time to do so, times had changed so much that he saw the rule as outdated and old.
A caller then called in after the interview and made an interesting point. There was a scandal in the past where refs were busted by the IRS for exchanging their first class plane tickets for coach seats and pocketing the cash without reporting it. Stern then fired theses refs only to rehire them later. He also made a good point about how Duncan stepped on the floor in the same game Amare and Boris did, and used the explanation used by Stu Jackson when asked why Duncan wasn't suspended. His response was that he could tell by Duncan's body language that he wasn't going to try anything on the court. Funny thing was, in the interview just moments before with Stern, he has just said that there is no way to tell what a player's intention is when they walk onto the court.
Again, it just shows how inconsistent the NBA front office has become, and how frustrating it can be. Not trying to stir up anything, and I certainly hate opening up this can of worms again, but I just thought I'd share as I found it to be interesting.
Last edited: